A tradeoff between unit capacity and average production cost in spinning reserve optimization

Abstract In power systems the spinning reserve (SR) amount can be determined by deterministic or probabilistic techniques. Probabilistic techniques draw more attention since they can consider the economics and the stochastic nature of system behavior and component failures. In probabilistic techniques, the tradeoff between cost and reliability directly affects the SR deployment and it has been extensively analyzed. However, there is another tradeoff which reflects the compromise between the unit capacity and average production cost in the SR optimization problem. This tradeoff impacts the solution accuracy to a certain extent and influences the complexity of the model, and it has not been explicitly analyzed before. In this paper, a new SR optimization method is proposed in which the tradeoff between unit capacity and average production cost is well respected. The proposed method strikes a good balance between solution accuracy and computation efficiency and can obtain better results within a desirable run time compared with those of the previous methods. Besides, the proposed method can also be used to improve the solution of the reserve constrained unit commitment problem. It can lower the total cost by just redistributing the MW dispatch even when the SSR is fixed. The efficiency and validity of the proposed method are verified using the IEEE reliability test system.

[1]  Danny Pudjianto,et al.  Optimising the scheduling of spinning reserve considering the cost of interruptions , 2006 .

[2]  C. Floudas Nonlinear and Mixed-Integer Optimization: Fundamentals and Applications , 1995 .

[3]  M. Ortega-Vazquez,et al.  Optimizing the Spinning Reserve Requirements Using a Cost/Benefit Analysis , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[4]  D. Kirschen,et al.  Optimal scheduling of spinning reserve , 1999 .

[5]  K. K. Kariuki,et al.  Evaluation of reliability worth and value of lost load , 1996 .

[6]  C.D. Vournas,et al.  Reliability Constrained Unit Commitment Using Simulated Annealing , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[7]  Mohammad Shahidehpour,et al.  The IEEE Reliability Test System-1996. A report prepared by the Reliability Test System Task Force of the Application of Probability Methods Subcommittee , 1999 .

[8]  David Kendrick,et al.  GAMS, a user's guide , 1988, SGNM.

[9]  B. Venkatesh,et al.  Fuzzy MILP Unit Commitment Incorporating Wind Generators , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[10]  S. M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Effects of ramp-rate limits on unit commitment and economic dispatch , 1993 .

[11]  Roy Billinton,et al.  Reliability evaluation of power systems , 1984 .

[12]  J. Zhong,et al.  Generation dispatch considering wind energy and system reliability , 2010, IEEE PES General Meeting.

[13]  F. Bouffard,et al.  An electricity market with a probabilistic spinning reserve criterion , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[14]  Kevin Tomsovic,et al.  Quantifying Spinning Reserve in Systems With Significant Wind Power Penetration , 2012 .

[15]  M. Shahidehpour,et al.  Unit Commitment With Probabilistic Spinning Reserve and Interruptible Load Considerations , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Power Systems.

[16]  Jianxue Wang,et al.  Operating reserve model in the power market , 2005 .

[17]  Hoay Beng Gooi,et al.  Optimising probabilistic spinning reserve using an analytical expected-energy-not-supplied formulation , 2011 .

[18]  Ross Baldick,et al.  Unit commitment with probabilistic reserve , 2002, 2002 IEEE Power Engineering Society Winter Meeting. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.02CH37309).