Numerical Analysis on Aerodynamic Force Generation of Biplane Counter-Flapping Flexible Airfoils

This study explores the effect of chordwise flexible deformation on unsteady aerodynamic characteristics for biplane counter-flapping dual NACA0014 airfoils with various combinations of Reynolds number and reduced frequency. Unsteady laminar viscous flows over duel rigid and flexible airfoils executing counter-plunge motion are computed with time-dependent two-dimensional laminar Reynolds-averaged Navier-Stokes equations coupled with conformal hybrid meshes. The tested Reynolds number with an airfoil characteristic chord length is 10 2 ,10 3 , and 10 4 , and the reduced frequency ranges from 0.5 to 3.5. The dynamic mesh technique is applied to illustrate the flapping deformation modes of the flexible airfoils. To investigate the influence of the chordwise flexure extent on the aerodynamic performance of the flapping airfoils, the present study considers various different curvature deformations of flapping foils with flexure extent ranging from 0 to 0.3 times the chord length at 0.05 intervals. The visualized particle-tracing paths clearly revealed the formation and evolution of leading-edge vortices along the body of the flexible airfoil as it undergoes biplane counter-plunge motion. The generation of thrust-indicative wake structure or the drag-indicated wake structure behind the flexible airfoils depended on the degree of f lexure extent of the airfoil at a fixed range of reduced frequency. The thrust force for each airfoil with biplane counter-flapping mode will be enhanced 6.32% more than that for a rigid single flapping airfoil. Present results show that flexible airfoils with flexure extent 0.25 times the chord length in counter-plunge flapping motion could get maximum propulsive efficiency and produce about 64.65 % more than that of biplane rigid airfoils. The outcome indicates that appropriate flexible biplane flapping flight could not only increase the thrust force, but also boost the propulsive performance.

[1]  Ismail H. Tuncer,et al.  Optimization of Flapping Airfoils for Maximum Thrust and Propulsive Efficiency , 2005 .

[2]  C. M. Dohring,et al.  Experimental and Computational Investigation of the Knoller-Betz Effect , 1998 .

[3]  Laurens E. Howle,et al.  Spring stiffness influence on an oscillating propulsor , 2003 .

[4]  K. Kawachi,et al.  A Numerical Study of Insect Flight , 1998 .

[5]  C. Ellington.  The Aerodynamics of Hovering Insect Flight. I. The Quasi-Steady Analysis , 1984 .

[6]  Sam Heathcote,et al.  Flexible flapping airfoil propulsion at low Reynolds numbers , 2005 .

[7]  K. Isogai,et al.  Effects of Dynamic Stall on Propulsive Efficiency and Thrust of Flapping Airfoil , 1999 .

[8]  Max F. Platzer,et al.  Thrust Generation due to Airfoil Flapping , 1996 .

[9]  Max F. Platzer,et al.  Optimization of Aeroelastic Flapping Motion of Thin Airfoils in a Biplane Configuration for Maximum Thrust , 2007 .

[10]  Max F. Platzer,et al.  Bio-inspired design of flapping-wing micro air vehicles , 2005, The Aeronautical Journal (1968).

[11]  W. Shyy,et al.  Effects of Reynolds Number and Flapping Kinematics on Hovering Aerodynamics , 2007 .

[12]  Michael S. Triantafyllou,et al.  Forces on oscillating foils for propulsion and maneuvering , 2003 .

[13]  Ismail H. Tuncer,et al.  Optimization of Flapping Airfoils for Maximum Thrust , 2003 .

[14]  Mao Sun,et al.  Unsteady aerodynamic force generation by a model fruit fly wing in flapping motion. , 2002, The Journal of experimental biology.

[15]  J.-M. Miao,et al.  Effect of flexure on aerodynamic propulsive efficiency of flapping flexible airfoil , 2006 .

[16]  Franz S. Hover,et al.  Effect of angle of attack profiles in flapping foil propulsion , 2004 .

[17]  Ismail H. Tuncer,et al.  Thrust Generation Caused by Flapping Airfoils in a Biplane Configuration , 2003 .

[18]  Max F. Platzer,et al.  Characteristics of a Plunging Airfoil at Zero Freestream Velocity , 2001 .

[19]  M. Triantafyllou,et al.  Oscillating foils of high propulsive efficiency , 1998, Journal of Fluid Mechanics.

[20]  Z. J. Wang,et al.  Unsteady forces and flows in low Reynolds number hovering flight: two-dimensional computations vs robotic wing experiments , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[21]  John C. Warkentin,et al.  Experimental Aerodynamic Study of Tandem Flapping Membrane Wings , 2007 .

[22]  Sam Heathcote,et al.  Flexible Flapping Airfoil Propulsion at Zero Freestream Velocity , 2003 .

[23]  Sam Heathcote,et al.  Effect of Spanwise Flexibility on Flapping Wing Propulsion , 2006 .

[24]  Ismail H. Tuncer,et al.  Optimization of Flapping Airfoils For Maximum Thrust and Propulsive Efficiency , 2005 .

[25]  M. Damodaran,et al.  Computational Study of Unsteady Low-Reynolds-Number Airfoil Aerodynamics Using Moving Overlapping Meshes , 2008 .

[26]  Anthony Colozza,et al.  Aerodynamics of a Flapping and Pitching Wing Using Simulations and Experiments , 2008 .

[27]  Dragos Viieru,et al.  A Study of Aerodynamics of Low Reynolds Number Flexible Airfoils , 2007 .