Evaluation of Automatic Segmentation of Thalamic Nuclei through Clinical Effects Using Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Leads: A Technical Note

Automatic anatomical segmentation of patients’ anatomical structures and modeling of the volume of tissue activated (VTA) can potentially facilitate trajectory planning and post-operative programming in deep brain stimulation (DBS). We demonstrate an approach to evaluate the accuracy of such software for the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) using directional leads. In an essential tremor patient with asymmetrical brain anatomy, lead placement was adjusted according to the suggested segmentation made by the software (Brainlab). Postoperatively, we used directionality to assess lead placement using side effect testing (internal capsule and sensory thalamus). Clinical effects were then compared to the patient-specific visualization and VTA simulation in the GUIDE™ XT software (Boston Scientific). The patient’s asymmetrical anatomy was correctly recognized by the software and matched the clinical results. VTA models matched best for dysarthria (6 out of 6 cases) and sensory hand side effects (5/6), but least for facial side effects (1/6). Best concordance was observed for the modeled current anterior and back spread of the VTA, worst for the current side spread. Automatic anatomical segmentation and VTA models can be valuable tools for DBS planning and programming. Directional DBS leads allow detailed postoperative assessment of the concordance of such image-based simulation and visualization with clinical effects.

[1]  Siobhan Ewert,et al.  Lead-DBS v2: Towards a comprehensive pipeline for deep brain stimulation imaging , 2018, NeuroImage.

[2]  Andrea A Kühn,et al.  Lead-DBS: A toolbox for deep brain stimulation electrode localizations and visualizations , 2015, NeuroImage.

[3]  M. Hariz,et al.  Connectivity derived thalamic segmentation: Separating myth from reality , 2019, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[4]  H. Abe,et al.  A retrospective evaluation of thalamic targeting for tremor deep brain stimulation using high-resolution anatomical imaging with supplementary fiber tractography , 2019, Journal of the Neurological Sciences.

[5]  Jurgen Germann,et al.  Neuroimaging Technological Advancements for Targeting in Functional Neurosurgery , 2019, Current Neurology and Neuroscience Reports.

[6]  R. Elble,et al.  Assessment of interrater and intrarater reliability of the Fahn–Tolosa–Marin Tremor Rating Scale in essential tremor , 2007, Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society.

[7]  Caroline Essert,et al.  PyDBS: an automated image processing workflow for deep brain stimulation surgery , 2015, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[8]  G. Schneider,et al.  Toward an electrophysiological “sweet spot” for deep brain stimulation in the subthalamic nucleus , 2017, Human brain mapping.

[9]  C. McIntyre,et al.  Reversing cognitive-motor impairments in Parkinson's disease patients using a computational modelling approach to deep brain stimulation programming. , 2010, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[11]  V. Coenen,et al.  Determining the Orientation of Directional Deep Brain Stimulation Electrodes Using 3D Rotational Fluoroscopy , 2017, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[12]  Ningfei Li,et al.  Deep brain stimulation: Imaging on a group level , 2020, NeuroImage.

[13]  J. Volkmann,et al.  Rescuing Suboptimal Outcomes of Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson Disease by Surgical Lead Revision. , 2019, Neurosurgery.

[14]  J. Ashburner,et al.  Connectivity derived thalamic segmentation in deep brain stimulation for tremor , 2018, NeuroImage: Clinical.

[15]  Lungren,et al.  Stereotactic and Functional Neurosurgery: Principles and Applications , 2020 .

[16]  V. Coenen,et al.  Automatic Segmentation of the Subthalamic Nucleus: A Viable Option to Support Planning and Visualization of Patient-Specific Targeting in Deep Brain Stimulation. , 2019, Operative neurosurgery.