Rear-end collision warning of connected automated vehicles based on a novel stochastic local multivehicle optimal velocity model.

Studying the rear-end early warning methods of connected automated vehicles (CAVs) is useful for issuing early warnings and reducing traffic accidents. Establishing a corresponding driving model according to CAV characteristics is necessary when designing intelligent decision and control systems, especially for the safety speed threshold. However, since traffic systems are stochastic, there are random factors that influence car-following behavior. Therefore, this study proposes a rear-end collision warning method for CAVs based on a stochastic local multivehicle optimal speed (SLMOV) car-following model. First, the SLMOV model is proposed to characterize the car-following behavior of CAVs. Simultaneously, a stability analysis and parameter estimation method are discussed. Second, the safety distance between the CAVs changes with time because the speed of the rear vehicles satisfies the SLMOV model, which is used to calculate the safety probability of rear-end CAV collisions through an analysis of the driving process. The speed threshold is assessed by controlling the rear-end collision probability. Third, next-generation simulation (NGSIM) data are used in an empirical analysis of a rear-end collision warning method on the basis of a parameter estimation of the SLMOV model. The results present the speed thresholds of vehicles under different braking deceleration levels. Finally, the merits and demerits of fixed-speed and variable-speed adjustment time intervals are compared by considering driving safety and comfort as evaluation indexes. A reasonable CAV adjustment time interval of 0.4 s is determined. This result can be used to help develop a vehicle loading rear-end collision warning system.

[1]  Bin Chen,et al.  Vehicle forward collision warning algorithm based on road friction , 2019, Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment.

[2]  Klaus C. J. Dietmayer,et al.  Situation Assessment of an Autonomous Emergency Brake for Arbitrary Vehicle-to-Vehicle Collision Scenarios , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[3]  Ilkka Norros,et al.  Accident risk of road and weather conditions on different road types. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  Jorge A. Laval,et al.  Statistical inference for two-regime stochastic car-following models , 2020 .

[5]  Hiroyuki Koike,et al.  Rear-End Collision Velocity Reduction System , 2003 .

[6]  R. B. Potts,et al.  Car-Following Theory of Steady-State Traffic Flow , 1959 .

[7]  D. Ngoduy,et al.  Langevin method for a continuous stochastic car-following model and its stability conditions , 2019, Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies.

[8]  Partha S. Roop,et al.  A Formal Approach for Modeling and Simulation of Human Car-Following Behavior , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[9]  M. Griffin,et al.  EVALUATION OF WHOLE-BODY VIBRATION IN VEHICLES , 2002 .

[10]  E. Montroll,et al.  Traffic Dynamics: Studies in Car Following , 1958 .

[11]  Shun-Chung Wang,et al.  Forward collision warning system considering both time-to-collision and safety braking distance , 2013, ICIEA 2013.

[12]  Partha Chakroborty,et al.  CAR-FOLLOWING MODEL BASED ON FUZZY INFERENCE SYSTEM , 1992 .

[13]  H. X. Ge,et al.  Effect of looking backward on traffic flow in a cooperative driving car following model , 2006 .

[14]  Dirk Helbing,et al.  Delays, inaccuracies and anticipation in microscopic traffic models , 2006 .

[15]  Jessica B. Cicchino,et al.  Effectiveness of forward collision warning and autonomous emergency braking systems in reducing front-to-rear crash rates. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[16]  Hyung Chul Kim,et al.  Life Cycle Assessment of Connected and Automated Vehicles: Sensing and Computing Subsystem and Vehicle Level Effects. , 2018, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Hsiao-Hwa Chen,et al.  A Rear-End Collision Risk Evaluation and Control Scheme Using a Bayesian Network Model , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[18]  Tao Chen,et al.  Intelligent Environment-Friendly Vehicles: Concept and Case Studies , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[19]  L. A. Pipes An Operational Analysis of Traffic Dynamics , 1953 .

[20]  Shun-Chung Wang,et al.  Study on vehicle safety distance warning system , 2008, 2008 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Technology.

[21]  Tsuna Sasaki,et al.  A Safety Index for Traffic with Linear Spacing , 1959 .

[22]  Qingfeng Huang,et al.  An adaptive peer-to-peer collision warning system , 2002, Vehicular Technology Conference. IEEE 55th Vehicular Technology Conference. VTC Spring 2002 (Cat. No.02CH37367).

[23]  Wenhu Qin,et al.  Research on a DSRC-Based Rear-End Collision Warning Model , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[24]  Deng Wei An Early-warning Model for Rear-end Accident Occurring in Highway Tunnel Group , 2011 .

[25]  Marco Steinhauser,et al.  Adaptive forward collision warnings: The impact of imperfect technology on behavioral adaptation, warning effectiveness and acceptance. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[26]  Cheol Oh,et al.  A vehicle speed harmonization strategy for minimizing inter-vehicle crash risks. , 2019, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[27]  M R Flynn,et al.  Self-sustained nonlinear waves in traffic flow. , 2008, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[28]  P. G. Gipps,et al.  A behavioural car-following model for computer simulation , 1981 .

[29]  Alireza Talebpour,et al.  Influence of connected and autonomous vehicles on traffic flow stability and throughput , 2016 .

[30]  Rahim F Benekohal,et al.  Comparison of Car-Following Models for Simulation , 1999 .

[31]  R. E. Wilson,et al.  Car-following models: fifty years of linear stability analysis – a mathematical perspective , 2011 .

[32]  John C Hayward,et al.  NEAR-MISS DETERMINATION THROUGH USE OF A SCALE OF DANGER , 1972 .

[33]  Tamer A. ElBatt,et al.  Cooperative collision warning using dedicated short range wireless communications , 2006, VANET '06.

[34]  Joonyoung Kim,et al.  An experimental investigation of a CW/CA system for automobiles using hardware-in-the-loop simulations , 1999, Proceedings of the 1999 American Control Conference (Cat. No. 99CH36251).

[35]  Helbing,et al.  Congested traffic states in empirical observations and microscopic simulations , 2000, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[36]  G. Peng,et al.  Optimal velocity difference model for a car-following theory , 2011 .

[37]  Robert Herman,et al.  Traffic Dynamics: Analysis of Stability in Car Following , 1959 .

[38]  Nakayama,et al.  Dynamical model of traffic congestion and numerical simulation. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[39]  Meng Wang,et al.  Cooperative Car-Following Control: Distributed Algorithm and Impact on Moving Jam Features , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[40]  A. Hamish Jamson,et al.  Potential benefits of an adaptive forward collision warning system , 2008 .

[41]  Ye Li,et al.  Evaluating the safety impact of adaptive cruise control in traffic oscillations on freeways. , 2017, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[42]  Mattias Bengtsson,et al.  Collision Warning with Full Auto Brake and Pedestrian Detection - a practical example of Automatic Emergency Braking , 2010, 13th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[43]  Jos Nijhuis,et al.  Neurocontrol for lateral vehicle guidance , 1993, IEEE Micro.

[44]  Jay A. Farrell,et al.  Magnetometer and differential carrier phase GPS-aided INS for advanced vehicle control , 2003, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..