Efficacy of pre-scan beta-blockade and impact of heart rate on image quality in patients undergoing coronary multidetector computed tomography angiography.

OBJECTIVE While beta-blockers are routinely administered to patients prior to coronary computed tomography angiography (CTA), their effectiveness is unknown. We therefore assessed the efficacy of beta-blockade with regards to heart rate (HR) control and image quality in an unselected patient cohort. METHODS We studied 150 consecutive patients (104 men/46 female; mean age, 56+/-13 years) referred for coronary CTA. Intravenous metoprolol (5-20mg) was administered to patients with a HR >65 beats per minute (bpm). The goal HR was defined as an average HR <65 bpm without a single measurement above 68 bpm. RESULTS Overall, 45% (68/150) of patients met the HR criteria for beta-blocker administration of which 76% (52/68) received metoprolol (mean dose 12+/-10mg). Of the 52 patients who received beta-blocker versus the 98 who did not, 18 (35%) versus 62 (64%) patients achieved the goal HR, respectively. All patients who achieved the target HR had an evaluable CTA while five patients who did not achieve the target HR had at least one non-evaluable coronary artery due to motion artifact. There was also a significant reduction in any motion artifact among those who achieved the goal HR as compared to those who did not (p=0.001). Logistic regression revealed an increase in the odds of stair step artifact of 11.6% (95% CI: 2.4% decrease, 27.5% increase) per 1 bpm increase in the standard deviation of scan HR. CONCLUSION Overall, efficacy of beta-blocker administration to reach target HR is limited. Improvements in CT scanner temporal resolution are mandatory to achieve consistently high image quality independent of HR and beta-blocker administration.

[1]  Thomas J Vogl,et al.  Multi-detector row CT coronary angiography: influence of reconstruction technique and heart rate on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[2]  C. Claussen,et al.  Non-invasive coronary angiography with high resolution multidetector-row computed tomography. Results in 102 patients. , 2002, European heart journal.

[3]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Detection of Calcified and Noncalcified Coronary Atherosclerotic Plaque by Contrast-Enhanced, Submillimeter Multidetector Spiral Computed Tomography: A Segment-Based Comparison With Intravascular Ultrasound , 2003, Circulation.

[4]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Quantitative parameters of image quality in multidetector spiral computed tomographic coronary imaging with submillimeter collimation. , 2003, The American journal of cardiology.

[5]  Michael Grass,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with 16-detector row CT: effect of heart rate. , 2005, Radiology.

[6]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Comparison of measurement of cross-sectional coronary atherosclerotic plaque and vessel areas by 16-slice multidetector computed tomography versus intravascular ultrasound. , 2004, The American journal of cardiology.

[7]  M. Reiser,et al.  Detection of Coronary Artery Stenoses With Multislice Helical CT Angiography , 2002, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[8]  C. White,et al.  Non-invasive intravenous coronary angiography using electron beam tomography and multislice computed tomography , 2003, Heart.

[9]  Matthijs Oudkerk,et al.  Coronary angiography with multi-slice computed tomography , 2001, The Lancet.

[10]  S. Achenbach,et al.  Comparison of the degree of coronary stenoses by multidetector computed tomography versus by quantitative coronary angiography. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[11]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Noninvasive coronary angiography with 64-section CT: effect of average heart rate and heart rate variability on image quality. , 2006, Radiology.

[12]  P. Serruys,et al.  Large thrombus entrapped in a patent foramen ovale of the atrial septum, which apparently “disappeared” without embolic events , 2002, Heart.

[13]  Gabriel P. Krestin,et al.  High-Resolution Spiral Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography in Patients Referred for Diagnostic Conventional Coronary Angiography , 2005, Circulation.

[14]  G. Raff,et al.  Diagnostic accuracy of noninvasive coronary angiography using 64-slice spiral computed tomography. , 2005, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[15]  Simon Wildermuth,et al.  Accuracy of MSCT coronary angiography with 64-slice technology: first experience. , 2005 .

[16]  Udo Hoffmann,et al.  Assessment of coronary remodeling in stenotic and nonstenotic coronary atherosclerotic lesions by multidetector spiral computed tomography. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[17]  Konstantin Nikolaou,et al.  Accuracy of multidetector spiral computed tomography in identifying and differentiating the composition of coronary atherosclerotic plaques: a comparative study with intracoronary ultrasound. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[18]  E. Wenkel,et al.  Noninvasive visualization of coronary arteries using contrast-enhanced multidetector CT: influence of heart rate on image quality and stenosis detection. , 2002, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[19]  Jeroen J. Bax,et al.  Cardiac multidetector-row computed tomography in patients with unstable angina. , 2005, The American journal of cardiology.

[20]  Qiao-wei Zhang,et al.  Evaluation of computed tomography coronary angiography in patients with a high heart rate using 16-slice spiral computed tomography with 0.37-s gantry rotation time , 2005, European Radiology.

[21]  Ulrich Baum,et al.  Usefulness of multidetector row spiral computed tomography with 64- x 0.6-mm collimation and 330-ms rotation for the noninvasive detection of significant coronary artery stenoses. , 2006, The American journal of cardiology.

[22]  Masahiko Kato,et al.  Noninvasive assessment of coronary artery disease by multislice spiral computed tomography using a new retrospectively ECG-gated image reconstruction technique. , 2003, Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society.