Relationships Between MRI Breast Imaging‐Reporting and Data System (BI‐RADS) Lexicon Descriptors and Breast Cancer Molecular Subtypes: Internal Enhancement is Associated with Luminal B Subtype

The aim of this study was to determine the associations between breast MRI findings using the Breast Imaging‐Reporting and Data System (BI‐RADS) lexicon descriptors and breast cancer molecular subtypes. In this retrospective, IRB‐approved, single institution study MRIs from 278 women with breast cancer were reviewed by one of six fellowship‐trained breast imagers. Readers reported BI‐RADS descriptors for breast masses (shape, margin, internal enhancement) and non‐mass enhancement (distribution, internal enhancement). Pathology reports were reviewed for estrogen receptor (ER), progesterone receptor (PR), and human epidermal growth factor receptor‐2 (HER2). Surrogates were used to categorize tumors by molecular subtype: ER/PR+, HER2‐ (luminal A); ER/PR+, HER2+ (luminal B); ER/PR‐, HER2+ (HER2); ER/PR/HER2‐ (basal). A univariate logistic regression model was developed to identify associations between BI‐RADS descriptors and molecular subtypes. Internal enhancement for mass and non‐mass enhancement was combined for analysis. There was an association between mass shape and basal subtype (p = 0.039), which was more frequently round (17.1%) than other subtypes (range: 0–8.3%). In addition, there was an association between mass margin and HER2 subtype (p = 0.040), as HER2 cancers more frequently had a smooth margin (33.3%) than other subtypes (range: 4.2–17.1%). Finally, there was an association between internal enhancement and luminal B subtype (p = 0.003), with no cases of luminal B cancer demonstrating homogeneous internal enhancement versus a range of 10.9–23.5% for other subtypes. There are associations between breast cancer molecular subtypes and lesion appearance on MRI using the BI‐RADS lexicon.

[1]  Maciej A Mazurowski,et al.  Radiogenomic analysis of breast cancer: luminal B molecular subtype is associated with enhancement dynamics at MR imaging. , 2014, Radiology.

[2]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  BREAST IMAGING : Positive Predictive Value of BI-RADS MR Imaging , 2012 .

[3]  W. Kaiser,et al.  Association between survival in patients with primary invasive breast cancer and computer aided MRI , 2013, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[4]  D. Roukos,et al.  Multigene assays and isolated tumor cells for early breast cancer treatment: time for bionetworks , 2010, Expert review of anticancer therapy.

[5]  L. Carey,et al.  Breast cancer molecular subtypes in patients with locally advanced disease: impact on prognosis, patterns of recurrence, and response to therapy. , 2009, Seminars in radiation oncology.

[6]  Wendy B DeMartini,et al.  BI-RADS lesion characteristics predict likelihood of malignancy in breast MRI for masses but not for nonmasslike enhancement. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[7]  K. Zalata,et al.  Molecular subtypes of breast carcinoma in Egyptian women: clinicopathological features. , 2012, Pathology, research and practice.

[8]  Radhakrishna Selvi,et al.  BI-RADS for Mammography , 2015 .

[9]  Maciej A Mazurowski,et al.  Recurrence-free survival in breast cancer is associated with MRI tumor enhancement dynamics quantified using computer algorithms. , 2015, European journal of radiology.

[10]  P. Dell’Era,et al.  Fibroblast growth factor/fibroblast growth factor receptor system in angiogenesis. , 2005, Cytokine & growth factor reviews.

[11]  Christian A. Rees,et al.  Molecular portraits of human breast tumours , 2000, Nature.

[12]  E Boven,et al.  Breast cancer classification by proteomic technologies: current state of knowledge. , 2014, Cancer treatment reviews.

[13]  C. Perou,et al.  Personalizing the treatment of women with early breast cancer: highlights of the St Gallen International Expert Consensus on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2013 , 2013, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.