Life cycle assessment of flexibly fed biogas processes for an improved demand-oriented biogas supply.

This paper analyses concepts to facilitate a demand oriented biogas supply at an agricultural biogas plant of a capacity of 500kWhel, operated with the co-digestion of maize, grass, rye silage and chicken manure. In contrast to previous studies, environmental impacts of flexible and the traditional baseload operation are compared. Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) was performed to detect the environmental impacts of: (i) variety of feedstock co-digestion scenarios by substitution of maize and (ii) loading rate scenarios with a focus on flexible feedstock utilization. Demand-driven biogas production is critical for an overall balanced power supply to the electrical grid. It results in lower amounts of emissions; feedstock loading rate scenarios resulted in 48%, 20%, 11% lower global warming (GWP), acidification (AP) and eutrophication potentials, and a 16% higher cumulative energy demand. Substitution of maize with biogenic-waste regarding to feedstock substitution scenarios could create 10% lower GWP and AP.

[1]  Adisa Azapagic,et al.  Life cycle environmental impacts of generating electricity and heat from biogas produced by anaerobic digestion , 2014 .

[2]  Maria Berglund,et al.  Biogas production from a systems analytical perspective , 2006 .

[3]  Andreas Gronauer,et al.  Greenhouse gas balance and resource demand of biogas plants in agriculture , 2010 .

[4]  K. S. Creamer,et al.  Inhibition of anaerobic digestion process: a review. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[5]  Sara González-García,et al.  Anaerobic digestion of different feedstocks: impact on energetic and environmental balances of biogas process. , 2013, The Science of the total environment.

[6]  U. Keymer,et al.  Leitfaden Biogas. Von der Gewinnung zur Nutzung , 2010 .

[7]  Michael Wachendorf,et al.  Review of concepts for a demand-driven biogas supply for flexible power generation , 2014 .

[8]  B. J. Chambers,et al.  Ammonia Emissions from Broiler Litter and Laying Hen Manure Management Systems , 2004 .

[9]  L. Hamelin,et al.  Comparing environmental consequences of anaerobic mono- and co-digestion of pig manure to produce bio-energy--a life cycle perspective. , 2012, Bioresource technology.

[10]  Michele Moretto,et al.  Investing in Biogas: Timing, Technological Choice and the Value of Flexibility from Inputs Mix , 2009, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[11]  Carsten Jost,et al.  Performance of a novel two-phase continuously fed leach bed reactor for demand-based biogas production from maize silage. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[12]  Jean-Marc Jossart,et al.  Energy and CO2 balance of maize and grass as energy crops for anaerobic digestion. , 2008, Bioresource technology.

[13]  Michael Nelles,et al.  Flexible biogas production for demand-driven energy supply--feeding strategies and types of substrates. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[14]  Michael Wachendorf,et al.  Comparative life cycle assessment of biogas plant configurations for a demand oriented biogas supply for flexible power generation. , 2015, Bioresource technology.

[15]  Frank Brentrup,et al.  Methods to estimate on-field nitrogen emissions from crop production as an input to LCA studies in the agricultural sector , 2000 .

[16]  Jens Lansche,et al.  Life cycle assessment of energy generation of biogas fed combined heat and power plants: Environmental impact of different agricultural substrates , 2012 .

[17]  R. Lal,et al.  Carbon emission from farm operations. , 2004, Environment international.

[18]  Hans-Jürgen Dr. Klüppel,et al.  The Revision of ISO Standards 14040-3 - ISO 14040: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Principles and framework - ISO 14044: Environmental management – Life cycle assessment – Requirements and guidelines , 2005 .

[19]  M. Nelles,et al.  Life cycle assessment of the supply and use of bioenergy: impact of regional factors on biogas production , 2012, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment.

[20]  Máté Fuchsz,et al.  Comparison of the environmental effects of manure- and crop-based agricultural biogas plants using life cycle analysis , 2015 .

[21]  Jan Liebetrau,et al.  Flexible Power Generation from Biogas , 2015 .

[22]  S. Ward,et al.  Prospects for expanded utilization of biogas in Germany , 2010 .

[23]  Tim Patterson,et al.  Life cycle assessment of biogas infrastructure options on a regional scale. , 2011, Bioresource technology.

[24]  E. Houshyar.  Energy Consumption of Canola and Sunflower Production in Iran , 2009 .

[25]  Per-Anders Hansson,et al.  Demand-Orientated Power Production from Biogas: Modeling and Simulations under Swedish Conditions , 2015 .