Consensus on Social Influence Network Model

Many studies show that opinions formation displays multiple patterns, from consensus to polarization. Under the framework of the social influence network by Friedkin and Johnsen (1999) and based on random walk on graph, we rigorously prove that for a social group influence system, with static social influence structure, the group consensus is almost a quite certain result. In addition, we prove the lower bounds on the convergence time m for random walk \(P^{m}\) to be close to its final average consensus (wisdom group decision making) state, given an arbitrary initial opinions profile vector and one small positive error \(\epsilon \). Although our explanations are purely based on mathematic deduction, it shows that the latent social influence structure is the key factor for the persistence of disagreement and formation of opinions convergence or consensus in the real world social group.

[1]  L. A. Goodman,et al.  Social Choice and Individual Values , 1951 .

[2]  J. French A formal theory of social power. , 1956, Psychology Review.

[3]  M. Degroot Reaching a Consensus , 1974 .

[4]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Problems in decentralized decision making and computation , 1984 .

[5]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Parallel and distributed computation , 1989 .

[6]  Fan Chung,et al.  Spectral Graph Theory , 1996 .

[7]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Directed diffusion: a scalable and robust communication paradigm for sensor networks , 2000, MobiCom '00.

[8]  Deborah Estrin,et al.  Computing aggregates for monitoring wireless sensor networks , 2003, Proceedings of the First IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Network Protocols and Applications, 2003..

[9]  Johannes Gehrke,et al.  Gossip-based computation of aggregate information , 2003, 44th Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings..

[10]  Jie Lin,et al.  Coordination of groups of mobile autonomous agents using nearest neighbor rules , 2003, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[11]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Consensus problems in networks of agents with switching topology and time-delays , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  A scheme for robust distributed sensor fusion based on average consensus , 2005, IPSN 2005. Fourth International Symposium on Information Processing in Sensor Networks, 2005..

[13]  J.N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Convergence in Multiagent Coordination, Consensus, and Flocking , 2005, Proceedings of the 44th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[14]  Luc Moreau,et al.  Stability of multiagent systems with time-dependent communication links , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[15]  Stephen P. Boyd,et al.  Randomized gossip algorithms , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Information Theory.

[16]  A. Dimakis,et al.  Geographic gossip: efficient aggregation for sensor networks , 2006, 2006 5th International Conference on Information Processing in Sensor Networks.

[17]  Sandro Zampieri,et al.  Randomized consensus algorithms over large scale networks , 2007, 2007 Information Theory and Applications Workshop.

[18]  S. Galam From 2000 Bush–Gore to 2006 Italian elections: voting at fifty-fifty and the contrarian effect , 2007, physics/0703095.

[19]  Asuman E. Ozdaglar,et al.  Distributed Subgradient Methods for Multi-Agent Optimization , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[20]  John N. Tsitsiklis,et al.  Convergence Speed in Distributed Consensus and Averaging , 2009, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[21]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  Naïve Learning in Social Networks and the Wisdom of Crowds , 2010 .

[22]  D. Boyd,et al.  Dynamic Debates: An Analysis of Group Polarization Over Time on Twitter , 2010 .

[23]  Roberto Tempo,et al.  Distributed Randomized Algorithms for the PageRank Computation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[24]  Behrouz Touri,et al.  On Ergodicity, Infinite Flow, and Consensus in Random Models , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[25]  Noah E. Friedkin,et al.  A Formal Theory of Reflected Appraisals in the Evolution of Power , 2011 .

[26]  Chiara Ravazzi,et al.  Gossips and Prejudices: Ergodic Randomized Dynamics in Social Networks , 2013, ArXiv.