Metastable evolutionary dynamics: Crossing fitness barriers or escaping via neutral paths?

We analytically study the dynamics of evolving populations that exhibit metastability on the level of phenotype or fitness. In constant selective environments, such metastable behavior is caused by two qualitatively different mechanisms. On the one hand, populations may become pinned at a local fitness optimum, being separated from higher-fitness genotypes by a fitness barrier of low-fitness genotypes. On the other hand, the population may only be metastable on the level of phenotype or fitness while, at the same time, diffusing over neutral networks of selectively neutral genotypes. Metastability occurs in this case because the population is separated from higher-fitness genotypes by an entropy barrier: the population must explore large portions of these neutral networks before it discovers a rare connection to fitter phenotypes.We derive analytical expressions for the barrier crossing times in both the fitness barrier and entropy barrier regime. In contrast with ‘landscape’ evolutionary models, we show that the waiting times to reach higher fitness depend strongly on the width of a fitness barrier and much less on its height. The analysis further shows that crossing entropy barriers is faster by orders of magnitude than fitness barrier crossing. Thus, when populations are trapped in a metastable phenotypic state, they are most likely to escape by crossing an entropy barrier, along a neutral path in genotype space. If no such escape route along a neutral path exists, a population is most likely to cross a fitness barrier where the barrier is narrowest, rather than where the barrier is shallowest.

[1]  J. Davenport Editor , 1960 .

[2]  M. Kimura,et al.  On the probability of fixation of mutant genes in a population. , 1962, Genetics.

[3]  T. E. Harris,et al.  The Theory of Branching Processes. , 1963 .

[4]  John Maynard Smith,et al.  Natural Selection and the Concept of a Protein Space , 1970, Nature.

[5]  S. Gould,et al.  Punctuated equilibria: the tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered , 1977, Paleobiology.

[6]  W. Ewens Mathematical Population Genetics , 1980 .

[7]  Sewall Wright,et al.  CHARACTER CHANGE, SPECIATION, AND THE HIGHER TAXA , 1982, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[8]  C. Gardiner Handbook of Stochastic Methods , 1983 .

[9]  R. Lande Expected time for random genetic drift of a population between stable phenotypic states. , 1985, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  C. Newman,et al.  Neo-darwinian evolution implies punctuated equilibria , 1985, Nature.

[11]  S. Kauffman,et al.  Towards a general theory of adaptive walks on rugged landscapes. , 1987, Journal of theoretical biology.

[12]  C. A. Macken,et al.  Protein evolution on rugged landscapes. , 1989, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[13]  M. Nowak,et al.  Error thresholds of replication in finite populations mutation frequencies and the onset of Muller's ratchet. , 1989, Journal of theoretical biology.

[14]  Y. Svirezhev,et al.  Diffusion Models of Population Genetics , 1990 .

[15]  B. Derrida,et al.  Evolution in a flat fitness landscape , 1991 .

[16]  Gérard Weisbuch,et al.  Complex Systems Dynamics , 1994 .

[17]  Prügel-Bennett,et al.  Analysis of genetic algorithms using statistical mechanics. , 1994, Physical review letters.

[18]  C. Adami,et al.  Self-organized criticality in living systems , 1994, adap-org/9401001.

[19]  M Mitchell,et al.  The evolution of emergent computation. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[20]  W. Ebeling Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry , 1995 .

[21]  M. Huynen,et al.  Smoothness within ruggedness: the role of neutrality in adaptation. , 1996, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[22]  R. Lenski,et al.  Punctuated Evolution Caused by Selection of Rare Beneficial Mutations , 1996, Science.

[23]  Marcus W. Feldman,et al.  Question Marks About the Period of Punctuation , 1996 .

[24]  S. Gavrilets Evolution and speciation on holey adaptive landscapes. , 1997, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[25]  J. Gravner,et al.  Percolation on the fitness hypercube and the evolution of reproductive isolation. , 1997, Journal of theoretical biology.

[26]  Melanie Mitchell,et al.  Finite populations induce metastability in evolutionary search , 1997 .

[27]  P. Schuster,et al.  Generic properties of combinatory maps: neutral networks of RNA secondary structures. , 1997, Bulletin of mathematical biology.

[28]  M. Newman,et al.  Effects of neutral selection on the evolution of molecular species , 1997, adap-org/9712005.

[29]  J. Crutchfield,et al.  Optimizing Epochal Evolutionary Search: Population-Size Dependent Theory , 1998, Machine-mediated learning.

[30]  F B Christiansen,et al.  Waiting with and without recombination: the time to production of a double mutant. , 1998, Theoretical population biology.

[31]  P. Schuster,et al.  IR-98-039 / April Continuity in Evolution : On the Nature of Transitions , 1998 .

[32]  L. Barnett Ruggedness and neutrality—the NKp family of fitness landscapes , 1998 .

[33]  Sergey Gavrilets,et al.  A Dynamical Theory of Speciation on Holey Adaptive Landscapes , 1998, The American Naturalist.

[34]  James P. Crutchfield,et al.  Statistical Dynamics of the Royal Road Genetic Algorithm , 1999, Theor. Comput. Sci..

[35]  E. Nimwegen The statistical dynamics of epochal evolution , 1999 .

[36]  T. Jukes,et al.  The neutral theory of molecular evolution. , 2000, Genetics.

[37]  J. Crutchfield,et al.  The Evolutionary Unfolding of Complexity , 1999, adap-org/9903001.