Psychophysical and saccadic information about direction for briefly presented visual targets

For saccades, the difference between desired and actual eye movement (constant error), as well as the variability in amplitude on repeated trials (variable error), presumably represent a combination of errors in processing target position (sensory error) and errors in execution (motor error). To examine whether the saccadic system uses the same information about target position as visual perception, subjects made saccades to and psychophysical judgments about the location of targets presented for 17-200 msec. Mean saccadic amplitude markedly decreased and inter-trial variability increased when saccadic targets were presented briefly and followed by a spatial mask. Judged target position (from psychophysical vernier and bisection tasks) also shifted to lesser eccentricities and was more variable. Although qualitatively alike, changes with duration in saccadic constant errors were larger than could be accounted for by the psychophysical results, suggesting similar but separate processing of position information for the saccadic and perceptual systems. Differences in the sizes of collicular receptive fields that preferentially respond to targets at short and long durations can account qualitatively for the observed changes in saccadic amplitude as well as the common occurrence of saccadic undershoots.

[1]  G. R. Engel.  An Investigation of Visual Responses to Brief Stereoscopic Stimuli , 1970, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  A. Z. Meiri,et al.  The effects of exposure duration and luminance on the 3-dot hyperacuity task , 1984, Vision Research.

[3]  H. W. Leibowitz,et al.  Radial Localization of a Single Stimulus as a Function of Luminance and Duration of Exposure , 1955 .

[4]  J. F. van Sonderen,et al.  THE SYSTEMATIC UNDERSHOOT OF SACCADES: A LOCALIZATION OR AN OCULOMOTOR PHENOMENON? , 1987 .

[5]  J T McIlwain,et al.  Visual receptive fields and their images in superior colliculus of the cat. , 1975, Journal of neurophysiology.

[6]  P. E. Hallett,et al.  Rod-cone dependence of saccadic eye-movement latency in a foveating task , 1988, Vision Research.

[7]  George Sperling,et al.  The information available in brief visual presentations. , 1960 .

[8]  H. Collewijn,et al.  Differences in accuracy of human saccades between stationary and jumping targets , 1989, Vision Research.

[9]  Z. Kapoula,et al.  Evidence for a range effect in the saccadic system , 1985, Vision Research.

[10]  Harold E. Bedell,et al.  Changes in oculocentric visual direction induced by the recalibration of saccades , 1988, Vision Research.

[11]  S. Klein,et al.  Detection and discrimination of the direction of motion in central and peripheral vision of normal and amblyopic observers , 1984, Vision Research.

[12]  R. Watt.  Scanning from coarse to fine spatial scales in the human visual system after the onset of a stimulus. , 1987, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[13]  H. Bedell,et al.  Precision and accuracy of oculocentric direction for targets of different luminances , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[14]  Christian Coëffé,et al.  Reducing the influence of non-target stimuli on saccade accuracy: Predictability and latency effects , 1987, Vision Research.

[15]  Christian Coëffé.  TWO WAYS OF IMPROVING SACCADE ACCURACY , 1987 .

[16]  S. Coren,et al.  Effect of Non-Target Stimuli upon Length of Voluntary Saccades , 1972, Perceptual and motor skills.

[17]  P. Lennie,et al.  The influence of temporal frequency and adaptation level on receptive field organization of retinal ganglion cells in cat , 1982, The Journal of physiology.

[18]  S Mateeff,et al.  Brief stimuli localization in visual periphery. , 1984, Acta physiologica et pharmacologica Bulgarica.

[19]  D. Henson.  Corrective saccades: Effects of altering visual feedback , 1978, Vision Research.

[20]  W. Wolf,et al.  The Evaluation of the Oculomotor Error Signal , 1984 .

[21]  W. Becker.  The control of eye movements in the saccadic system. , 1972, Bibliotheca ophthalmologica : supplementa ad ophthalmologica.

[22]  J. Findlay.  Global visual processing for saccadic eye movements , 1982, Vision Research.

[23]  R F Erlandson,et al.  Uncertainty sets associated with saccadic eye movements-basis of satisfaction control. , 1974, Vision research.

[24]  M. Cynader,et al.  Receptive-field organization of monkey superior colliculus. , 1972, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  P Lennie,et al.  The control of retinal ganglion cell discharge by receptive field surrounds. , 1975, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  C. Enroth-Cugell,et al.  Chapter 9 Visual adaptation and retinal gain controls , 1984 .

[27]  Bruno G. Breitmeyer,et al.  Visual masking : an integrative approach , 1984 .

[28]  F. Ottes,et al.  Metrics of saccade responses to visual double stimuli: Two different modes , 1984, Vision Research.

[29]  Dennis M. Levi,et al.  Peripheral positional acuity: Retinal and cortical constraints on 2-dot separation discrimination under photopic and scotopic conditions , 1989, Vision Research.

[30]  A. Levy-Schoen,et al.  On oculomotor programming and perception. , 1974, Brain research.

[31]  C. A. Burbeck,et al.  Exposure-duration effects in localization judgments. , 1986, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics and image science.

[32]  Albert E. Bartz,et al.  Fixation errors in eye movements to peripheral stimuli. , 1967 .

[33]  Adriana Fiorentini,et al.  Differences between fovea and parafovea in visual search processes , 1989, Vision Research.

[34]  W. Becker,et al.  An analysis of the saccadic system by means of double step stimuli , 1979, Vision Research.

[35]  Barnes Gr,et al.  Characteristics of eye movements to targets of short duration. , 1973 .

[36]  D. Sparks,et al.  Spatial localization of saccade targets. I. Compensation for stimulation-induced perturbations in eye position. , 1983, Journal of neurophysiology.