DIG-seq: a genome-wide CRISPR off-target profiling method using chromatin DNA

To investigate whether and how CRISPR-Cas9 on-target and off-target activities are affected by chromatin in eukaryotic cells, we first identified a series of identical endogenous DNA sequences present in both open and closed chromatin regions and then measured mutation frequencies at these sites in human cells using Cas9 complexed with matched or mismatched sgRNAs. Unlike matched sgRNAs, mismatched sgRNAs were highly sensitive to chromatin states, suggesting that off-target but not on-target DNA cleavage is hindered by chromatin. We next performed Digenome-seq using cell-free chromatin DNA (now termed DIG-seq) and histone-free genomic DNA in parallel and found that only a subset of sites, cleaved in histone-free DNA, were cut in chromatin DNA, suggesting that chromatin can inhibit Cas9 off-target effects in favor of its genome-wide specificity in cells.

[1]  David A. Scott,et al.  Genome-wide binding of the CRISPR endonuclease Cas9 in mammalian cells , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[2]  Max A. Horlbeck,et al.  Nucleosomes impede Cas9 access to DNA in vivo and in vitro , 2016, eLife.

[3]  John J. Wyrick,et al.  Nucleosomes Selectively Inhibit Cas9 Off-target Activity at a Site Located at the Nucleosome Edge* , 2016, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[4]  Jin-Soo Kim,et al.  Measuring and Reducing Off-Target Activities of Programmable Nucleases Including CRISPR-Cas9 , 2015, Molecules and cells.

[5]  Thomas D. Schmittgen,et al.  Analyzing real-time PCR data by the comparative CT method , 2008, Nature Protocols.

[6]  David A. Brafman,et al.  The Impact of Chromatin Dynamics on Cas9-Mediated Genome Editing in Human Cells. , 2017, ACS synthetic biology.

[7]  J. Joung,et al.  Defining and improving the genome-wide specificities of CRISPR–Cas9 nucleases , 2016, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[8]  Seung Woo Cho,et al.  Targeted genome engineering in human cells with the Cas9 RNA-guided endonuclease , 2013, Nature Biotechnology.

[9]  Jin-Wu Nam,et al.  In vivo high-throughput profiling of CRISPR–Cpf1 activity , 2016, Nature Methods.

[10]  M. Gonçalves,et al.  Probing the impact of chromatin conformation on genome editing tools , 2016, Nucleic acids research.

[11]  Martin J. Aryee,et al.  GUIDE-Seq enables genome-wide profiling of off-target cleavage by CRISPR-Cas nucleases , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[12]  Data production leads,et al.  An integrated encyclopedia of DNA elements in the human genome , 2012 .

[13]  James E. DiCarlo,et al.  RNA-Guided Human Genome Engineering via Cas9 , 2013, Science.

[14]  Kristopher T. Jensen,et al.  Chromatin accessibility and guide sequence secondary structure affect CRISPR‐Cas9 gene editing efficiency , 2017, FEBS letters.

[15]  W. Lim,et al.  Nucleosome breathing and remodeling constrain CRISPR-Cas9 function , 2016, eLife.

[16]  Jin-Soo Kim,et al.  Cas-analyzer: an online tool for assessing genome editing results using NGS data , 2016, Bioinform..

[17]  Charles E. Vejnar,et al.  CRISPRscan: designing highly efficient sgRNAs for CRISPR/Cas9 targeting in vivo , 2015, Nature Methods.

[18]  J. Joung,et al.  CIRCLE-seq: a highly sensitive in vitro screen for genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 nuclease off-targets , 2017, Nature Methods.

[19]  Leslie S. Edwards,et al.  Mapping the genomic landscape of CRISPR–Cas9 cleavage , 2017, Nature Methods.

[20]  Le Cong,et al.  Multiplex Genome Engineering Using CRISPR/Cas Systems , 2013, Science.

[21]  Jong-il Kim,et al.  Digenome-seq: genome-wide profiling of CRISPR-Cas9 off-target effects in human cells , 2015, Nature Methods.

[22]  Mazhar Adli,et al.  Genome-wide analysis reveals characteristics of off-target sites bound by the Cas9 endonuclease , 2014, Nature Biotechnology.

[23]  Jin-Soo Kim,et al.  Genome-wide target specificities of CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases revealed by multiplex Digenome-seq , 2016, Genome research.