The Moderating Role of Power Exercise in B2B E-commerce Adoption Decision

Abstract B2B E-commerce (B2B EC) is a technology that supports relationship between business partners. In adopting such technology, power exercise plays a crucial role. Misunderstood power exercised within B2B EC may generate unrealistic or inaccurate outcomes. Unfortunately, the role of power exercise is nearly ignored in B2B EC adoption literature. In response, using the Resources-Dependency-Theory (RDT) and Diffusion-Innovation-Theory (DIT), this paper argues on the interaction between the influence of innovation characteristics and power exercise, so as to explain B2B EC adoption. This proposition could improve understanding B2B EC adoption and help to resolve inconsistency of findings in the literature.

[1]  W. Powell,et al.  The iron cage revisited institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields , 1983 .

[2]  Viswanath Venkatesh,et al.  Assimilation of Interorganizational Business Process Standards , 2007, Inf. Syst. Res..

[3]  Michael Parent,et al.  Mimetic Isomorphism and Technology Evaluation: Does Imitation Transcend Judgment? , 2002, J. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[4]  Markus Hertwig,et al.  Institutional effects in the adoption of e-business-technology: Evidence from the German automotive supplier industry , 2012, Inf. Organ..

[5]  A. Hillman,et al.  Resource Dependence Theory: A Review , 2009 .

[6]  Youqin Pan,et al.  Adoption model of mobile-enabled systems in supply chain , 2013, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[7]  Joe Sanderson,et al.  Supply Chains and Power Regimes: Toward an Analytic Framework for Managing Extended Networks of Buyer and Supplier Relationships , 2001 .

[8]  Alain Yee-Loong Chong,et al.  Do interorganisational relationships and knowledge-management practices enhance collaborative commerce adoption? , 2013 .

[9]  Princely Ifinedo,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Factors Influencing Internet/E-Business Technologies Adoption by SMEs in Canada , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[10]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Electronic Data Interchange and Small Organizations: Adoption and Impact of Technology , 1995, MIS Q..

[11]  Suzanne Rivard,et al.  Positioning the institutional perspective in information systems research , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[12]  Fang Wu,et al.  Determinants of e-communication adoption: The internal push versus external pull factors , 2005 .

[13]  Nabeel Al-Qirim E-Commerce Innovations in Jordan: Theoretical Model Development and Implications for Small Businesses , 2010, AMCIS.

[14]  Sherah Kurnia,et al.  A Dyadic Model of Interorganizational Systems (IOS) Adoption Maturity , 2008, Proceedings of the 41st Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2008).

[15]  F. Chan,et al.  An empirical investigation of factors affecting e-collaboration diffusion in SMEs , 2012 .

[16]  Richard G. McFarland,et al.  Decomposing Influence Strategies: Argument Structure and Dependence as Determinants of the Effectiveness of Influence Strategies in Gaining Channel Member Compliance , 2005 .

[17]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Inter-organizational information systems adoption – a configuration analysis approach , 2011, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Alemayehu Molla,et al.  eCommerce adoption in developing countries: a model and instrument , 2005, Inf. Manag..

[19]  Mazen Ali,et al.  Exploring Interorganisational Systems (IOS) adoption in Bahrain , 2010 .

[20]  R. Emerson Power-Dependence Relations , 1962, Power in Modern Societies.

[21]  Iftekhar Hasan,et al.  Effects of Institutional Pressures on Information Technology Investments: An Empirical Investigation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[22]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Predicting Intention to Adopt Interorganizational Linkages: An Institutional Perspective , 2003, MIS Q..

[23]  Sridhar Narasimhan,et al.  Effects of Relational Factors and Channel Climate on EDI Usage in the Customer-Supplier Relationship , 2005, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[24]  Thompson S. H. Teo,et al.  Institutional pressures and mindful IT management: The case of a container terminal in China , 2009, Inf. Manag..

[25]  Sridhar Narasimhan,et al.  Understanding the Development of IOS-Based Trading Partner Relationships: A Structural Model with Empirical Validation , 2008, J. Organ. Comput. Electron. Commer..

[26]  Joey F. George,et al.  Why aren't organizations adopting virtual worlds? , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[27]  Jin Chen,et al.  E-government adoption in public administration organizations: integrating institutional theory perspective and resource-based view , 2013, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[28]  Hefu Liu,et al.  How Do Mediated and Non-Mediated Power Affect Electronic Supply Chain Management System Adoption? The Mediating Effects of Trust and Institutional Pressures , 2009, Decis. Support Syst..

[29]  António Soares Aguiar,et al.  Why Do Firms Adopt E-Procurement Systems? Using Logistic Regression to Empirically Test a Conceptual Model , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[30]  Akos Nagy Collaboration and Conflict in the Electronic Integration of Supply Networks , 2006, Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS'06).

[31]  S. Counsell,et al.  Assessing the influence of Environmental and CEO Characteristics for Adoption of Information Technology in Organizations , 2012 .

[32]  K. Blois,et al.  The legitimacy of power in business-to-business relationships , 2010 .

[33]  W. C. Benton,et al.  Power Influences in the Supply Chain , 2000 .

[34]  Alain Yee-Loong Chong,et al.  A two-stage analysis of the influences of employee alignment on effecting business-IT alignment , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[35]  W. Scott,et al.  Institutions and Organizations. , 1995 .

[36]  P. Beynon-Davies E-Business , 2004 .

[37]  Charles Chowa,et al.  Organizational and institutional determinants of B2C adoption under shifting environments , 2009, J. Inf. Technol..

[38]  Paul J. Hart,et al.  Power and Trust: Critical Factors in the Adoption and Use of Electronic Data Interchange , 1997 .

[39]  Gary L. Frazier Interorganizational Exchange Behavior in Marketing Channels: A Broadened Perspective , 1983 .

[40]  Alain Yee-Loong Chong,et al.  A SEM-neural network approach for understanding determinants of interorganizational system standard adoption and performances , 2012, Decis. Support Syst..

[41]  John O. Summers,et al.  Interfirm Influence Strategies and Their Application within Distribution Channels , 1984 .

[42]  N. Ismail,et al.  Electronic Commerce Adoption in SME: The Trend of Prior Studies , 2009 .

[43]  Afzaal H. Seyal,et al.  A Preliminary Investigation of E-Commerce Adoption in Small & Medium Enterprises in Brunei , 2003 .

[44]  E. Rogers Diffusion of Innovations , 1962 .

[45]  John O. Summers,et al.  Perceptions of Interfirm Power and its use within a Franchise Channel of Distribution , 1986 .

[46]  Jung P. Shim,et al.  Factors influencing corporate web site adoption: a time-based assessment , 2001, Inf. Manag..

[47]  Juan Rodon,et al.  Analysing IOIS adoption through structural contradictions , 2010, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[48]  Hesham Abusaimeh,et al.  The Impact of Establishing a Governmental Consumer Agency in Jordan towards Expanding the Use of E-business , 2013, Comput. Inf. Sci..

[49]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Research Report: Empirical Test of an EDI Adoption Model , 2001, Inf. Syst. Res..

[50]  Binshan Lin,et al.  Internet-based ICT adoption: evidence from Malaysian SMEs , 2009, Ind. Manag. Data Syst..

[51]  A. Ghobadian,et al.  Knowledge acquisition in supply chain partnerships: The role of power , 2013, International Journal of Production Economics.

[52]  Izak Benbasat,et al.  Organizational Buyers' Adoption and Use of B2B Electronic Marketplaces: Efficiency- and Legitimacy-Oriented Perspectives , 2007, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[53]  Latif Al-Hakim,et al.  The Effect of Inter-Organization Trust and Dependency on E-Procurement Adoption: A Case of Malaysian Manufacturers , 2012, J. Electron. Commer. Organ..

[54]  Eric Abrahamson,et al.  MANAGEMENT FASHION: LIFECYCLES, TRIGGERS, AND COLLECTIVE LEARNING PROCESSES. , 1997 .

[55]  Bongsug Chae,et al.  Information technology and supply chain collaboration: moderating effects of existing relationships between partners , 2005, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[56]  Alain Yee-Loong Chong,et al.  Influence of interorganizational relationships on SMEs' e-business adoption , 2009, Internet Res..

[57]  Esko Penttinen,et al.  Assessing the Effect of External Pressure in Inter-organizational IS Adoption - Case Electronic Invoicing , 2009, WEB.

[58]  Hsin-Yu Shih The dynamics of local and interactive effects on innovation adoption: The case of electronic commerce , 2012 .

[59]  Govindan Marthandan,et al.  Web technology in supply chain: an empirical investigation , 2013, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[60]  K. Provan Recognizing, Measuring, and Interpreting The Potential/Enacted Power Distinction In Organizational Research , 1980 .

[61]  Werner Nienhüser,et al.  Resource dependence theory : How well does it explain behavior of organizations ? , 2008 .

[62]  Tiago Oliveira,et al.  Literature Review of Information Technology Adoption Models at Firm Level , 2011 .

[63]  Anand Jeyaraj,et al.  A review of the predictors, linkages, and biases in IT innovation adoption research , 2006, J. Inf. Technol..

[64]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  The impact of organizational commitment, senior management involvement, and team involvement on strategic information systems planning , 2002, Inf. Manag..

[65]  L. G. Tornatzky,et al.  Innovation characteristics and innovation adoption-implementation: A meta-analysis of findings , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[66]  Ismail Sila,et al.  Factors affecting the adoption of B2B e-commerce technologies , 2013, Electronic Commerce Research.

[67]  Robert M. Davison,et al.  SME adoption of IT: the case of electronic trading systems , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management.

[68]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  The External Control of Organizations. , 1978 .