Analysis of local helix geometry in three B-DNA decamers and eight dodecamers.

Local variations in B-DNA helix structure are compared among three decamers and eight dodecamers, which contain examples of all ten base-pair step types. All pairwise combinations of helix parameters are compared by linear regression analysis, in a search for internal relationships as well as correlations with base sequence. The primary conclusions are: (1) Three-center hydrogen bonds between base-pairs occur frequently in the major groove at C-C, C-A, A-A and A-C steps, but are less convincing at C-C and C-T steps in the minor groove. The requirements for large base-pair propeller are (1) that the base-pair should be A.T rather than G.C, and (2) that it be involved in a major groove three-center hydrogen bond with the following base-pair. Either condition alone is insufficient. Hence, a large propeller is expected at the leading base-pair of A-A and A-C steps, but not at A-T, T-A, C-A or C-C steps. (2) A systematic and quantitative linkage exists between helix variables twist, rise, cup and roll, of such strength that the rise between base-pairs can hardly be described as an independent variable at all. Two typical patterns of behavior are observed at steps from one base-pair to the next: high twist profile (HTP), characterized by high twist, low rise, positive cup and negative roll, and low twist profile (LTP), marked by low twist, high rise; negative cup and positive roll. Examples of HTP are steps G-C, G-A and Y-C-A-R, where Y is pyrimidine and R is purine. Examples of LTP steps are C-G, G-G, A-G and C-A steps other than Y-C-A-R. (3) The minor groove is especially narrow across the two base-pairs of the following steps: A-T, T-A, A-A and G-A. (4) In general, base step geometry cannot be correlated solely with the bases that define the step in question; the two flanking steps also must be taken into account. Hence, local helix structure must be studied in the context, not of two base-pairs: A-B, but of four: x-A-B-y. Calladine's rules, although too simple in detail, were correct in defining the length of sequence over which a given perturbation is expressed. Whereas ten different two-base steps are possible, allowing for the identity of complementary sequences, there are 136 different four-base steps. Only 33 of these 136 four-base steps are represented in the decamer and dodecamer structures solved to date, and hence it is premature to try to set up detailed structural algorithms. (5) The sugar-phosphate backbone chains of B-DNA place strong limits on sequence-induced structural variation, damping down most variables within four or five base-pairs, and preventing purine-purine anti-anti mismatches from causing bulges in the double helix. Hence, although short-range sequence-induced deformations (or deformability) are observed, long-range deformations propagated down the helix are not to be expected.

[1]  Three-center (bifurcated) hydrogen bonding in the crystal structures of amino acids , 1984 .

[2]  R. Dickerson,et al.  Definitions and nomenclature of nucleic acid structure components. , 1989, Nucleic acids research.

[3]  J M Rosenberg,et al.  Structure of the DNA-Eco RI endonuclease recognition complex at 3 A resolution. , 1986, Science.

[4]  R. Dickerson,et al.  Base sequence and helix structure variation in B and A DNA. , 1983, Journal of molecular biology.

[5]  B. Matthews,et al.  High resolution structural studies of Cro repressor protein and implications for DNA recognition. , 1983, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[6]  H R Drew,et al.  Structure of a B-DNA dodecamer. II. Influence of base sequence on helix structure. , 1981, Journal of molecular biology.

[7]  Richard E. Dickerson,et al.  Crystal structure analysis of a complete turn of B-DNA , 1980, Nature.

[8]  H R Drew,et al.  Reversible bending and helix geometry in a B-DNA dodecamer: CGCGAATTBrCGCG. , 1982, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[9]  R. Dickerson,et al.  Structure of the B-DNA decamer C-C-A-A-C-G-T-T-G-G and comparison with isomorphous decamers C-C-A-A-G-A-T-T-G-G and C-C-A-G-G-C-C-T-G-G. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  Alexander Rich,et al.  Molecular Structure of the Netropsin-d(CGCGATATCGCG) Complex: DNA Conformation in an Alternating AT Segment , 1989 .

[11]  K. Campbell,et al.  Ryanodine receptor of skeletal muscle is a gap junction-type channel. , 1988, Science.

[12]  B. Matthews,et al.  Crystallization of a complex of cro repressor with a 17 base-pair operator. , 1986, Journal of molecular biology.

[13]  C R Calladine,et al.  Mechanics of sequence-dependent stacking of bases in B-DNA. , 1982, Journal of molecular biology.

[14]  U Heinemann,et al.  Helix geometry, hydration, and G.A mismatch in a B-DNA decamer. , 1987, Science.

[15]  S. Harrison,et al.  Structure of a phage 434 Cro/DNA complex , 1988, Nature.

[16]  A. Joachimiak,et al.  Crystal structure of trp represser/operator complex at atomic resolution , 1988, Nature.

[17]  W. Herr,et al.  OBP100 binds remarkably degenerate octamer motifs through specific interactions with flanking sequences. , 1988, Genes & development.

[18]  D S Goodsell,et al.  The effect of crystal packing on oligonucleotide double helix structure. , 1987, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[19]  U. Heinemann,et al.  Crystallographic study of one turn of G/C-rich B-DNA. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  R. Dickerson,et al.  Definitions and nomenclature of nucleic acid structure parameters. , 1989, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[21]  A. Klug,et al.  The structure of an oligo(dA)·oligo(dT) tract and its biological implications , 1987, Nature.

[22]  E. Westhof Re-refinement of the B-dodecamer d(CGCGAATTCGCG) with a comparative analysis of the solvent in it and in the Z-hexamer d(5BrCG5BrCG5BrCG). , 1987, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[23]  S. Phillips,et al.  Three-dimensional crystal structures of Escherichia coli met repressor with and without corepressor , 1989, Nature.

[24]  Johnf . Thompson,et al.  Cellular factors couple recombination with growth phase: Characterization of a new component in the λ site-specific recombination pathway , 1987, Cell.

[25]  M. Simon,et al.  Fis binding to the recombinational enhancer of the Hin DNA inversion system. , 1987, Genes & development.

[26]  S. Diekmann,et al.  Definitions and nomenclature of nucleic acid structure parameters. , 1989, The EMBO journal.

[27]  C. Peterson,et al.  Purified mu EBP-E binds to immunoglobulin enhancers and promoters , 1988, Molecular and cellular biology.

[28]  Jordan,et al.  Structure of the lambda complex at 2.5 A resolution: details of the repressor-operator interactions , 1988, Science.

[29]  M Ptashne,et al.  Recognition of a DNA operator by the repressor of phage 434: a view at high resolution , 1988, Science.

[30]  T. Steitz,et al.  Electrostatic calculations and model‐building suggest that DNA bound to CAP is sharply bent , 1987, Proteins.