Load and Resistance Factors and Design Parameter Offsets for Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide

An approach to developing load and resistance factors and design parameter offsets for inputs to the Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Guide (MEPDG) is provided for the purpose of ensuring, with a high level of probability, that the MEPDG-predicted distress at any level of reliability does not exceed a given threshold. In the proposed approach, the two most significant sources of uncertainty in pavement design—input variability and model prediction error—are handled separately. The proposed method involves four major steps: experimental design, surrogate model estimation, model verification, and calculation of load and resistance factors and design offsets with the inverse first-order reliability method. The proposed method allows pavement engineers to account for uncertainty in loading and resistance parameters in a similar manner to the load and resistance factor design provisions of the American Institute of Steel Construction's Steel Construction Manual and the American Concrete Institute's ACI 318: Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete. The proposed methods are illustrated for a typical flexible pavement.

[1]  Lev Khazanovich,et al.  Probabilistic Numerical Simulation of Pavement Performance using MEPDG , 2010 .

[2]  Andy J. Keane,et al.  Engineering Design via Surrogate Modelling - A Practical Guide , 2008 .

[3]  James L Noland,et al.  Computer-Aided Structural Engineering (CASE) Project: Decision Logic Table Formulation of ACI (American Concrete Institute) 318-77 Building Code Requirements for Reinforced Concrete for Automated Constraint Processing. Volume 1. , 1986 .

[4]  David H Timm,et al.  Development of Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design in Minnesota , 1998 .

[5]  Jennifer Q Retherford,et al.  Reliability Methods Applicable to Mechanistic–Empirical Pavement Design Method , 2010 .

[6]  Theodore V. Galambos,et al.  Incorporation of Reliability into Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design , 2000 .

[7]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Validation and error estimation of computational models , 2006, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[8]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  A System of Systems Approach for Effects-Based Operational Planning Under Uncertainty , 2011 .

[9]  H. Jeffreys,et al.  Theory of probability , 1896 .

[10]  Achintya Haldar,et al.  Probability, Reliability and Statistical Methods in Engineering Design (Haldar, Mahadevan) , 1999 .

[11]  Lev Khazanovich,et al.  Reliability analysis of cracking and faulting prediction in the new mechanistic-empirical pavement design procedure , 2005 .

[12]  Ramesh Rebba,et al.  Computational methods for model reliability assessment , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[13]  Sankaran Mahadevan,et al.  Model Predictive Capability Assessment Under Uncertainty , 2005 .

[14]  Senthilmurugan Thyagarajan,et al.  Efficient Simulation Techniques for Reliability Analysis of Flexible Pavements Using the Mechanistic-Empirical Pavement Design Guide , 2011 .

[15]  Ahmed Alsherri,et al.  Reliability Model for Pavement Performance , 1988 .