Variants of independence in the perception of facial identity and expression.

A prominent theory in the face perception literature--the parallel-route hypothesis (Bruce & Young, 1986)--assumes a dedicated channel for the processing of identity that is separate and independent from the channel(s) in which nonidentity information is processed (e.g., expression, eye gaze). The current work subjected this assumption to experimental tests from the perspective of three characterizations of independence and separability: Garner's speeded classification task (Garner, 1974), general recognition theory (Ashby & Townsend, 1986), and systems factorial technology (Townsend & Nozawa, 1995). The goals of the study were to (a) provide converging evidence on validity of the parallel-route hypothesis, and (b) understand the relationships between various definitions of independence and separability. The results of the current work demonstrated that identity and expression are not completely independent, using data from all three perspectives. Consequently, a modification of the central assumption of the parallel-route hypothesis is required. In addition, the intricate but orderly relationships between various types of separability and independence have implications for theories of perceptual independence.

[1]  Daniel R. Little,et al.  Logical-rule models of classification response times: a synthesis of mental-architecture, random-walk, and decision-bound approaches. , 2010, Psychological review.

[2]  L E Marks,et al.  Perceptual primacy of dimensions: support for a model of dimensional interaction. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[3]  R. Melara,et al.  Selective attention to Stroop dimensions: Effects of baseline discriminability, response mode, and practice , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Steven Yantis,et al.  An interactive race model of divided attention. , 1991 .

[5]  Vicki Bruce,et al.  Evaluating the independence of sex and expression in judgments of faces , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[6]  W. R. Garner.  The Processing of Information and Structure , 1974 .

[7]  S. Sternberg.  High-Speed Scanning in Human Memory , 1966, Science.

[8]  R. Schweickert.  Latent network theory: scheduling of processes in sentence verification and the Stroop effect. , 1983, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[9]  Richard Schweickert,et al.  A critical path generalization of the additive factor method: Analysis of a stroop task , 1978 .

[10]  Saul Sternberg,et al.  The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method , 1969 .

[11]  N. Etcoff,et al.  Selective attention to facial identity and facial emotion , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[12]  M. S. Mayzner,et al.  Human information processing : tutorials in performance and cognition , 1975 .

[13]  Jeff Miller,et al.  Divided attention: Evidence for coactivation with redundant signals , 1982, Cognitive Psychology.

[14]  Michael J Wenger,et al.  Preserving informational separability and violating decisional separability in facial perception and recognition. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[15]  J. Townsend,et al.  The serial-parallel dilemma: A case study in a linkage of theory and method , 2004, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[16]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Faces as Gestalt stimuli: Process characteristics. , 2001 .

[17]  E. Rosch,et al.  Cognition and Categorization , 1980 .

[18]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Expression is computed separately from facial identity, and it is computed separately for moving and static faces: Neuropsychological evidence , 1993, Neuropsychologia.

[19]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Methods of Modeling Capacity in Simple Processing Systems , 2014 .

[20]  J Kurucz,et al.  Prosopo‐Affective Agnosia as a Symptom of Cerebral Organic Disease , 1979, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society.

[21]  Y. Goshen-Gottstein,et al.  Perceptual integrality of sex and identity of faces: further evidence for the single-route hypothesis. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[22]  S. Sternberg,et al.  The meaning of additive reaction-time effects: tests of three alternatives , 1993 .

[23]  A M Burton,et al.  Asymmetric dependencies in perceiving identity and emotion: Experiments with morphed faces , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[24]  W T Maddox,et al.  On the dangers of averaging across observers when comparing decision bound models and generalized context models of categorization , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  James R. Pomerantz,et al.  CHAPTER 1 – Visual Form Perception: An Overview* , 1986 .

[26]  V. Bruce.  Influences of Familiarity on the Processing of Faces , 1986, Perception.

[27]  E. Rolls,et al.  Face and voice expression identification in patients with emotional and behavioural changes following ventral frontal lobe damage , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[28]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Predicting similarity and categorization from identification. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[29]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Asymmetric relationships among perceptions of facial identity, emotion, and facial speech. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov,et al.  Mental architectures with selectively influenced but stochastically interdependent components , 2004 .

[31]  A. Young,et al.  Repetition Priming and Face Processing: Priming Occurs within the System that Responds to the Identity of a Face , 1990, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[32]  S. Sternberg.  Memory Scanning: New Findings and Current Controversies , 1975 .

[33]  D. Perrett,et al.  Visual neurones responsive to faces in the monkey temporal cortex , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[34]  Tzvi Ganel,et al.  Effects of familiarity on the perceptual integrality of the identity and expression of faces: the parallel-route hypothesis revisited. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  J. Townsend.  SOME RESULTS CONCERNING THE IDENTIFIABILITY OF PARALLEL AND SERIAL PROCESSES , 1972 .

[36]  W. Todd Maddox,et al.  Perceptual and decisional separability. , 1992 .

[37]  R. Dolan,et al.  Contrast polarity and face recognition in the human fusiform gyrus , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[38]  A. Burton,et al.  Variability in photos of the same face , 2011, Cognition.

[39]  D. Perrett,et al.  A differential neural response in the human amygdala to fearful and happy facial expressions , 1996, Nature.

[40]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding the recognition of facial identity and facial expression , 2005, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[41]  E. Dzhafarov.  Unconditionally Selective Dependence of Random Variables on External Factors. , 2001, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[42]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Toward a Unified Theory of Similarity and Recognition , 1988 .

[43]  Scott E. Maxwell,et al.  Designing Experiments and Analyzing Data: A Model Comparison Perspective , 1990 .

[44]  S. Sternberg.  Memory-scanning: mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. , 1969, American scientist.

[45]  A. Young,et al.  Dissociable face processing impairments after brain injury. , 1991, Journal of clinical and experimental neuropsychology.

[46]  J T Townsend,et al.  Basic Response Time Tools for Studying General Processing Capacity in Attention, Perception, and Cognition , 2000, The Journal of general psychology.

[47]  F. Gregory Ashby,et al.  Multivariate probability distributions. , 1992 .

[48]  W. Estes,et al.  Risks of drawing inferences about cognitive processes from model fits to individual versus average performance , 2005, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[49]  Michael J Wenger,et al.  A strong test of the dual-mode hypothesis , 2005, Perception & psychophysics.

[50]  S. Macho.  Feature sampling in detection: implications for the measurement of perceptual independence. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[51]  Eileen C. Schwab,et al.  Pattern recognition by humans and machines , 1986 .

[52]  D. Algom,et al.  Stroop and Garner effects in comparative judgment of numerals: The role of attention. , 1999 .

[53]  Nick Donnelly,et al.  Perceptual and decisional factors influencing the discrimination of inversion in the Thatcher illusion. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[54]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Perceptual independence: definitions, models, and experimental paradigms. , 1969, Psychological bulletin.

[55]  W. T. Maddox,et al.  A response time theory of separability and integrality in speeded classification , 1994 .

[56]  N. Perrin,et al.  Varieties of perceptual independence. , 1986, Psychological review.

[57]  M. Wenger,et al.  Processing capacity under perceptual and cognitive load: a closer look at load theory. , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[58]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Operationism and the concept of perception. , 1956, Psychological review.

[59]  S. Rauch,et al.  Response and Habituation of the Human Amygdala during Visual Processing of Facial Expression , 1996, Neuron.

[60]  Kenji Kawano,et al.  Global and fine information coded by single neurons in the temporal visual cortex , 1999, Nature.

[61]  James T. Townsend,et al.  Implications of marginal and conditional detection parameters for the separabilities and independence of perceptual dimensions , 1992 .

[62]  D. Algom,et al.  Driven by information: a tectonic theory of Stroop effects. , 2003, Psychological review.

[63]  Robin D. Thomas.  Gaussian general recognition theory and perceptual independence. , 1995 .

[64]  M. Hasselmo,et al.  The role of expression and identity in the face-selective responses of neurons in the temporal visual cortex of the monkey , 1989, Behavioural Brain Research.

[65]  L. Marks,et al.  Hard andsoft interacting dimensions: Differential effects of dual context on classification , 1990, Perception & psychophysics.

[66]  M. Wenger,et al.  An Investigation of Perceptual and Decisional Influences on the Perception of Hierarchical Forms , 2006, Perception.

[67]  W. R. Garner,et al.  Integrality of stimulus dimensions in various types of information processing , 1970 .

[68]  D. Vorberg,et al.  Distribution inequalities for parallel models with unlimited capacity , 1994 .

[69]  R. Nosofsky,et al.  Information-processing architectures in multidimensional classification: a validation test of the systems factorial technology. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[70]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding face recognition. , 1986, British journal of psychology.

[71]  James T. Townsend,et al.  The Stochastic Modeling of Elementary Psychological Processes , 1983 .

[72]  R. Nosofsky.  Attention, similarity, and the identification-categorization relationship. , 1986, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[73]  H E Egeth,et al.  Response time and accuracy revisited: converging support for the interactive race model. , 1993, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[74]  J. Haxby,et al.  Human neural systems for face recognition and social communication , 2002, Biological Psychiatry.

[75]  Deborah J. Hellawell,et al.  Facial expression processing after amygdalotomy , 1996, Neuropsychologia.

[76]  Estes Wk.  The problem of inference from curves based on group data. , 1956 .

[77]  Samuel Shaki,et al.  The role of parity, physical size, and magnitude in numerical cognition: The SNARC effect revisited , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[78]  A. J. Mistlin,et al.  Neurones responsive to faces in the temporal cortex: studies of functional organization, sensitivity to identity and relation to perception. , 1984, Human neurobiology.

[79]  Michael J Wenger,et al.  A decisional component of holistic encoding. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[80]  D. Algom,et al.  The perception of number from the separability of the stimulus: The Stroop effect revisited , 1996, Memory & cognition.

[81]  E Galanter,et al.  A significance test for one parameter isosensitivity functions , 1967, Psychometrika.

[82]  E. Dzhafarov.  Selective influence through conditional independence , 2003 .

[83]  R. Schweickert,et al.  Selective Influence and Response Time Cumulative Distribution Functions in Serial-Parallel Task Networks. , 2000, Journal of mathematical psychology.

[84]  R. Shepard.  Attention and the metric structure of the stimulus space. , 1964 .

[85]  J. Townsend,et al.  Stochastic dependencies in parallel and serial models: effects on systems factorial interactions , 1994 .

[86]  P. Ekman.  Emotion in the human face , 1982 .

[87]  Nicolas Franck,et al.  Selective attention to facial emotion and identity in schizophrenia , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[88]  J. Townsend,et al.  A theory of interactive parallel processing: new capacity measures and predictions for a response time inequality series. , 2004, Psychological review.

[89]  A. Damasio,et al.  Intact recognition of facial expression, gender, and age in patients with impaired recognition of face identity , 1988, Neurology.

[90]  S. Schweinberger,et al.  Expression Influences the Recognition of Familiar Faces , 2004, Perception.

[91]  Thomas J. Palmeri,et al.  An Exemplar-Based Random Walk Model of Speeded Classification , 1997 .

[92]  G R Grice,et al.  Absence of a redundant-signals effect in a reaction time task with divided attention , 1984, Perception & psychophysics.

[93]  R A Johnston,et al.  Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model. , 1990, British journal of psychology.

[94]  A. Burton,et al.  Mental representations of familiar faces. , 2011, British journal of psychology.

[95]  James T. Townsend,et al.  A trichotomy: Interactions of factors prolonging sequential and concurrent mental processes in stochastic discrete mental (PERT) networks , 1989 .

[96]  Gregory Ashby,et al.  On the Dangers of Averaging Across Subjects When Using Multidimensional Scaling or the Similarity-Choice Model , 1994 .

[97]  R D Thomas,et al.  Perceptual interactions of facial dimensions in speeded classification and identification , 2001, Perception & psychophysics.

[98]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[99]  J. Townsend,et al.  Spatio-temporal properties of elementary perception: an investigation of parallel, serial, and coactive theories , 1995 .

[100]  D. Massaro,et al.  Featural evaluation, integration, and judgment of facial affect. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.