Field-induced optical effect in a five-step asymmetric coupled quantum well with modified potential

A five-step asymmetric coupled quantum well (FACQW) is demonstrated and analyzed for its field-induced optical effect. A strong combined exciton absorption peak is caused by e1hh2 and e2hh1 transitions for the TE mode and e1lh2 and e2lh1 for the TM mode at a small negative applied electric field, while two separated exciton absorption peaks appear at positive applied electric field. The large change of the exciton absorption strength produces large positive refractive index change whose value is larger by over one order of magnitude compared to that in a rectangular quantum well (RQW) when the operation wavelength is away from the absorption edge. A tensile-strained FACQW is employed to improve the polarization dependence. The difference of the refractive index change for TE and TM modes is under 2% while that in the unstrained FACQW is larger than 50%. A modified FACQW structure is also studied for a negative refractive index change. The strong combined exciton absorption peak without a red shift is observed in the measurement of photocurrent spectra of the FACQW at room temperature. The absorption properties of the FACQW under high applied electric field are also observed and analyzed. The measured results are in good agreement with bur numerical analysis. Finally, ridge-waveguide Mach-Zehnder modulators have been fabricated by using the FACQW and RQW structures. The half-wave voltage of the FACQW modulator is as low as 3 V while that of the RQW modulator is 8 V. The result proves that the FACQW structure indeed has larger refractive index change than that of the RQW structure. These properties obtained with the FACQW family have a great potential for application to ultrafast and low-voltage optical modulators and switches.

[1]  R.W.H. Engelmann,et al.  A semi-empirical model for electroabsorption in GaAs/AlGaAs multiple quantum well modulator structures , 1990 .

[2]  Brum,et al.  Electric-field-induced dissociation of excitons in semiconductor quantum wells. , 1985, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[3]  S. Nishimura,et al.  Electrooptic effects in an InGaAs/InAlAs multiquantum well structure , 1992, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[4]  M. Wegener,et al.  Large refractive index changes in tunable-electron-density InGaAs/InAlAs quantum wells , 1990, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[5]  Jin Wang,et al.  Time response of a tunable‐electron‐density quantum well and reservoir structure , 1991 .

[6]  Yasushi Takahashi,et al.  Analysis of microwave characteristics of coplanar traveling wave electrodes on III-V semiconductor with an n/sup +/ doped layer , 1995 .

[7]  C. A. Burrus,et al.  Electro‐optic phase modulation in GaAs/AlGaAs quantum well waveguides , 1988 .

[8]  Wood,et al.  Electric field dependence of optical absorption near the band gap of quantum-well structures. , 1985, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[9]  K. Tada,et al.  Large field-induced refractive index change without red shift of absorption edge in five-step asymmetric coupled quantum wells with modified potential , 1997, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[10]  K. Tada,et al.  A Study on Electroabsorption Effects in Coupled Quantum Wells , 1993 .

[11]  K. Tada,et al.  Polarization-independent waveguide modulator using a novel quantum well with mass-dependent width , 1994, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters.

[12]  Kerr,et al.  Stark effect in strongly coupled quantum wells. , 1988, Physical review. B, Condensed matter.

[13]  David A. B. Miller,et al.  Electroabsorption in GaAs/AlGaAs coupled quantum well waveguides , 1987 .

[14]  C. Thirstrup,et al.  Refractive index modulation based on excitonic effects in GaInAs-InP coupled asymmetric quantum wells , 1995 .

[15]  Masamichi Yamanishi,et al.  Field effects on the refractive index and absorption coefficient in AlGaAs quantum well structures and their feasibility for electrooptic device applications , 1987 .

[16]  Yoshiaki Nakano,et al.  Polarization-independent large field-induced refractive index change in a strained five-step GaAs–InAlGaAs asymmetric coupled quantum well , 1997 .

[17]  D. Miller,et al.  Quadratic electro‐optic effect due to the quantum‐confined Stark effect in quantum wells , 1987 .

[18]  K. Tada,et al.  Observation of Quantum-Confined Stark Effect in a Graded-Gap Quantum Well , 1989 .

[19]  N. Susa,et al.  Electric-field-induced refractive index changes in InGaAs-InAlAs asymmetric coupled quantum wells , 1995 .

[20]  Kunio Tada,et al.  Quantum-Confined Stark Effect in a Parabolic-Potential Quantum Well , 1990 .

[21]  Kunio Tada,et al.  Polarization‐independent optical waveguide intensity switch with parabolic quantum well , 1991 .

[22]  K. Tada,et al.  Field induced optical effects in coupled quantum wells , 1991 .

[23]  N. Susa,et al.  Electric‐field‐induced refractive index changes in three‐step asymmetric coupled quantum wells , 1993 .