Target volume uncertainty and a method to visualize its effect on the target dose prescription.

PURPOSE To consider the uncertainty in the construction of target boundaries for optimization, and to demonstrate how the principles of mathematical programming can be applied to determine and display the effect on the tumor dose of making small changes to the target boundary. METHODS The effect on the achievable target dose of making successive small shifts to the target boundary within its range of uncertainty was found by constructing a mixed-integer linear program that automated the placement of the beam angles using the initial target volume. RESULTS The method was demonstrated using contours taken from a nasopharynx case, with dose limits placed on surrounding structures. In the illustrated case, enlarging the target anteriorly to provide greater assurance of disease coverage did not force a sacrifice in the minimum or mean tumor doses. However, enlarging the margin posteriorly, near a critical structure, dramatically changed the minimum, mean, and maximum tumor doses. CONCLUSION Tradeoffs between the position of the target boundary and the minimum target dose can be developed using mixed-integer programming, and the results projected as a guide to contouring and plan selection.

[1]  J. Deasy Multiple local minima in radiotherapy optimization problems with dose-volume constraints. , 1997, Medical physics.

[2]  George B. Dantzig,et al.  Linear programming and extensions , 1965 .

[3]  S Senan,et al.  A simplified CT-based definition of the lymph node levels in the node negative neck. , 1999, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[4]  C. N. Coleman,et al.  Radiation Oncology--Linking Technology and Biology in the Treatment of Cancer , 2002, Acta oncologica.

[5]  David Sonderman,et al.  Radiotherapy Treatment Design Using Mathematical Programming Models , 1985, Oper. Res..

[6]  J. Pekny,et al.  Exact solution of the no-wait flowshop scheduling problem with a comparison to heuristic methods , 1991 .

[7]  Harold O. Wyckoff,et al.  International Commission ON Radiation Units and Measurements (ICRU). , 1974, The American journal of roentgenology, radium therapy, and nuclear medicine.

[8]  P C Levendag,et al.  A three-dimensional CT-based target definition for elective irradiation of the neck. , 1999, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[9]  L. F. Cazzaniga,et al.  Interphysician variability in defining the planning target volume in the irradiation of prostate and seminal vesicles. , 1998, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[10]  Avraham Eisbruch,et al.  Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for locally advanced paranasal sinus tumors: incorporating clinical decisions in the optimization process. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[11]  A. Niemierko,et al.  Methodological issues in radiation dose-volume outcome analyses: summary of a joint AAPM/NIH workshop. , 2002, Medical physics.

[12]  D L McShan,et al.  Is uniform target dose possible in IMRT plans in the head and neck? , 2002, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[13]  Eva K. Lee,et al.  Integer Programming Applied to Intensity-Modulated Radiation Therapy Treatment Planning , 2003, Ann. Oper. Res..

[14]  T LoSasso,et al.  Treatment planning and delivery of intensity-modulated radiation therapy for primary nasopharynx cancer. , 2001, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[15]  K. Ang,et al.  CT-based delineation of lymph node levels and related CTVs in the node-negative neck: DAHANCA, EORTC, GORTEC, NCIC,RTOG consensus guidelines. , 2003, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  D. Low,et al.  A critical evaluation of the planning target volume for 3-D conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer. , 1998, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[17]  Eva K. Lee,et al.  Operations research applied to radiotherapy, an NCI-NSF-sponsored workshop February 7-9, 2002. , 2003, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  P Kijewski,et al.  The effect on minimum tumor dose of restricting target-dose inhomogeneity in optimized three-dimensional treatment of lung cancer. , 1991, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[19]  J. Shapiro,et al.  Large scale optimization of beam weights under dose-volume restrictions. , 1990, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[20]  Y. Yu,et al.  Multiobjective decision theory for computational optimization in radiation therapy. , 1997, Medical physics.

[21]  S. Spirou,et al.  A gradient inverse planning algorithm with dose-volume constraints. , 1998, Medical physics.

[22]  Ronald L. Rardin,et al.  A coupled column generation, mixed integer approach to optimal planning of intensity modulated radiation therapy for cancer , 2004, Math. Program..

[23]  D. Dearnaley,et al.  Target volume definition in conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer: quality assurance in the MRC RT-01 trial. , 2000, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[24]  A. Land,et al.  An Automatic Method for Solving Discrete Programming Problems , 1960, 50 Years of Integer Programming.