ESGO/ESTRO/ESP Guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer – Update 2023*

In 2018, the European Society of Gynecological Oncology (ESGO) jointly with the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology (ESTRO) and the European Society of Pathology (ESP) published evidence-based guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer. Given the large body of new evidence addressing the management of cervical cancer, the three sister societies jointly decided to update these evidence-based guidelines. The update includes new topics to provide comprehensive guidelines on all relevant issues of diagnosis and treatment in cervical cancer. To serve on the expert panel (27 experts across Europe) ESGO/ESTRO/ESP nominated practicing clinicians who are involved in managing patients with cervical cancer and have demonstrated leadership through their expertise in clinical care and research, national and international engagement, profile, and dedication to the topics addressed. To ensure the statements were evidence based, new data identified from a systematic search was reviewed and critically appraised. In the absence of any clear scientific evidence, judgment was based on the professional experience and consensus of the international development group. Before publication, the guidelines were reviewed by 155 independent international practitioners in cancer care delivery and patient representatives. These updated guidelines are comprehensive and cover staging, management, follow-up, long-term survivorship, quality of life and palliative care. Management includes fertility sparing treatment, early and locally advanced cervical cancer, invasive cervical cancer diagnosed on a simple hysterectomy specimen, cervical cancer in pregnancy, rare tumors, recurrent and metastatic diseases. The management algorithms and the principles of radiotherapy and pathological evaluation are also defined.

[1]  H. Woopen,et al.  GCIG-Consensus guideline for Long-term survivorship in gynecologic Cancer: A position paper from the gynecologic cancer Intergroup (GCIG) symptom benefit committee. , 2022, Cancer treatment reviews.

[2]  Juan Zhou,et al.  Local treatment improves survival in patients with stage IVB cervical cancer. , 2022, Gynecologic oncology.

[3]  Sudeep Gupta,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery in cervical cancer: past, present and future , 2022, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[4]  Yi Huang,et al.  Therapeutic strategy analysis of patients with advanced stage high‐grade neuroendocrine cervical cancer: A real‐world multicenter study , 2022, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[5]  C. Kirisits,et al.  Prognostic implications of uterine cervical cancer regression during chemoradiation evaluated by the T-score in the multicenter XXX study. , 2022, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[6]  Jeong-Won Lee,et al.  Frequency of Mismatch Repair Deficiency/High Microsatellite Instability and Its Role as a Predictive Biomarker of Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Gynecologic Cancers , 2021, Cancer research and treatment.

[7]  L. Stalpers,et al.  Primary or adjuvant chemoradiotherapy for cervical cancer with intraoperative lymph node metastasis - A review. , 2021, Cancer treatment reviews.

[8]  Longyun Chen,et al.  PD-L1, Mismatch Repair Protein, and NTRK Immunohistochemical Expression in Cervical Small Cell Neuroendocrine Carcinoma , 2021, Frontiers in Oncology.

[9]  F. Landoni,et al.  The annual recurrence risk model for tailored surveillance strategy in patients with cervical cancer. , 2021, European journal of cancer.

[10]  D. Aoki,et al.  Cancer of the cervix uteri: 2021 update , 2021, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[11]  P. Morice,et al.  Long-term oncological safety of sentinel lymph node biopsy in early-stage cervical cancer: A post-hoc analysis of SENTICOL I and SENTICOL II cohorts. , 2021, Gynecologic oncology.

[12]  J. Overgaard,et al.  Hypoxic gene expression is a prognostic factor for disease free survival in a cohort of locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the uterine cervix , 2021, Acta oncologica.

[13]  A. Gavin,et al.  The European cancer burden in 2020: Incidence and mortality estimates for 40 countries and 25 major cancers , 2021, European journal of cancer.

[14]  F. Heredia,et al.  Conization and lymph node evaluation in low-risk cervical cancer. Is it time to avoid radical surgery? Retrospective series and literature review. , 2021, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[15]  K. Hua,et al.  Identification of a novel six‐gene signature with potential prognostic and therapeutic value in cervical cancer , 2021, Cancer medicine.

[16]  P. T. Jensen,et al.  From FIGO-2009 to FIGO-2018 in women with early-stage cervical cancer; Does the revised staging reflect risk groups? , 2021, Gynecologic oncology.

[17]  C. Della Rocca,et al.  Radical Surgery After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Locally Advanced Neuroendocrine Cancer of the Cervix , 2021, AntiCancer Research.

[18]  E. Bruera,et al.  Medical management of malignant bowel obstruction in patients with advanced cancer: 2021 MASCC guideline update , 2021, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[19]  A. Martin Martinez,et al.  Post-Conization FIGO stage IA1 squamous cell cervical carcinoma; is hysterectomy necessary? , 2021, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[20]  J. Teixeira,et al.  Conservative treatment of microinvasive squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix stage IA1: Defining conization height to an optimal oncological outcome , 2021, PloS one.

[21]  Jian Chen,et al.  Prognostic factors and treatment of neuroendocrine tumors of the uterine cervix based on the FIGO 2018 staging system: a single-institution study of 172 patients , 2021, PeerJ.

[22]  A. Yapar,et al.  Long-term outcomes of cervical cancer patients with complete metabolic response after definitive chemoradiotherapy , 2021, Journal of gynecologic oncology.

[23]  G. Scambia,et al.  The role of semiquantitative evaluation of lympho-vascular space invasion in early stage cervical cancer patients. , 2021, Gynecologic oncology.

[24]  F. Strasser,et al.  Cancer cachexia in adult patients: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines☆ , 2021, ESMO open.

[25]  M. Kamdar,et al.  Essential Package of Palliative Care for Women With Cervical Cancer: Responding to the Suffering of a Highly Vulnerable Population , 2021, JCO global oncology.

[26]  T. Ind Overview of fertility sparing treatments for cervical cancer. , 2021, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[27]  A. Sundin,et al.  Interobserver agreement of transvaginal ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in local staging of cervical cancer , 2021, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[28]  F. Amant,et al.  Fertility sparing treatment in cervical cancer management in pregnancy. , 2021, Best practice & research. Clinical obstetrics & gynaecology.

[29]  E. Sala,et al.  Staging, recurrence and follow-up of uterine cervical cancer using MRI: Updated Guidelines of the European Society of Urogenital Radiology after revised FIGO staging 2018 , 2021, European Radiology.

[30]  M. Washington,et al.  The new (Version 9) American Joint Committee on Cancer tumor, node, metastasis staging for cervical cancer , 2021, CA: a cancer journal for clinicians.

[31]  S. Scasso,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pregnant patients with cervical cancer: a Latin-American multicenter study , 2021, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[32]  A. Nica,et al.  Cervical conization and lymph node assessment for early stage low-risk cervical cancer , 2021, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[33]  F. Landoni,et al.  Oncologic and obstetric outcomes after simple conization for fertility-sparing surgery in FIGO 2018 stage IB1 cervical cancer , 2021, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[34]  Tsuyoshi Saito,et al.  The validity of the subsequent pregnancy index score for fertility-sparing trachelectomy in early-stage cervical cancer. , 2021, Fertility and sterility.

[35]  C. Faloppa,et al.  Predictive Factors for Residual Disease After Conization in Cervical Cancer , 2021, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[36]  Young Seok Kim,et al.  Optimal treatment strategies for small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: A retrospective multi-center study (KROG 19-03). , 2021, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[37]  N. Buza HER2 Testing and Reporting in Endometrial Serous Carcinoma: Practical Recommendations for HER2 Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescent In Situ Hybridization: Proceedings of the ISGyP Companion Society Session at the 2020 USCAP Annual Meeting. , 2021, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[38]  Hui Wang,et al.  Medical Management of Inoperable Malignant Bowel Obstruction , 2020, The Annals of pharmacotherapy.

[39]  P. Dundr,et al.  Tumour-free distance: a novel prognostic marker in patients with early-stage cervical cancer treated by primary surgery , 2020, British Journal of Cancer.

[40]  K. Hua,et al.  Management of Cervical Cancer in Pregnant Women: A Multi-Center Retrospective Study in China , 2020, Frontiers in Medicine.

[41]  Y. Shibamoto,et al.  The importance of choosing the right strategy to treat small cell carcinoma of the cervix: a comparative analysis of treatments , 2020, BMC Cancer.

[42]  Manjulika Das WHO launches strategy to accelerate elimination of cervical cancer. , 2020, The Lancet. Oncology.

[43]  Huanwen Wu,et al.  Oncologic and obstetric outcomes after conization for adenocarcinoma in situ or stage IA1 cervical cancer , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[44]  M. Koual,et al.  Does a pre-operative conization improve disease-free survival in early-stage cervical cancer? , 2020, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[45]  J. Meuwly,et al.  Survival of the fetus: cervical cancer and pregnancy, a challenging combination , 2020, The Lancet.

[46]  C. Kirisits,et al.  Clinical and imaging findings in cervical cancer and their impact on FIGO and TNM staging - An analysis from the EMBRACE study. , 2020, Gynecologic oncology.

[47]  J. Fujimoto,et al.  Evaluation of PARP and PDL-1 as potential therapeutic targets for women with high-grade neuroendocrine carcinomas of the cervix , 2020, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[48]  L. Mileshkin,et al.  A systematic review of the impact of contemporary treatment modalities for cervical cancer on women’s self-reported health-related quality of life , 2020, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[49]  P. A. Futreal,et al.  Comparative genomics of high grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix , 2020, PloS one.

[50]  R. Bharathan,et al.  Sentinel lymph node biopsy alone in the management of early cervical carcinoma , 2020, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[51]  C. Sonetto,et al.  Primary conization overcomes the risk of developing local recurrence following laparoscopic radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer , 2020, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[52]  M. Plante,et al.  Simple vaginal trachelectomy in women with early-stage low-risk cervical cancer who wish to preserve fertility: the new standard of care? , 2020, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[53]  Jingxin Cheng,et al.  Prognostic Factors and Local Treatment Modalities of Small-Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix: An Analysis According to the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics Stage , 2020, Cancer management and research.

[54]  T. Turan,et al.  Primary leiomyosarcoma of the uterine cervix: report of 4 cases, systematic review, and meta-analysis , 2020, Tumori.

[55]  Scott A Harvey,et al.  A fight-and-flight for life: A rare case of advanced cervical cancer in pregnancy , 2020, Gynecologic oncology reports.

[56]  Yudong Wang,et al.  A case of successful maintained pregnancy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus radical surgery for stage IB3 cervical cancer diagnosed at 13 weeks , 2020, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[57]  E. Darai,et al.  Invasive and in situ cervical cancer associated with pregnancy: analysis from the French cancer network (CALG: Cancer Associé à La Grossesse) , 2020, Clinical and Translational Oncology.

[58]  Jason D. Wright,et al.  Prognostic significance of lymphovascular space invasion for stage IA1 and IA2 cervical cancer , 2020, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[59]  F. Roila,et al.  Cancer-related fatigue: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis and treatment. , 2020, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[60]  C. Bourgioti,et al.  Imaging of Gynecologic Malignancy in a Reproductive Age Female: Cancer During Pregnancy. , 2020, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[61]  P. Casali,et al.  Rationale of the rare cancer list: a consensus paper from the Joint Action on Rare Cancers (JARC) of the European Union (EU) , 2020, ESMO Open.

[62]  A. Mandić,et al.  Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced cervical cancer in pregnancy-Review of the literature. , 2020, Journal of B.U.ON. : official journal of the Balkan Union of Oncology.

[63]  G. Vorgias,et al.  Abdominal radical trachelectomy during pregnancy: A systematic review of the literature. , 2020, Journal of gynecology obstetrics and human reproduction.

[64]  M. E. Leão,et al.  Evaluation of uterine cervical cancer in pregnancy: A cross-sectional study. , 2020, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[65]  F. Landoni,et al.  European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for surgical treatment of cervical cancer , 2020, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[66]  Jacques Ferlay,et al.  Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis , 2019, The Lancet. Global health.

[67]  S. Vesely,et al.  Incorporation of whole pelvic radiation into treatment of stage IVB cervical cancer: A novel treatment strategy. , 2019, Gynecologic oncology.

[68]  K. Tanderup,et al.  Evaluation of a new prognostic tumor score in locally advanced cervical cancer integrating clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging. , 2019, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[69]  Anna Lee,et al.  Primary sarcoma of the cervix: an analysis of patient and tumor characteristics, treatment patterns, and outcomes , 2019, Journal of gynecologic oncology.

[70]  M. Fumagalli,et al.  Gynecologic cancers in pregnancy: guidelines based on a third international consensus meeting. , 2019, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[71]  A. Giordano,et al.  Cervical cancer in pregnancy: Analysis of the literature and innovative approaches , 2019, Journal of cellular physiology.

[72]  D. Gaffney,et al.  216 The deleterious survival impact of positive lymph nodes in cervical cancer: implications of the new FIGO staging system , 2019, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[73]  S. Podgaec,et al.  Consensus for vaginal stenosis prevention in patients submitted to pelvic radiotherapy , 2019, PloS one.

[74]  M. Dimopoulos,et al.  Taxanes during pregnancy in cervical cancer: A systematic review and pooled analysis. , 2019, Cancer treatment reviews.

[75]  Dongcheng Wu,et al.  Diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer in pregnant women , 2019, Cancer medicine.

[76]  I. Haldorsen,et al.  What Is the Role of Imaging at Primary Diagnostic Work-Up in Uterine Cervical Cancer? , 2019, Current Oncology Reports.

[77]  Tsuyoshi Saito,et al.  Obstetrical prognosis of patients who underwent vaginal radical trachelectomy during pregnancy , 2019, The journal of obstetrics and gynaecology research.

[78]  Liangsheng Fan,et al.  Treatment and clinical outcomes of cervical cancer during pregnancy. , 2019, Annals of translational medicine.

[79]  J. Ryan,et al.  Incidence, management, and sequelae of ureteric obstruction in women with cervical cancer , 2019, Supportive Care in Cancer.

[80]  Zheyan Liu,et al.  Elevated PD-L1 expression predicts poor survival outcomes in patients with cervical cancer , 2019, Cancer Cell International.

[81]  Jia-xin Yang,et al.  Uterine Adenosarcoma: A Retrospective 12-Year Single-Center Study , 2019, Front. Oncol..

[82]  Xiaoxin Ma,et al.  Prognostic factors and outcomes of early-stage small cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: 37 cases from a single center , 2019, PeerJ.

[83]  J. Bento,et al.  Surgical Management of Malignant Intestinal Obstruction: Outcome and Prognostic Factors. , 2019, Chirurgia.

[84]  J. Berek,et al.  Revised FIGO staging for carcinoma of the cervix uteri , 2019, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[85]  J. Ordi,et al.  HPV-negative tumors of the uterine cervix , 2019, Modern Pathology.

[86]  B. van Calster,et al.  Characteristics of patients with cervical cancer during pregnancy: a multicenter matched cohort study. An initiative from the International Network on Cancer, Infertility and Pregnancy , 2019, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[87]  G. Eleje,et al.  Palliative interventions for controlling vaginal bleeding in advanced cervical cancer. , 2019, The Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

[88]  L. Lecointre,et al.  Type B Laparoscopic Radical Trachelectomy with Uterine Artery Preservation for Stage IB1 Cervical Cancer. , 2019, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[89]  P. Ramirez,et al.  Conservative management of cervical cancer in pregnancy , 2019, International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.

[90]  P. Dundr,et al.  A prospective multicenter trial on sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer (SENTIX) , 2019, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[91]  I. Konishi,et al.  Validation of the 2018 FIGO cervical cancer staging system. , 2019, Gynecologic oncology.

[92]  C. Gilks,et al.  Issues in the Differential Diagnosis of Uterine Low-grade Endometrioid Carcinoma, Including Mixed Endometrial Carcinomas: Recommendations from the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists , 2018, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[93]  M. Dietrich,et al.  Development and Validation of the Lymphedema Symptom Intensity and Distress Survey-Lower Limb. , 2018, Lymphatic research and biology.

[94]  C. Michener,et al.  Radical Trachelectomy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer , 2018, Current Treatment Options in Oncology.

[95]  V. Gebski,et al.  Minimally Invasive versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[96]  Y. Huang,et al.  Independent risk factors for ovarian metastases in stage IA‐IIB cervical carcinoma , 2018, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[97]  G. Scambia,et al.  Prospective multimodal imaging assessment of locally advanced cervical cancer patients administered by chemoradiation followed by radical surgery—the “PRICE“ study 2: role of conventional and DW-MRI , 2018, European Radiology.

[98]  M. Paschoini,et al.  Chemotherapy for cervical cancer in pregnancy , 2018, Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology : the journal of the Institute of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[99]  L. Denny,et al.  FIGO Cancer Report 2018 , 2018, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[100]  A. Fagotti,et al.  Locally advanced cervical cancer complicating pregnancy: A case of competing risks from the Catholic University of the Sacred Heart in Rome. , 2018, Gynecologic oncology.

[101]  Kiyoko Kato,et al.  Infertility after abdominal trachelectomy , 2018, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[102]  C. Bourgioti,et al.  Abdominal Radical Trachelectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer During Pregnancy: A Provocative Surgical Approach. Overview of the Literature and a Single-Institute Experience , 2018, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[103]  Chin-Chen Chang,et al.  Comparison of single and tandem ureteral stenting for malignant ureteral obstruction: a prospective study of 104 patients , 2018, European Radiology.

[104]  P. Ramirez,et al.  Simple trachelectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy as a viable treatment option in pregnant patients with stage IB1 (≥2 cm) cervical cancer: Bridging the gap to fetal viability. , 2018, Gynecologic oncology.

[105]  C. Haie-meder,et al.  Multimodal Management of Locally Advanced Neuroendocrine Cervical Carcinoma: A Single Institution Experience , 2018, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[106]  A. Neugut,et al.  Trends in Use and Survival Associated With Fertility-Sparing Trachelectomy for Young Women With Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. , 2018, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[107]  C. Paul,et al.  Outcomes for women without conventional treatment for stage 1A (microinvasive) carcinoma of the cervix , 2018, The Australian & New Zealand journal of obstetrics & gynaecology.

[108]  Richard Pötter,et al.  The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Cervical Cancer , 2018, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[109]  C. Tempfer,et al.  Neuroendocrine carcinoma of the cervix: a systematic review of the literature , 2018, BMC Cancer.

[110]  R. Pötter,et al.  The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Cervical Cancer , 2018, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[111]  R. Pötter,et al.  The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology/European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology/European Society of Pathology guidelines for the management of patients with cervical cancer. , 2018, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[112]  C. Simone,et al.  Patterns of Care for Stage IA Cervical Cancer: Use of Definitive Radiation Therapy Versus Hysterectomy , 2018, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[113]  G. Scambia,et al.  PRospective Imaging of CErvical cancer and neoadjuvant treatment (PRICE) study: role of ultrasound to predict partial response in locally advanced cervical cancer patients undergoing chemoradiation and radical surgery , 2018, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[114]  R. Angioli,et al.  Assessment of Quality of Life and Urinary and Sexual Function After Radical Hysterectomy in Long-Term Cervical Cancer Survivors , 2018, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[115]  F. Amant,et al.  Feasibility of whole-body diffusion-weighted MRI for detection of primary tumour, nodal and distant metastases in women with cancer during pregnancy: a pilot study , 2018, European Radiology.

[116]  O. Aboumarzouk,et al.  Malignant ureteric obstruction decompression: how much gain for how much pain? A narrative review , 2018, Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine.

[117]  Kiyoko Kato,et al.  Surgical treatment and outcome of early invasive adenocarcinoma of the uterine cervix (FIGO stage IA1) , 2018, Asia-Pacific journal of clinical oncology.

[118]  K. Yoshihara,et al.  The Safety and Effectiveness of Abdominal Radical Trachelectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer During Pregnancy , 2018, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[119]  E. Miyagi,et al.  Radiation Therapy for Patients with Bone Metastasis from Uterine Cervical Cancer: Its Role and Optimal Radiation Regimen for Palliative Care. , 2018, Anticancer research.

[120]  H. Chung,et al.  Can simple trachelectomy or conization show comparable survival rate compared with radical trachelectomy in IA1 cervical cancer patients with lymphovascular space invasion who wish to save fertility? A systematic review and guideline recommendation , 2018, PloS one.

[121]  M. Delgado-Rodríguez,et al.  Systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2017, Medicina intensiva.

[122]  T. Turan,et al.  Therapy Modalities, Prognostic Factors, and Outcome of the Primary Cervical Carcinosarcoma: Meta-analysis of Extremely Rare Tumor of Cervix , 2017, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[123]  M. Kohler,et al.  Why do we continue to overtreat stage Ia carcinoma of the cervix? , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[124]  N. Siddiqui,et al.  The Current Burden of Follow-up of Stage 1A1 Cervical Cancer , 2017, Journal of lower genital tract disease.

[125]  P. Phillips,et al.  Hysterectomy With Radiotherapy or Chemotherapy or Both for Women With Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer , 2017, Clinical nurse specialist CNS.

[126]  K. Matsuo,et al.  Risk of metachronous ovarian cancer after ovarian conservation in young women with stage I cervical cancer , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[127]  E. Fields,et al.  Increasing age predicts poor cervical cancer prognosis with subsequent effect on treatment and overall survival. , 2017, Brachytherapy.

[128]  K. Matsuo,et al.  Significance of uterine corpus tumor invasion in early-stage cervical cancer. , 2017, European journal of surgical oncology : the journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and the British Association of Surgical Oncology.

[129]  N. Horowitz,et al.  Management and outcome of cervical cancer diagnosed in pregnancy , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[130]  A. Gadducci,et al.  Neuroendrocrine tumors of the uterine cervix: A therapeutic challenge for gynecologic oncologists. , 2017, Gynecologic oncology.

[131]  J. Teixeira,et al.  Analysis of Conservative Surgical Treatment and Prognosis of Microinvasive Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Cervix Stage IA1: Results of Follow-Up to 20 Years , 2017, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[132]  X. Fang,et al.  Clear Cell Carcinoma of the Uterine Cervix: A Clinical and Pathological Analysis of 47 Patients Without Intrauterine Diethylstilbestrol Exposure , 2017, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[133]  Ying Zhang,et al.  Abdominal radical trachelectomy guided by sentinel lymph node biopsy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with tumors >2 cm , 2016, Oncotarget.

[134]  Chao Lu,et al.  Retrospective study , 2016, Medicine.

[135]  A. Fyles,et al.  Follow-up for cervical cancer: a Program in Evidence-Based Care systematic review and clinical practice guideline update. , 2016, Current oncology.

[136]  E. Bruera,et al.  Retrospective review of symptoms and palliative care interventions in women with advanced cervical cancer. , 2015, Gynecologic oncology.

[137]  James Java,et al.  Nomograms Predicting Progression-Free Survival, Overall Survival, and Pelvic Recurrence in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer Developed From an Analysis of Identifiable Prognostic Factors in Patients From NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Randomized Trials of Chemoradiotherapy. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[138]  N. deSouza,et al.  A literature review of the association between diffusion-weighted MRI derived apparent diffusion coefficient and tumour aggressiveness in pelvic cancer. , 2015, Cancer treatment reviews.

[139]  J. Ordi,et al.  HPV‐negative carcinoma of the uterine cervix: a distinct type of cervical cancer with poor prognosis , 2015, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[140]  J. Coebergh,et al.  Second primary cancers in survivors of cervical cancer in The Netherlands: Implications for prevention and surveillance. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[141]  P. Jacobsen,et al.  Validation of the Distress Thermometer worldwide: state of the science , 2014, Psycho-oncology.

[142]  A. Yapar,et al.  Treatment outcomes of patients with cervical cancer with complete metabolic responses after definitive chemoradiotherapy , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[143]  G. Scambia,et al.  Long-term prospective longitudinal evaluation of emotional distress and quality of life in cervical cancer patients who remained disease-free 2-years from diagnosis , 2013, BMC Cancer.

[144]  L. Ramondetta What is the appropriate approach to treating women with incurable cervical cancer? , 2013, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[145]  M. Zikan,et al.  Early-stage cervical cancer: tumor delineation by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound - a European multicenter trial. , 2013, Gynecologic oncology.

[146]  S. Beriwal,et al.  Complete Metabolic Response After Definitive Radiation Therapy for Cervical Cancer: Patterns and Factors Predicting for Recurrence , 2012 .

[147]  G. Thomas,et al.  Cancer of the cervix uteri , 2012, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[148]  G. Kenter,et al.  Prognostic significance of low volume sentinel lymph node disease in early-stage cervical cancer. , 2012, Gynecologic oncology.

[149]  G. Scambia,et al.  Quality of life and emotional distress in early stage and locally advanced cervical cancer patients: a prospective, longitudinal study. , 2012, Gynecologic oncology.

[150]  E. Mohammadi,et al.  Barriers and facilitators related to the implementation of a physiological track and trigger system: A systematic review of the qualitative evidence , 2017, International journal for quality in health care : journal of the International Society for Quality in Health Care.

[151]  P. Gehrig,et al.  Neuroendocrine tumors of the gynecologic tract: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) clinical document. , 2011, Gynecologic oncology.

[152]  O. Abulafia,et al.  Hydronephrosis as a Prognostic Indicator of Survival in Advanced Cervix Cancer , 2011, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[153]  B. K. Park,et al.  Prognostic significance of MRI-detected bladder muscle and/or serosal invasion in patients with cervical cancer treated with radiotherapy. , 2010, The British journal of radiology.

[154]  C. Atkinson,et al.  The malignant psoas syndrome revisited: case report, mechanisms, and current therapeutic options. , 2010, Journal of palliative medicine.

[155]  T. Oliver,et al.  Follow-up for women after treatment for cervical cancer: a systematic review. , 2009, Gynecologic oncology.

[156]  W. Aulitzky,et al.  Subkutane Drainage zur Behandlung des malignen Lymphödems in der palliativen Situation nach Versagen der komplexen physikalischen Entstauungstherapie , 2009 .

[157]  R. Dienstmann,et al.  Palliative percutaneous nephrostomy in recurrent cervical cancer: a retrospective analysis of 50 consecutive cases. , 2008, Journal of pain and symptom management.

[158]  A. Sood,et al.  Malignant mixed mullerian tumor (MMMT) of the cervix. , 2005, Gynecologic oncology.

[159]  R. Fisher,et al.  Significance of tumor volume and corpus uteri invasion in cervical cancer patients treated by radiotherapy , 2004, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[160]  E. Bruera,et al.  Palliative Management of Malignant Bowel Obstruction , 2002, International Journal of Gynecologic Cancer.

[161]  C. Dykewicz Summary of the Guidelines for Preventing Opportunistic Infections among Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Recipients. , 2001, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[162]  P. Clement,et al.  Malignant Mullerian Mixed Tumors of the Uterine Cervix: A Report of Nine Cases of a Neoplasm With Morphology Often Different From Its Counterpart in the Corpus , 1998, International journal of gynecological pathology : official journal of the International Society of Gynecological Pathologists.

[163]  S. Leeder,et al.  A population based study , 1993, The Medical journal of Australia.

[164]  V. Kahanpaa [Radiotherapy of cervical cancer]. , 1952, Suomen laakarilehti. Finlands lakartidning.

[165]  M. Hruda,et al.  Individualization of surgical management of cervical cancer stages IA1, IA2. , 2019, Ceska gynekologie.

[166]  Shengjie Li,et al.  Recent Advances , 2018, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications.

[167]  Dennis Andersson,et al.  A retrospective cohort study , 2018 .

[168]  M. Stoler,et al.  A systematic review and meta-analysis on the attribution of human papillomavirus (HPV) in neuroendocrine cancers of the cervix. , 2018, Gynecologic oncology.

[169]  A. Judge,et al.  A RETROSPECTIVE SINGLE-CENTRE COHORT STUDY , 2017 .

[170]  Carcinoma of the Cervix Histopathology Reporting Guide , 2016 .

[171]  Si-meng Jiao,et al.  The negative conversion of high-risk human papillomavirus and its performance in surveillance of cervical cancer after treatment: a retrospective study , 2016, Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics.

[172]  Naoki Ishiguro,et al.  A MULTICENTRE STUDY , 2010 .

[173]  M. Benjapibal,et al.  Cervical cancer in pregnancy. , 2010 .

[174]  M. Jung,et al.  Small cell carcinoma of the uterine cervix: clinicopathologic study of 20 cases in a single center. , 2009, European journal of gynaecological oncology.

[175]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Systematic Review of the Literature , 2021, Adherence to Antiretroviral Therapy among Perinatal Women in Guyana.