Influence of Growth Phase on Adhesion Kinetics of Escherichia coli D21g

ABSTRACT The influence of bacterial growth stage and the evolution of surface macromolecules on cell adhesion have been examined by using a mutant of Escherichia coli K-12. To better understand the adhesion kinetics of bacteria in the mid-exponential and stationary growth phases under flow conditions, deposition experiments were conducted in a well-controlled radial stagnation point flow (RSPF) system. Complementary cell characterization techniques were conducted in combination with the RSPF experiments to evaluate the hydrophobicity, electrophoretic mobility, size, and titratable surface charge of the cells in the two growth phases considered. It was observed that cells in stationary phase were notably more adhesive than those in mid-exponential phase. This behavior is attributed to the high degree of local charge heterogeneity on the outer membranes of stationary-phase cells, which results in decreased electrostatic repulsion between the cells and a quartz surface. The mid-exponential-phase cells, on the other hand, have a more uniform charge distribution on the outer membrane, resulting in greater electrostatic repulsion and, subsequently, less adhesion. Our results suggest that the macromolecules responsible for this phenomenon are outer membrane-bound proteins and lipopolysaccharide-associated functional groups.

[1]  A. Zehnder,et al.  The isoelectric point of bacteria as an indicator for the presence of cell surface polymers that inhibit adhesion. , 1995 .

[2]  P. Bishop,et al.  Comparison of extraction methods for quantifying extracellular polymers in biofilms , 1999 .

[3]  Z. Adamczyk,et al.  Kinetics of particle deposition in the oblique impinging jet cell. , 2001, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[4]  Margot Vigeant,et al.  Oriented Adhesion of Escherichia coli to Polystyrene Particles , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[5]  Arie H. Havelaar,et al.  Guidelines: the current position , 2001 .

[6]  Baikun Li,et al.  Bacterial adhesion to glass and metal-oxide surfaces. , 2004, Colloids and surfaces. B, Biointerfaces.

[7]  Jon Chorover,et al.  Spectroscopic study of extracellular polymeric substances from Bacillus subtilis: aqueous chemistry and adsorption effects. , 2004, Biomacromolecules.

[8]  R. Carlson,et al.  Lipid A and O‐chain modifications cause Rhizobium lipopolysaccharides to become hydrophobic during bacteroid development , 2001, Molecular microbiology.

[9]  H. Nikaido Molecular Basis of Bacterial Outer Membrane Permeability Revisited , 2003, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[10]  William Wiley Navarre,et al.  Surface Proteins of Gram-Positive Bacteria and Mechanisms of Their Targeting to the Cell Wall Envelope , 1999, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[11]  H. Nikaido,et al.  Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability. , 1985, Microbiological reviews.

[12]  Ivanov AIu,et al.  [Relation between the damaging effect of surface-active compounds on Escherichia coli cells and the phase of culture growth]. , 1989 .

[13]  D. Fortin,et al.  The effect of growth phase on proton and metal adsorption by Bacillus subtilis , 2001 .

[14]  S. Cooper,et al.  The influence of thrombus components in mediating bacterial adhesion to biomaterials , 2000, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[15]  R. Briandet,et al.  Listeria monocytogenes Scott A: Cell Surface Charge, Hydrophobicity, and Electron Donor and Acceptor Characteristics under Different Environmental Growth Conditions , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[16]  S. Tsuneda,et al.  Extracellular polymeric substances responsible for bacterial adhesion onto solid surface. , 2003, FEMS microbiology letters.

[17]  H. Elwing,et al.  N-Acetyl-l-Cysteine Affects Growth, Extracellular Polysaccharide Production, and Bacterial Biofilm Formation on Solid Surfaces , 2003, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[18]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Kinetics of Colloid Deposition onto Heterogeneously Charged Surfaces in Porous Media. , 1994, Environmental science & technology.

[19]  F. Smith,et al.  COLORIMETRIC METHOD FOR DETER-MINATION OF SUGAR AND RELATED SUBSTANCE , 1956 .

[20]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Bacterial adhesion and transport in porous media: role of the secondary energy minimum. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[21]  E. McGroarty,et al.  Quantitation of metal cations bound to membranes and extracted lipopolysaccharide of Escherichia coli. , 1983, Biochemistry.

[22]  C. Prigent-Combaret,et al.  Developmental pathway for biofilm formation in curli-producing Escherichia coli strains: role of flagella, curli and colanic acid. , 2000, Environmental microbiology.

[23]  K. Otto,et al.  Adhesion of Type 1-Fimbriated Escherichia coli to Abiotic Surfaces Leads to Altered Composition of Outer Membrane Proteins , 2001, Journal of Bacteriology.

[24]  Menachem Elimelech,et al.  Role of Cell Surface Lipopolysaccharides in Escherichia coli K12 adhesion and transport. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[25]  G. Georgiou,et al.  Evaluating the interaction of bacteria with biomaterials using atomic force microscopy. , 1998, Journal of biomaterials science. Polymer edition.

[26]  Bruce A. Macler,et al.  Current knowledge on groundwater microbial pathogens and their control , 2000 .

[27]  R. Ottewill,et al.  Electrophoretic studies on polystyrene latices , 1972 .

[28]  T. Onstott,et al.  Examining bacterial transport in intact cores from Oyster, Virginia: Effect of sedimentary facies type on bacterial breakthrough and retention , 2000 .

[29]  T. Camesano,et al.  Role of lipopolysaccharides in the adhesion, retention, and transport of Escherichia coli JM109. , 2003, Environmental science & technology.

[30]  J. Sambrook,et al.  Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual , 2001 .

[31]  A. Srivastava,et al.  Influence of growth and environmental conditions on cell surface hydrophobicity of Pseudomonas fluorescens in non-specific adhesion. , 1999, Canadian journal of microbiology.

[32]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Effects of cell surface damage on surface properties and adhesion of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. , 2001, Journal of microbiological methods.

[33]  M. Fletcher,et al.  Alterations in Adhesion, Transport, and Membrane Characteristics in an Adhesion-Deficient Pseudomonad , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[34]  S. Levy,et al.  Development of an Adhesion Assay and Characterization of an Adhesion-Deficient Mutant of Pseudomonas fluorescens , 1990, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[35]  M. Bellon-Fontaine,et al.  Listeria monocytogenes LO28: Surface Physicochemical Properties and Ability To Form Biofilms at Different Temperatures and Growth Phases , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[36]  G. Georgiou,et al.  Molecular determinants of bacterial adhesion monitored by atomic force microscopy. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  S. Asikainen,et al.  Bacterial adhesion of Actinobacillus actinomycetemcomitans serotypes to titanium implants: SEM evaluation. A preliminary report. , 1999, Journal of periodontology.

[38]  H. C. van der Mei,et al.  Initial adhesion and surface growth of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Pseudomonas aeruginosa on biomedical polymers. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[39]  J. Ramos,et al.  Genetic Analysis of Functions Involved in Adhesion of Pseudomonas putida to Seeds , 2000, Journal of bacteriology.

[40]  J. Pruetz,et al.  Characterization of Leptospiral Outer Membrane Lipoprotein LipL36: Downregulation Associated with Late-Log-Phase Growth and Mammalian Infection , 1998, Infection and Immunity.

[41]  A. A. Arrage,et al.  Cell surface physico chemistry alters biofilm development of Pseudomonas aeruginosa lipopolysaccharide mutants , 1998 .

[42]  Jaeweon Cho,et al.  Effects of natural organic matter and ionic species on membrane surface charge. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[43]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Relative Insignificance of Mineral Grain Zeta Potential to Colloid Transport in Geochemically Heterogeneous Porous Media , 2000 .

[44]  S. Schlecht,et al.  Molecular composition of the outer membrane of Escherichia coli and the importance of protein-lipopolysaccharide interactions , 1980, Archives of Microbiology.

[45]  J. Gregory,et al.  Approximate expressions for retarded van der waals interaction , 1981 .

[46]  M. Elimelech,et al.  Micropatterning Microscopic Charge Heterogeneity on Flat Surfaces for Studying the Interaction between Colloidal Particles and Heterogeneously Charged Surfaces , 2002 .

[47]  R. Kolter,et al.  Green fluorescent protein as a marker for Pseudomonas spp , 1997, Applied and environmental microbiology.

[48]  L. Kotra,et al.  Dynamics of the Lipopolysaccharide Assembly on the Surface of Escherichia coli , 1999 .

[49]  B. Derjaguin,et al.  Theory of the stability of strongly charged lyophobic sols and of the adhesion of strongly charged particles in solutions of electrolytes , 1993 .

[50]  H. Flad,et al.  Biochemistry and cell biology of bacterial endotoxins. , 1996, FEMS immunology and medical microbiology.

[51]  R. Schneider,et al.  Cell Surface Analysis Techniques: What Do Cell Preparation Protocols Do to Cell Surface Properties? , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[52]  Douglas W. Fuerstenau,et al.  Mutual coagulation of colloidal dispersions , 1966 .

[53]  M. M. Bradford A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. , 1976, Analytical biochemistry.

[54]  K. Otto,et al.  The role of type 1 fimbriae in adhesion of Escherichia coli to hydrophilic and hydrophobic surfaces , 1999 .

[55]  Glenn A. Burks,et al.  Macroscopic and Nanoscale Measurements of the Adhesion of Bacteria with Varying Outer Layer Surface Composition , 2003 .

[56]  P. Mañas,et al.  Morphological and Physiological Changes Induced by High Hydrostatic Pressure in Exponential- and Stationary-Phase Cells of Escherichia coli: Relationship with Cell Death , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[57]  Scott J. Hultgren,et al.  Bacterial Adhesins: Common Themes and Variations in Architecture and Assembly , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[58]  Mukul M. Sharma,et al.  Adhesion Forces between E. c oli Bacteria and Biomaterial Surfaces , 1999 .

[59]  T. Onstott,et al.  Simultaneous Transport of Two Bacterial Strains in Intact Cores from Oyster, Virginia: Biological Effects and Numerical Modeling , 2002, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[60]  Brian P. Frank,et al.  Polysaccharides and sticky membrane surfaces: critical ionic effects , 2003 .

[61]  B. Logan,et al.  Contributions of Bacterial Surface Polymers, Electrostatics, and Cell Elasticity to the Shape of AFM Force Curves , 2002 .

[62]  M. W. Hahn,et al.  Deposition and reentrainment of Brownian particles in porous media under unfavorable chemical conditions: some concepts and applications. , 2004, Environmental science & technology.

[63]  Rolf Bos,et al.  Electric double layer interactions in bacterial adhesion to surfaces , 2002 .

[64]  Yang,et al.  Deposition of Oral Bacteria and Polystyrene Particles to Quartz and Dental Enamel in a Parallel Plate and Stagnation Point Flow Chamber. , 1999, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[65]  N. Stuurman,et al.  Use of green fluorescent protein color variants expressed on stable broad-host-range vectors to visualize rhizobia interacting with plants. , 2000, Molecular plant-microbe interactions : MPMI.