Nontriggered magnetic resonance velocity measurement of the time‐average of pulsatile velocity

The feasibility of the determination of the time‐average of pulsatile velocity obtained via a nontriggered magnetic resonance (MR) acquisition is studied. The advantage of this method, in comparison with a triggered acquisition, is a considerable reduction (≈15×) in acquisition time. However, pul‐satility causes image artifacts, known as ghosts, and the Fourier transform technique required for the imaging procedure accomplishes time‐averaging of the complex MR signal. Both effects can result in errors in the velocity determined. Calculations show that these errors depend on the velocity time function and the acquisition parameters. In vivo comparison of triggered and nontriggered MR velocity measurements in the femoral artery of volunteers (n = 7) shows larger statistical and systematic errors in the latter, which depend on the excitation angle. Therefore, this nontriggered average velocity measurement is only useful as a fast and rough estimation of the time‐averaged velocity.

[1]  D N Firmin,et al.  Valve and great vessel stenosis: assessment with MR jet velocity mapping. , 1991, Radiology.

[2]  C L Dumoulin,et al.  Three‐dimensional phase contrast angiography , 1989, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[3]  R. B. Franklin,et al.  Quantitative Cardiovascular Studies , 1980 .

[4]  L Axel,et al.  Blood flow effects in magnetic resonance imaging. , 1984, Magnetic resonance annual.

[5]  M. L. Wood,et al.  MR image artifacts from periodic motion. , 1985, Medical physics.

[6]  D G Nishimura,et al.  On the nature and reduction of the displacement artifact in flow images , 1991, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[7]  The measurement of time-averaged flow by magnetic resonance imaging using continuous acquisition in the carotid arteries and its comparison with Doppler ultrasound. , 1990, Clinical physics and physiological measurement : an official journal of the Hospital Physicists' Association, Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Medizinische Physik and the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics.

[8]  D N Firmin,et al.  Magnetic resonance velocity mapping: clinical application of a new technique. , 1987, British heart journal.

[9]  D N Firmin,et al.  Blood flow imaging by cine magnetic resonance. , 1986, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[10]  T. Musha,et al.  1/f Fluctuation of Heartbeat Period , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  J C Gore,et al.  A numerical investigation of the dependence of NMR signal from pulsatile blood flow in CINE pulse sequences. , 1991, Medical physics.

[12]  E M Haacke,et al.  Reducing motion artifacts in two-dimensional Fourier transform imaging. , 1986, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[13]  T. Foster,et al.  A review of normal tissue hydrogen NMR relaxation times and relaxation mechanisms from 1-100 MHz: dependence on tissue type, NMR frequency, temperature, species, excision, and age. , 1984, Medical physics.

[14]  A. Shimakawa,et al.  Time-of-flight MR flow imaging: selective saturation recovery with gradient refocusing. , 1986, Radiology.

[15]  J Valk,et al.  An in vivo validation of quantitative blood flow imaging in arteries and veins using magnetic resonance phase-shift techniques. , 1991, European heart journal.

[16]  N. Neu,et al.  Cardiac myosin-induced myocarditis as a model of postinfectious autoimmunity. , 1991, European heart journal.