Cognitive Load Theory: How Many Types of Load Does It Really Need?

Cognitive load theory has been traditionally described as involving three separate and additive types of load. Germane load is considered as a learning-relevant load complementing extraneous and intrinsic load. This article argues that, in its traditional treatment, germane load is essentially indistinguishable from intrinsic load, and therefore this concept may be redundant. Contrary to extraneous and intrinsic load, germane cognitive load was added to the cognitive load framework based on theoretical considerations rather than on specific empirical results that could not be explained without this concept. The design of corresponding learning activities always required methods and techniques external to the theory. The article suggests that the dual intrinsic/extraneous framework is sufficient and non-redundant and makes boundaries of the theory transparent. The idea of germane load might have an independent role within this framework if (as recently suggested by John Sweller) it is redefined as referring to the actual working memory resources devoted to dealing with intrinsic rather than extraneous load.

[1]  L. R. Peterson,et al.  Short-term retention of individual verbal items. , 1959, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  H. Simon,et al.  Perception in chess , 1973 .

[3]  A. D. D. Groot Thought and Choice in Chess , 1978 .

[4]  J. Shea,et al.  Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. , 1979 .

[5]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[6]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load During Problem Solving: Effects on Learning , 1988, Cogn. Sci..

[7]  P. Hancock,et al.  Human Mental Workload , 1988 .

[8]  Matthew W. Lewis,et al.  Self-Explonations: How Students Study and Use Examples in Learning to Solve Problems , 1989, Cogn. Sci..

[9]  P. Chandler,et al.  Cognitive load as a factor in the structuring of technical material. , 1990 .

[10]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  A model of the self-explanation effect. , 1992 .

[11]  J. Sweller COGNITIVE LOAD THEORY, LEARNING DIFFICULTY, AND INSTRUCTIONAL DESIGN , 1994 .

[12]  F. Paas,et al.  Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach , 1994 .

[13]  F. Paas,et al.  Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks , 1994 .

[14]  P. Chandler,et al.  Why Some Material Is Difficult to Learn , 1994 .

[15]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Long-term working memory. , 1995, Psychological review.

[16]  Paul Chandler,et al.  Levels of Expertise and Instructional Design , 1998, Hum. Factors.

[17]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[18]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Prediction of Mental Workload in Single and Multiple Tasks Environments , 2000 .

[19]  Richard E. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[20]  R. Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning: Frontmatter , 2001 .

[21]  R. Atkinson,et al.  Structuring the Transition From Example Study to Problem Solving in Cognitive Skill Acquisition: A Cognitive Load Perspective , 2003 .

[22]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[23]  J. Sweller Evolution of human cognitive architecture , 2003 .

[24]  R. Mayer,et al.  Nine Ways to Reduce Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[25]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[26]  Richard Catrambone,et al.  Designing Instructional Examples to Reduce Intrinsic Cognitive Load: Molar versus Modular Presentation of Solution Procedures , 2004 .

[27]  J. Sweller Instructional Design Consequences of an Analogy between Evolution by Natural Selection and Human Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[28]  Fred Paas,et al.  Process-Oriented Worked Examples: Improving Transfer Performance Through Enhanced Understanding , 2004 .

[29]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Instructional Implications of the Interaction between Information Structures and Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[30]  Richard Mayer,et al.  Multimedia Learning , 2001, Visible Learning Guide to Student Achievement.

[31]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[32]  Paul Ayres Using subjective measures to detect variations of intrinsic cognitive load within problems , 2006 .

[33]  Cornelia S. Große,et al.  Effects of multiple solution methods in mathematics learning , 2006 .

[34]  R. Catrambone,et al.  Can learning from molar and modular worked examples be enhanced by providing instructional explanations and prompting self-explanations? * , 2006 .

[35]  Fred Paas,et al.  Effects of Process-Oriented Worked Examples on Troubleshooting Transfer Performance , 2006 .

[36]  W. Schnotz,et al.  A Reconsideration of Cognitive Load Theory , 2007 .

[37]  Slava Kalyuga Expertise Reversal Effect and Its Implications for Learner-Tailored Instruction , 2007 .

[38]  Alexander Renkl,et al.  Finding and fixing errors in worked examples: Can this foster learning outcomes? ☆ , 2007 .

[39]  Krista E. DeLeeuw,et al.  A Comparison of Three Measures of Cognitive Load: Evidence for Separable Measures of Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Load , 2008 .

[40]  J. Sweller Instructional Implications of David C. Geary's Evolutionary Educational Psychology , 2008 .

[41]  Fred Paas,et al.  Effects of studying sequences of process-oriented and product-oriented worked examples on troubleshooting transfer efficiency , 2008 .

[42]  Maria Bannert,et al.  Effects of a metacognitive support device in learning environments , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[43]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Explaining the split-attention effect: Is the reduction of extraneous cognitive load accompanied by an increase in germane cognitive load? , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Attention guidance during example study via the model's eye movements , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[45]  Katharina Scheiter,et al.  Learning with hypermedia: The influence of representational formats and different levels of learner control on performance and learning behavior , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[46]  Fred Paas,et al.  Uncovering cognitive processes: Different techniques that can contribute to cognitive load research and instruction , 2009, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[47]  R. Catrambone,et al.  The Impact of Learner Characteristics on Information Utilization Strategies, Cognitive Load Experienced, and Performance in Hypermedia Learning , 2009 .

[48]  W. Schnotz Reanalyzing the expertise reversal effect , 2010 .

[49]  Jens F. Beckmann,et al.  Taming a Beast of Burden--On Some Issues with the Conceptualisation and Operationalisation of Cognitive Load. , 2010 .

[50]  J. Sweller Element Interactivity and Intrinsic, Extraneous, and Germane Cognitive Load , 2010 .

[51]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Effects of different ratios of worked solution steps and problem solving opportunities on cognitive load and learning outcomes , 2011, Comput. Hum. Behav..