Scale And Scope In Technology: Large Firms 1930/1990

We examine historical empirical patterns of change in corporate. technological scale and scope. Much literature on scale and scope by business and economic historians has conflated product markets and technology together. However, given the technologically complex environment of the late twentieth century, the relationship between scale and scope in production and products is not simple, and conflated discussions may be naive. Consequently we have two aims. Firstly, we wish to see if technological scale and scope follow the historical pattern of broader notions of scale and scope. Secondly, given increasing technological complexity, we consider whether the nature of corporate technological scope has changed over time. Using data drawn from the University of Reading's patents database, we examine the technological activities in 32 of the world's historically largest patenting firms over the period 1930 to 1990. Shin-sham analyses based on panel-data regressions examine the different influences on technologicascope over time. A technological trend closely resembling that of broader notions of scale to scope is observable in most of the sectors. although it does not proceed uniformly. We also find, that whilst increases in corporate technological scope through diversification are not particularly linked to technological relatedness in recent times, they are periodically influenced by the rise of pervasive, fast-growing new technologies.

[1]  A. Gambardella,et al.  Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry , 1998 .

[2]  Brian J. Loasby,et al.  The organisation of capabilities , 1998 .

[3]  D. Teece,et al.  DYNAMIC CAPABILITIES AND STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT , 1997 .

[4]  Richard R. Nelson,et al.  On the Sources and Significance of Interindustry Differences in Technological Opportunities , 1995 .

[6]  W. Scott,et al.  Tracking the Giant Corporation@@@Scale and Scope: The Dynamics of Industrial Capitalism. , 1991 .

[7]  J. Cantwell,et al.  The changing nature of corporate technological diversification and the importance of organisational capability , 1999 .

[8]  Cynthia A. Montgomery,et al.  Diversified expansion by large established firms , 1991 .

[9]  F. Kodama,et al.  Japanese innovation in mechatronics technology , 1986 .

[10]  Alfred D. Chandler Organizational Capabilities and the Economic History of the Industrial Enterprise , 1992 .

[11]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[12]  Naomi R. Lamoreaux,et al.  Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise , 1997 .

[13]  P. Stonham Diversification, refocusing and economic performance , 1996 .

[14]  K. Pavitt,et al.  The technological competencies of the world''s largest firms , 1997 .

[15]  G. Santangelo,et al.  Capitalism, profits and innovation in the new techno-economic paradigm , 2000 .

[16]  Christer Oskarsson,et al.  Technology Diversification: The Phenomenon, Its Causes and Effects , 1993 .

[17]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  The Size Distribution of Innovating Firms in the UK: 1945-1983 , 1987 .

[18]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  The Technological Specialization of Advanced Countries: A Report to the EEC on International Science and Technology Activities , 1992 .

[19]  Alfred D. Chandler The Competitive Performance of U.S. Industrial Enterprises since the Second World War , 1994, Business History Review.

[20]  John T. Scott,et al.  SCALE ECONOMIES IN RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT: THE SCHUMPETERIAN HYPOTHESIS , 1982 .

[21]  John Cantwell,et al.  Firms as the source of innovation and growth: the evolution of technological competence , 1999 .

[22]  C. Freeman Economics of Industrial Innovation , 1975 .

[23]  Luc Soete,et al.  The impact of technological innovation on international trade patterns: The evidence reconsidered* , 1987 .

[24]  David C. Mowery,et al.  The Boundaries of the U.S. Firm in R&D , 1995 .

[25]  C. Freeman,et al.  The Economics of Industrial Innovation - 3rd Edition , 1997 .

[26]  O. Granstrand,et al.  Multi-Technology Corporations: Why They Have “Distributed” Rather Than “Distinctive Core” Competencies , 1997 .

[27]  Keith Pavitt,et al.  USES AND ABUSES OF PATENT STATISTICS , 1988 .

[28]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Innovation and Learning: The Two Faces of R&D , 1989 .

[29]  C. Hill,et al.  A longitudinal study of the cause and consequences of changes in diversification in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry 1977–1986 , 1991 .

[30]  Richard Blundell,et al.  Returns to Scale in Research and Development : What Does the Schumpeterian Hypothesis Imply ? , 1999 .

[31]  Von Tunzelmann,et al.  Technology and Industrial Progress: The Foundations of Economic Growth , 1995 .

[32]  Constantinos C. Markides,et al.  Diversification, Refocusing, and Economic Performance , 1996 .

[33]  Franklin M. Fisher,et al.  Returns to Scale in Research and Development: What Does the Schumpeterian Hypothesis Imply? , 1973, Journal of Political Economy.

[34]  G. Symeonidis,et al.  Innovation, firm size and market structure , 1996 .

[35]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  Towards a theory of the technology-based firm 1 Paper originally presented at the workshop on `Techn , 1998 .

[36]  F. Kodama Technology fusion and the new R & D: Harvard Business Review, 70 (4), 70–78 (July/August 1992) , 1993 .

[37]  FlRM SlZE INNOVATION, FIRM SIZE AND MARKET STRUCTURE: SCHUMPETERIAN HYPOTHESES AND SOME NEW THEMES , 1996 .

[38]  Naomi R. Lamoreaux,et al.  Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise ed. by Naomi R. Lamoreaux, Daniel M. G. Raff (review) , 1996, Technology and Culture.

[39]  Don E. Kash,et al.  The Complexity Challenge: Technological Innovation for the 21st Century , 1999 .

[40]  Nick von Tunzelmann,et al.  Industry-specific competencies and converging technological systems: evidence from patents , 2001 .

[41]  O. Granstrand,et al.  Managing innovation in multi-technology corporations☆ , 1990 .

[42]  John Cantwell,et al.  New perspectives on the late Victorian economy: Historical trends in international patterns of technological innovation , 1991 .

[43]  Roberto Scazzieri,et al.  A Theory of Production: Tasks, Processes, and Technical Practices , 1993 .

[44]  Ove Granstrand,et al.  The economics and management of intellectual property : towards intellectual capitalism , 1999 .

[45]  Birgitte Andersen The hunt for S-shaped growth paths in technological innovation: a patent study* , 1999 .

[46]  R. Rumelt Strategy, structure, and economic performance , 1974 .

[47]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  The Technological Specialization of Advanced Countries , 1992 .