An assessment of touchscreens for testing primate food preferences and valuations

Typically, animals’ food preferences are tested manually, which can be both time-consuming and vulnerable to experimenter biases. Given the utility of ascertaining animals’ food preferences for research and husbandry protocols, developing a quick, reliable, and flexible paradigm would be valuable for expediting many research protocols. Therefore, we evaluated the efficacy of using a touchscreen interface to test nonhuman primates’ food preferences and valuations, adapting previously validated manual methods. We tested a nonhuman primate subject with four foods (carrot, cucumber, grape, and turnip). Preference testing followed a pairwise forced choice protocol with pairs of food images presented on a touchscreen: The subject was rewarded with whichever food was selected. All six possible pairwise combinations were presented, with 90 trials per pairing. Second, we measured how hard the subject was willing to work to obtain each of the four foods, allowing us to generate demand curves. For this phase, a single image of a food item was presented on the touchscreen that the subject had to select in order to receive the food, and the number of selections required increased following a quarter-log scale, with ten trials per cost level (1, 2, 3, 6, 10, and 18). These methods allowed us to ascertain the subject’s relative preferences and valuations of the four foods. The success of this touchscreen protocol for testing the subject’s food preferences, from both a practical and a theoretical standpoint, suggests that the protocol should be further validated with other foods with this subject, with other subjects, and with other test items.

[1]  M. Beran Summation and numerousness judgments of sequentially presented sets of items by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 2001, Journal of comparative psychology.

[2]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[3]  C. Nicol,et al.  Reorganization of behaviour in laboratory mice, Mus musculus , with varying cost of access to resources , 1996, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  Jeffrey R. Stevens,et al.  Will Travel for Food: Spatial Discounting in Two New World Monkeys , 2005, Current Biology.

[5]  Asymmetries in the production of self-directed behavior by chimpanzees and gorillas during a computerized cognitive test , 2016, Animal Cognition.

[6]  Peter G Judge,et al.  Ordinal representation of numeric quantities by brown capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella). , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Animal behavior processes.

[7]  Lydia M. Hopper,et al.  Testing differential use of payoff-biased social learning strategies in children and chimpanzees , 2017, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Dora Biro,et al.  The Arena System: a novel shared touch-panel apparatus for the study of chimpanzee social interaction and cognition , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[9]  Lydia M. Hopper,et al.  Chimpanzees’ socially maintained food preferences indicate both conservatism and conformity , 2011, Animal Behaviour.

[10]  Kate L. Howard,et al.  Why rate when you could compare? Using the “EloChoice” package to assess pairwise comparisons of perceived physical strength , 2018, PloS one.

[11]  Stuart G. Baker,et al.  Multinomial–Poisson Transformation , 2006 .

[12]  Scaling reward value with demand curves versus preference tests , 2016, Animal Cognition.

[13]  Brian Hare,et al.  Great apes prefer cooked food. , 2008, Journal of human evolution.

[14]  Lydia M. Hopper,et al.  Selective and contagious prosocial resource donation in capuchin monkeys, chimpanzees and humans , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[15]  Thad Starner,et al.  Canine computer interaction: towards designing a touchscreen interface for working dogs , 2016, ACI.

[16]  Laurie R Santos,et al.  Expectations about numerical events in four lemur species (Eulemur fulvus, Eulemur mongoz, Lemur catta and Varecia rubra) , 2005, Animal Cognition.

[17]  Masayuki Tanaka Development of the visual preference of chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) for photographs of primates: effect of social experience , 2007, Primates.

[18]  J. Call,et al.  Differences in between-reinforcer value modulate the selective-value effect in great apes (Pan troglodytes, P. Paniscus, Gorilla gorilla, Pongo abelii). , 2016, Journal of comparative psychology.

[19]  D. Fragaszy,et al.  How young children and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) perceive objects in a 2D display: putting an assumption to the test. , 2008, Developmental science.

[20]  J. Kemnitz,et al.  Characteristics of spontaneous obesity in male rhesus monkeys , 1986, Physiology & Behavior.

[21]  Bonnie M. Perdue,et al.  The Effect of Computerized Testing on Sun Bear Behavior and Enrichment Preferences , 2016, Behavioral sciences.

[22]  Marie Laure Delignette-Muller,et al.  A Toolbox for Nonlinear Regression in R: The Package nlstools , 2015 .

[23]  Wendi Fellner,et al.  Understanding of the concept of numerically "less" by bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus). , 2005, Journal of comparative psychology.

[24]  Food Preference, Keeper Ratings, and Reinforcer Effectiveness in Exotic Animals: The Value of Systematic Testing , 2011, Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS.

[25]  Lydia M. Hopper,et al.  Social comparison mediates chimpanzees’ responses to loss, not frustration , 2014, Animal Cognition.

[26]  Steven R Hursh,et al.  Economic demand and essential value. , 2008, Psychological review.

[27]  Lydia M. Hopper,et al.  Captive chimpanzee foraging in a social setting: a test of problem solving, flexibility, and spatial discounting , 2015, PeerJ.

[28]  T. Zentall,et al.  Observing Behavior in Pigeons: The Effect of Reinforcement Probability and Response Cost Using a Symmetrical Choice Procedure , 1999 .

[29]  R. Gerlai,et al.  Can angelfish (Pterophyllum scalare) count? Discrimination between different shoal sizes follows Weber’s law , 2010, Animal Cognition.

[30]  T. Matsuzawa,et al.  Development of schematic face preference in macaque monkeys , 2004, Behavioural Processes.

[31]  Defining reward value by cross-modal scaling , 2014, Animal Cognition.

[32]  Bonnie M. Perdue,et al.  Do monkeys choose to choose? , 2014, Learning & behavior.

[33]  Gary Aston-Jones,et al.  The behavioral economics of drug self-administration: A review and new analytical approach for within-session procedures , 2013, Psychopharmacology.

[34]  C. M. Rogers,et al.  Cross-modal perception in apes: Altered visual cues and delay , 1975, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  L. Miller,et al.  Utilizing Scents as Environmental Enrichment: Preference Assessment and Application with Rothschild Giraffe , 2015 .

[36]  Han L. J. van der Maas,et al.  Fitting diffusion item response theory models for responses and response times using the R package diffIRT , 2015 .

[37]  M. Beran,et al.  Bears ‘count’ too: quantity estimation and comparison in black bears, Ursus americanus , 2012, Animal Behaviour.

[38]  Marc Hauser,et al.  Are consonant intervals music to their ears? Spontaneous acoustic preferences in a nonhuman primate , 2004, Cognition.

[39]  S. Brosnan,et al.  Monkeys reject unequal pay , 2003, Nature.

[40]  E. Murray,et al.  Control of Response Selection by Reinforcer Value Requires Interaction of Amygdala and Orbital Prefrontal Cortex , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  J. Call,et al.  Behavioural responses to photographs by pictorially naïve baboons (Papio anubis), gorillas (Gorilla gorilla) and chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) , 2008, Behavioural Processes.

[42]  S. Schapiro,et al.  Control, Choice, and Assessments of the Value of Behavioral Management to Nonhuman Primates in Captivity , 2007, Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS.

[43]  Masayuki Tanaka Visual preference by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) for photos of primates measured by a free choice-order task: implication for influence of social experience , 2003, Primates.

[44]  Did You Ever Hear the One About the Horse that Could Count? , 2012, Front. Psychology.

[45]  Gerhard Tintner,et al.  Mathematical Analysis for Economists. , 1938 .

[46]  S R Hursh,et al.  Normalized demand for drugs and other reinforcers. , 1995, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[47]  F. Svartdal,et al.  Effects of Reinforcer Value on Sensitivity to Non-Verbal Operant Contingencies in Humans , 1993 .

[48]  S. Baker The Multinomial‐Poisson Transformation , 1994 .

[49]  The interplay between individual, social, and environmental influences on chimpanzee food choices , 2014, Behavioural Processes.

[50]  E. Miller,et al.  Neuronal activity in primate dorsolateral and orbital prefrontal cortex during performance of a reward preference task , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[51]  Michael J Beran,et al.  Chimpanzees use self-distraction to cope with impulsivity , 2007, Biology Letters.

[52]  B. Iwata,et al.  Assessment of stimulus preference and reinforcer value with profoundly retarded individuals. , 1985, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[53]  L. Kurdziel,et al.  Picture recognition of food by macaques (Macaca silenus) , 2011, Animal Cognition.

[54]  Tomas Persson,et al.  Pictorial Primates: A Search for Iconic Abilities in Great Apes , 2008 .

[55]  Elizabeth M Brannon,et al.  Basic Math in Monkeys and College Students , 2007, PLoS biology.

[56]  T. Matsuzawa,et al.  Working memory of numerals in chimpanzees , 2007, Current Biology.

[57]  Regina Dittrich,et al.  prefmod: An R Package for Modeling Preferences Based on Paired Comparisons, Rankings, or Ratings , 2012 .

[58]  A Two-Choice Preference Assessment With Five Cotton-Top Tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) , 2004, Journal of applied animal welfare science : JAAWS.

[59]  J. Call,et al.  How chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) perform in a modified emotional Stroop task , 2015, Animal Cognition.

[60]  R. Rosenthal,et al.  Clever Hans : the horse of Mr. Von Osten , 1911 .

[61]  T. Zentall,et al.  Pigeons, unlike humans, do not prefer near hits in a slot-machine-like task , 2017, Behavioural Processes.

[62]  M. Egli,et al.  Food choice in people with Prader-Willi syndrome: quantity and relative preference. , 2002, American journal of mental retardation : AJMR.

[63]  S. MacDonald,et al.  Spontaneous Preference for Primate Photographs in Sumatran Orangutans (Pongo abelii) , 2020, International Journal of Comparative Psychology.

[64]  Victoria L. Templer,et al.  An assessment of domain-general metacognitive responding in rhesus monkeys , 2017, Behavioural Processes.

[65]  Sarah T. Boysen,et al.  Quantity-based interference and symbolic representations in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). , 1996 .

[66]  Lydia M. Hopper,et al.  Social Models Enhance Apes’ Memory for Novel Events , 2017, Scientific Reports.