Single-subject classification of schizophrenia patients based on a combination of oddball and mismatch evoked potential paradigms

OBJECTIVE The diagnostic process for schizophrenia is mainly clinical and has to be performed by an experienced psychiatrist, relying primarily on clinical signs and symptoms. Current neurophysiological measurements can distinguish groups of healthy controls and groups of schizophrenia patients. Individual classification based on neurophysiological measurements mostly shows moderate accuracy. We wanted to examine whether it is possible to distinguish controls and patients individually with a good accuracy. To this end we used a combination of features extracted from the auditory and visual P300 paradigms and the mismatch negativity paradigm. METHODS We selected 54 patients and 54 controls, matched for age and gender, from the data available at the UPC Kortenberg. The EEG-data were high- and low-pass filtered, epoched and averaged. Features (latencies and amplitudes of component peaks) were extracted from the averaged signals. The resulting dataset was used to train and test classification algorithms. First on separate paradigms and then on all combinations, we applied Naïve Bayes, Support Vector Machine and Decision Tree, with two of its improvements: Adaboost and Random Forest. RESULTS For at least two classifiers the performance increased significantly by combining paradigms compared to single paradigms. The classification accuracy increased from at best 79.8% when trained on features from single paradigms, to 84.7% when trained on features from all three paradigms. CONCLUSION A combination of features originating from three evoked potential paradigms allowed us to accurately classify individual subjects as either control or patient. Classification accuracy was mostly above 80% for the machine learners evaluated in this study and close to 85% at best.

[1]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[2]  V. Calhoun,et al.  High Classification Accuracy for Schizophrenia with Rest and Task fMRI Data , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[3]  George Zouridakis,et al.  Single-trial analysis of auditory evoked potentials improves separation of normal and schizophrenia subjects , 2012, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[4]  B. O’Donnell,et al.  Diagnostic specificity of neurophysiological endophenotypes in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. , 2013, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[5]  Florin C. Popescu,et al.  Single-subject classification of schizophrenia by event-related potentials during selective attention , 2011, NeuroImage.

[6]  Yasuhiro Nakata,et al.  Discrimination of female schizophrenia patients from healthy women using multiple structural brain measures obtained with voxel‐based morphometry , 2012, Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences.

[7]  Yoav Freund,et al.  A Short Introduction to Boosting , 1999 .

[8]  Mark Culp,et al.  ada: An R Package for Stochastic Boosting , 2006 .

[9]  Jürgen Gallinat,et al.  Critical evaluation of auditory event-related potential deficits in schizophrenia: evidence from large-scale single-subject pattern classification. , 2014, Schizophrenia bulletin.

[10]  H. Hwu,et al.  Differentiation of Schizophrenia Patients from Healthy Subjects by Mismatch Negativity and Neuropsychological Tests , 2012, PloS one.

[11]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.

[12]  Wei-Yin Loh,et al.  Classification and regression trees , 2011, WIREs Data Mining Knowl. Discov..

[13]  P. Michie,et al.  Duration Mismatch Negativity and P3a in First-Episode Psychosis and Individuals at Ultra-High Risk of Psychosis , 2012, Biological Psychiatry.

[14]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd Edition , 1999 .

[15]  R. Kahn,et al.  Family-wise automatic classification in schizophrenia , 2013, Schizophrenia Research.

[16]  James D. Malley,et al.  Using Multivariate Machine Learning Methods and Structural MRI to Classify Childhood Onset Schizophrenia and Healthy Controls , 2012, Front. Psychiatry.