An evaluation of four measures of adolescents' exposure to cigarette marketing in stores.

This study evaluates four measures of exposure to retail cigarette marketing in relation to adolescent smoking behavior. The measures are (a) shopping frequency in types of stores known to carry more cigarette advertising than other store types, (b) shopping frequency in specific stores that sell cigarettes in the study community, (c) the amount of exposure to cigarette brand impressions in stores where students shopped, and (d) perceived exposure to cigarette advertising. The study combined data from classroom surveys administered to 6th-, 7th-, and 8th-grade students in three California middle schools, and direct store observations quantifying cigarette marketing materials and product placement in stores where students shopped. Logistic regression models were used to examine how each exposure measure related to the odds of ever smoking and susceptibility to smoke, controlling for grade, gender, ethnicity, school performance, unsupervised time, and exposure to household and friend smoking. Frequent exposure to retail cigarette marketing as defined by each of the four measures was independently associated with a significant increase in the odds of ever smoking. All but the measure of exposure to store types was associated with a significant increase in the odds of susceptibility to smoke. Four measures of exposure to retail cigarette marketing may serve equally well to predict adolescent smoking but may vary in cost, complexity, and meaning. Depending on the outcomes of interest, the most useful measure may be a combination of self-reported exposure to types of stores that contain cigarette marketing and perceived exposure to such messages.

[1]  Todd Rogers,et al.  Community Mobilization to Reduce Point-of-Purchase Advertising of Tobacco Products , 1995, Health education quarterly.

[2]  E. Gilpin,et al.  Validation of susceptibility as a predictor of which adolescents take up smoking in the United States. , 1996, Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association.

[3]  Jean Richardson,et al.  After-School Supervision and Adolescent Cigarette Smoking: Contributions of the Setting and Intensity of After-School Self-Care , 1999, Journal of Behavioral Medicine.

[4]  E. Gilpin,et al.  Which adolescent experimenters progress to established smoking in the United States. , 1997, American journal of preventive medicine.

[5]  K. Ribisl,et al.  How tobacco companies ensure prime placement of their advertising and products in stores: interviews with retailers about tobacco company incentive programmes , 2003, Tobacco control.

[6]  J. Unger,et al.  Identification of adolescents at risk for smoking initiation: validation of a measure of susceptibility. , 1997, Addictive behaviors.

[7]  S. Fortmann,et al.  Association of retail tobacco marketing with adolescent smoking. , 2004, American journal of public health.

[8]  A. Ulasevich,et al.  American Legacy Foundation, First Look Report 12. Exposure to Pro-tobacco Messages among Teens and Young Adults , 2003 .

[9]  M. Siegel,et al.  Outdoor tobacco advertising in six Boston neighborhoods. Evaluating youth exposure. , 1998, American journal of preventive medicine.

[10]  Jennifer B. Unger,et al.  Alcohol Advertising Exposure and Adolescent Alcohol Use: A Comparison of Exposure Measures , 2003 .

[11]  S. Fortmann,et al.  Reaching youth at the point of sale: cigarette marketing is more prevalent in stores where adolescents shop frequently , 2004, Tobacco Control.

[12]  K. Ribisl,et al.  Cigarette advertising and promotional strategies in retail outlets: results of a statewide survey in California , 2001, Tobacco control.

[13]  J. Flora,et al.  Seventh graders' self-reported exposure to cigarette marketing and its relationship to their smoking behavior. , 1996, American journal of public health.

[14]  J. Unger,et al.  Measuring exposure to pro- and anti-tobacco marketing among adolescents: intercorrelations among measures and associations with smoking status. , 2001, Journal of health communication.

[15]  K. Cummings,et al.  The cigarette pack as image: new evidence from tobacco industry documents , 2002, Tobacco control.