Experimental Measurements of the Complex Motion of a Suspended Axisymmetric Floating Body in Regular and Near-Focused Waves

Abstract Numerical models which account for the multiple response modes of floating wave energy converters (WECs) in operating conditions require experimental data for validation. Measurement and observation of complex hydrodynamic mechanisms are also required to inform the development of modelling tools suitable for the simulation of response to extreme waves. Experimental measurements are reported of the motion of an axisymmetric float to regular and near-focused waves. The mechanical system, incident wave conditions and response in a 2D vertical plane are detailed to facilitate comparison to numerical simulations. The system comprises a heaving float connected to a counterweight by an inextensible cable over two pulleys to provide a simplified representation of the slowly varying surge constraint of a mooring system. Translation of the float is measured using an optical encoder. Motion in heave, surge and pitch are also determined by a position identification method based on analysis of video footage. For low frequency regular waves, the float prescribes an elliptical trajectory and the variation of response amplitude with wave amplitude is linear. At higher frequencies, drift of up to one-third of the float radius is observed and the float oscillates along an arc. More complex motions are observed due to the three large amplitude waves of a near-focused wave group. During these waves the upper surfaces of the float are partly immersed and motion occurs in heave, surge and pitch.

[1]  S. D. Weller,et al.  Response of a Small Array Due to Irregular Waves: Comparison to Predictions Based On Measured Regular Wave Response , 2010 .

[2]  D. Evans,et al.  Arrays of three-dimensional wave-energy absorbers , 1981 .

[3]  S. D. Weller,et al.  Wave energy extraction from device arrays : experimental investigation in a large wave facility , 2011 .

[4]  Peter Stansby,et al.  Limiting heave response of a wave energy device by draft adjustment with upper surface immersion , 2009 .

[5]  T. Moan,et al.  Constrained Optimal Control of a Heaving Buoy Wave-Energy Converter , 2011 .

[6]  Matthew Folley,et al.  The effect of sub-optimal control and the spectral wave climate on the performance of wave energy converter arrays , 2009 .

[7]  Lars Johanning,et al.  Mooring systems for wave energy converters: A review of design issues and choices , 2004 .

[8]  M. T. Pontes,et al.  Spectral Bandwidth and WEC Performance Assessment , 2007 .

[9]  P. Frigaard,et al.  First Power Production Figures from the Wave Star Roshage Wave Energy Converter , 2010 .

[10]  Sarah Louise Bellew,et al.  INVESTIGATION OF THE RESPONSE OF GROUPS OF WAVE ENERGY DEVICES , 2011 .

[11]  Francois Flocard,et al.  Increasing power capture of a wave energy device by inertia adjustment , 2012 .

[12]  Benedict D. Rogers,et al.  Numerical simulation of wave energy converters using Eulerian and Lagrangian CFD methods , 2010 .

[13]  Paul M. Hagemeijer,et al.  A New Model For The Kinematics Of Large Ocean Waves-Application As a Design Wave , 1991 .

[14]  Tim Stallard,et al.  A time-varying parameter model of a body oscillating in pitch , 2006 .

[15]  T. Stallard,et al.  Experimental measurements of irregular wave interaction factors in closely spaced arrays , 2009 .

[16]  Benedict D. Rogers,et al.  SPH for 3D floating bodies using variable mass particle distribution , 2013 .