Knowledge visualization: Critique of the St. Gallen School and an analysis of contemporary trends

Tatiana A. Gavrilova - Professor, Head of Department of Information Technologies in Management, Saint-Petersburg UniversityAddress: 3, Volkhovsky Pereulok, St. Petersburg, 199004, Russian FederationE-mail: gavrilova@gsom.pu.ruArtem I. Alsufyev - Assistant Professor, Department of Organizational Behavior and Personnel Management, Saint-Petersburg UniversityAddress: 3, Volkhovsky Pereulok, St. Petersburg, 199004, Russian FederationE-mail: alsufyev@gsom.pu.ruElvira Y. Grinberg - Doctoral Student, Department of Information Technologies in Management, Saint-Petersburg UniversityAddress: 3, Volkhovsky Pereulok, St. Petersburg, 199004, Russian FederationE-mail: st057454@student.spbu.ru The purpose of this article is the analysis of leading European research in the field of knowledge visualization from the point of view of the accumulated theoretical base, practice of application, problems, and trends. The need for digital business transformation for survival in the era of high-speed, mobile intelligent applications and big data has become apparent. However, understanding and interpretation of information can be performed only by humans. Modern managers cope with information “explosion” through visualization. Visualization helps them to understand, to compress and to demonstrate the ocean of numbers, words, and ideas. The number of works devoted to the theme of visualization is growing every year. There are numerous studies on the visualization of networks and relationships, and visualization of communication with a consumer. Fewer articles have been devoted to the visualization of knowledge in the implementation of business practices. At the same time, scientists are examining one specific area of application of visualization and only a few contribute to the theory of the subject and study it in a versatile manner. The latter include the works of researchers from the University of St. Gallen (Switzerland), which we call in this article the St. Gallen School. We propose systematization of the following basic stages of research formation of the aforementioned School: 1) the preliminary stage, 2) the stage of empirical data accumulation, and 3) the stage of theory development. The School’s contribution to the theory and practice of management was analyzed. Its contribution to theory includes the classification of visualization techniques, a description of visualization use in business, the development of the boundary objects theory, as well as a detailed description of experimental studies. Contribution to business practices means implementation of educational projects and the development of new visual models. The fragmented nature of research is identified: theoretical work is focused on how several visual models influence the implementation of certain business practices; empirical work often describes consulting projects, but do not provide an understanding of how to apply visualization techniques when there is no researcher-consultant. Based on our analysis of the literature, we demonstrate that the major trend in information processing is focus on knowledge representation based on data, not data as such. The challenging areas related to applied research methods are highlighted as follows: lack of consistency, and lack of distinction between the concepts of “data visualization” and “knowledge visualization”. Thus, there is a need to distinguish visualization of knowledge in a separate area of study.This work was supported by the Russian Science Foundation (grant No. 15-18-30048)

[1]  LeMai Nguyen,et al.  Creative problem solving in digital space using visual analytics , 2015, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[2]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  The Benefits of Synchronous Collaborative Information Visualization: Evidence from an Experimental Evaluation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics.

[3]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Understanding the impact of visual representation restrictiveness on experience sharing: An experimental assessment , 2015, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[4]  Tatiana Gavrilova,et al.  Modern Notation of Business Models: A Visual Trend , 2014 .

[5]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Visual Strategizing: The Systematic Use of Visualization in the Strategic-Planning Process , 2009 .

[6]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Does method matter? An experiment on collaborative business model idea generation in teams , 2012 .

[7]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Slip-Sliding-Away , 2015 .

[8]  Thomas R. Gruber,et al.  A Translation Approach to Portable Ontologies , 1993 .

[9]  Igor Fiodorov Overcoming expressiveness deficit of business process modeling languages , 2016 .

[10]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Challenges and Visual Solutions for Strategic Business Model Innovation , 2011 .

[11]  Rajesh Bagchi,et al.  The Effect of Goal Visualization on Goal Pursuit: Implications for Consumers and Managers: , 2011 .

[12]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Visualization Summit 2007: Ten Research Goals for 2010 , 2007, Inf. Vis..

[13]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Augmenting Communication with Visualization: Effects on Emotional and Cognitive Response , 2011 .

[14]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  We walk the line: Icons provisional appearances on virtual whiteboards trigger elaborative dialogue and creativity , 2016, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[15]  Martin J. Eppler A Comparison between Concept Maps, Mind Maps, Conceptual Diagrams, and Visual Metaphors as Complementary Tools for Knowledge Construction and Sharing , 2006, Inf. Vis..

[16]  Martin J. Eppler Toward a visual turn in collaboration analysis? , 2007 .

[17]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Drawing Conclusions: Supporting Decision Making through Collaborative Graphic Annotations , 2010, 2010 14th International Conference Information Visualisation.

[18]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Beyond projection: using collaborative visualization to conduct qualitative interviews , 2014 .

[19]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Caring for Clarity in Knowledge Communication , 2011, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[20]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  The Benefits of Sketching for Knowledge Management , 2012, J. Knowl. Manag..

[21]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  A systematic framework for risk visualization in risk management and communication , 2009 .

[22]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  NEW BUSINESS MODELS THROUGH COLLABORATIVE IDEA GENERATION , 2011 .

[23]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Visualization in management: From communication to collaboration. A response to Zhang , 2013, J. Vis. Lang. Comput..

[24]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Towards a periodic table of visualization methods , 2007 .

[25]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Visual Facilitation on Inter-Organizational Collaboration: An Experimental Study , 2011, J. Univers. Comput. Sci..

[26]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Best of Both Worlds: Hybrid Knowledge Visualization in Police Crime Fighting and Military Operations , 2013, i-Know '13.

[27]  Tatiana Gavrilova,et al.  On a method of visual models classification , 2013 .

[28]  Min Zhao,et al.  The Role of Imagination-Focused Visualization on New Product Evaluation , 2009 .

[29]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Visual representations in knowledge management: framework and cases , 2007, J. Knowl. Manag..

[30]  Kathryn Henderson,et al.  Flexible Sketches and Inflexible Data Bases: Visual Communication, Conscription Devices, and Boundary Objects in Design Engineering , 1991 .

[31]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Knowledge scaffolding visualizations: A guiding framework , 2015 .

[32]  Susan Leigh Star,et al.  Institutional Ecology, `Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39 , 1989 .

[33]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  The Pitfalls of Visual Representations , 2015 .

[34]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  Diagnosing capabilities in family firms: An overview of visual research methods and suggestions for future applications , 2014 .

[35]  Martin J. Eppler,et al.  An Experimental Evaluation on the Impact of Visual Facilitation Modes on Idea Generation in Teams , 2013, 2013 17th International Conference on Information Visualisation.

[36]  Remo A. Burkhard,et al.  Towards a New Discipline and its Fields of Application , 2004 .