Nonlinear multiplicative dendritic integration in neuron and network models

Neurons receive inputs from thousands of synapses distributed across dendritic trees of complex morphology. It is known that dendritic integration of excitatory and inhibitory synapses can be highly non-linear in reality and can heavily depend on the exact location and spatial arrangement of inhibitory and excitatory synapses on the dendrite. Despite this known fact, most neuron models used in artificial neural networks today still only describe the voltage potential of a single somatic compartment and assume a simple linear summation of all individual synaptic inputs. We here suggest a new biophysical motivated derivation of a single compartment model that integrates the non-linear effects of shunting inhibition, where an inhibitory input on the route of an excitatory input to the soma cancels or “shunts” the excitatory potential. In particular, our integration of non-linear dendritic processing into the neuron model follows a simple multiplicative rule, suggested recently by experiments, and allows for strict mathematical treatment of network effects. Using our new formulation, we further devised a spiking network model where inhibitory neurons act as global shunting gates, and show that the network exhibits persistent activity in a low firing regime.

[1]  S. Blomfield Arithmetical operations performed by nerve cells. , 1974, Brain research.

[2]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  [Letters to nature] , 1996, Nature.

[3]  Xiao-Jing Wang Synaptic reverberation underlying mnemonic persistent activity , 2001, Trends in Neurosciences.

[4]  J J Hopfield,et al.  Neurons with graded response have collective computational properties like those of two-state neurons. , 1984, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  T. Poggio,et al.  Nonlinear interactions in a dendritic tree: localization, timing, and role in information processing. , 1983, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[6]  Eugene M. Izhikevich,et al.  Dynamical Systems in Neuroscience: The Geometry of Excitability and Bursting , 2006 .

[7]  M. London,et al.  Dendritic computation. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[8]  W. Crill,et al.  Specific membrane properties of cat motoneurones , 1974, The Journal of physiology.

[9]  L. Jan,et al.  The distribution and targeting of neuronal voltage-gated ion channels , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[10]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Erratum to: Effects of neuromodulation in a cortical network model of object working memory dominated by recurrent inhibition , 2014, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[11]  Nikos K Logothetis,et al.  Statistical comparison of spike responses to natural stimuli in monkey area V1 with simulated responses of a detailed laminar network model for a patch of V1. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[12]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  Graded persistent activity in entorhinal cortex neurons , 2002, Nature.

[13]  J. Gold,et al.  Neural computations that underlie decisions about sensory stimuli , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[14]  David Cai,et al.  Phenomenological Incorporation of Nonlinear Dendritic Integration Using Integrate-and-Fire Neuronal Frameworks , 2013, PloS one.

[15]  Masato Okada,et al.  Steep decrease in the specific membrane resistance in the apical dendrites of hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neurons , 2009, Neuroscience Research.

[16]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Robust Spatial Working Memory through Homeostatic Synaptic Scaling in Heterogeneous Cortical Networks , 2003, Neuron.

[17]  Ranulfo Romo,et al.  Flexible Control of Mutual Inhibition: A Neural Model of Two-Interval Discrimination , 2005, Science.

[18]  L.F. Abbott,et al.  Gating Multiple Signals through Detailed Balance of Excitation and Inhibition in Spiking Networks , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[19]  T. Poggio,et al.  Retinal ganglion cells: a functional interpretation of dendritic morphology. , 1982, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[20]  J. Cowan,et al.  Excitatory and inhibitory interactions in localized populations of model neurons. , 1972, Biophysical journal.

[21]  F. AbbottPhysics Realistic Synaptic Inputs for Model Neural Networks , 1991 .

[22]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  A Recurrent Network Mechanism of Time Integration in Perceptual Decisions , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  H. Markram,et al.  Interneurons of the neocortical inhibitory system , 2004, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[24]  Tim Gollisch,et al.  Modeling Single-Neuron Dynamics and Computations: A Balance of Detail and Abstraction , 2006, Science.

[25]  Wulfram Gerstner,et al.  SPIKING NEURON MODELS Single Neurons , Populations , Plasticity , 2002 .

[26]  R. Shapley,et al.  A neuronal network model of macaque primary visual cortex (V1): orientation selectivity and dynamics in the input layer 4Calpha. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[27]  D. Johnston,et al.  Active dendrites reduce location-dependent variability of synaptic input trains. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[28]  F. Krasne,et al.  Evidence for a computational distinction between proximal and distal neuronal inhibition. , 1992, Science.

[29]  Masato Okada,et al.  Estimated distribution of specific membrane resistance in hippocampal CA1 pyramidal neuron , 2006, Brain Research.

[30]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Dynamics of a recurrent network of spiking neurons before and following learning , 1997 .

[31]  D. Amit,et al.  Model of global spontaneous activity and local structured activity during delay periods in the cerebral cortex. , 1997, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  Vivien A. Casagrande,et al.  Biophysics of Computation: Information Processing in Single Neurons , 1999 .

[33]  Xiao-Jing Wang,et al.  Probabilistic Decision Making by Slow Reverberation in Cortical Circuits , 2002, Neuron.

[34]  Si Wu,et al.  Simple Models for Synaptic Information Integration , 2011, ICONIP.

[35]  Y. Dan,et al.  An arithmetic rule for spatial summation of excitatory and inhibitory inputs in pyramidal neurons , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Nelson Spruston,et al.  Factors mediating powerful voltage attenuation along CA1 pyramidal neuron dendrites , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[37]  Nicolas Brunel,et al.  Dynamics of Sparsely Connected Networks of Excitatory and Inhibitory Spiking Neurons , 2000, Journal of Computational Neuroscience.

[38]  Z. J. Huang,et al.  Development of GABA innervation in the cerebral and cerebellar cortices , 2007, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[39]  W. Rall Core Conductor Theory and Cable Properties of Neurons , 2011 .

[40]  M. Tsodyks,et al.  Synaptic Theory of Working Memory , 2008, Science.

[41]  Y. Frégnac,et al.  Visual input evokes transient and strong shunting inhibition in visual cortical neurons , 1998, Nature.

[42]  Bartlett W. Mel,et al.  Location-Dependent Effects of Inhibition on Local Spiking in Pyramidal Neuron Dendrites , 2012, PLoS Comput. Biol..

[43]  Ranulfo Romo,et al.  Basic mechanisms for graded persistent activity: discrete attractors, continuous attractors, and dynamic representations , 2003, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[44]  F. AbbottPhysics FIRING-RATE MODELS FOR NEURAL POPULATIONSL , 1991 .