Enabling Personal Knowledge Management with Collaborative and Semantic Technologies

CON T E N T S NEX T PAGE > NEX T ART I C L E > < PRE V I OUS PAGE EDITOR’S SUMMARY Personal knowledge management (PKM) has come to be a central and critical element in the spectrum of knowledge management. The context and control of knowledge management is shifting from global and organizational levels to communities and ultimately to individuals. In developing a model for managing personal intellectual capital, two basic issues stand out. First, we must attend to the broad context of the individual represented on social networks, collaborative environments and other channels. Second, individuals should assume ownership, active management and control over information about themselves by building a formal PKM profile. We can collect elements of our personal information, aided by semantic and knowledge technologies for discovery and normalization, to compile and manage as our own intellectual capital. Work in progress at Kent State University has highlighted important lessons in personal knowledge management, including the foundational role of semantics and the need for a standard definition for a personal data model.

[1]  Verna Allee,et al.  The Knowledge Evolution: Expanding Organizational Intelligence , 1997 .

[2]  Matthias Jarke,et al.  The Web 2.0 Driven SECI Model Based Learning Process , 2007, Seventh IEEE International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT 2007).

[3]  Hans-Dieter Evers,et al.  Knowledge hubs and knowledge clusters: Designing a knowledge architecture for development. , 2008 .

[4]  Janis Grundspenkis,et al.  Agent based approach for organization and personal knowledge modelling: knowledge management perspective , 2007, J. Intell. Manuf..

[5]  Vincent S. Lai,et al.  Organizational Assimilation of Collaborative Information Technologies: Global Comparisons , 2007, 2007 40th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'07).

[6]  E. Mansfield,et al.  The Production and Distribution of Knowledge in the United States. , 1963 .

[7]  David Pauleen Personal knowledge management: Putting the "person" back into the knowledge equation , 2009, Online Inf. Rev..

[8]  Moria Levy,et al.  WEB 2.0 implications on knowledge management , 2009, J. Knowl. Manag..

[9]  James Stewart,et al.  The co-evolution of society and multimedia technology: issues in predicting the future innovation and use of a ubiquitous technology , 1998 .

[10]  Thomas H. Davenport,et al.  Book review:Working knowledge: How organizations manage what they know. Thomas H. Davenport and Laurence Prusak. Harvard Business School Press, 1998. $29.95US. ISBN 0‐87584‐655‐6 , 1998 .

[11]  M. Narasimham,et al.  The economics of knowledge , 2003, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Manag..

[12]  Daniel Andriessen,et al.  Making Sense of Intellectual Capital , 2004 .

[13]  Kirby Wright,et al.  Personal knowledge management: supporting individual knowledge worker performance , 2005 .

[14]  Nermien Al-Ali,et al.  Comprehensive Intellectual Capital Management: Step-by-Step , 2003 .