Use of Injectable Transponders for the Identification and Traceability of Pigs

Individual identification in pigs is a key point for management, traceability and trade control. The aim of this experiment was to study retention rate and functionality of electronic identification systems in pigs, injected in different sites, evaluate traceability of animals and highlight histopathological alterations of tissues in different inoculation sites. A total of 60 crossbred piglets were used to compare different transponder inoculation sites. One group (15 piglets) was identified only by plastic ear-tags, while three groups were identified by passive injectable transponders (PIT), with different inoculation sites. Pigs were slaughtered in two different moments, in order to evaluate injection sites, macroscopically and histologically, either 50 days after injection or at a normal slaughtering weight. In general, no apparent animal health problems were observed the day after the injection or during the control readings performed during the experiment. Intraperitoneal localization gave excellent results in term of readability until the slaughter time. Transponders at the slaughter line were always recovered in the viscera tray, as they were found loose in the peritoneal cavity. In some cases, they were found on the carcasses, attached to the peritoneum. In those cases a sample of peritoneal tissue was collected for histological examination. A reparative chronic reaction with moderate and multifocal fibrosis and neoformed vessels associated to multifocal and mild lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate were detected. In one case (6.7%) the transponder was found on the visceral side of the liver and the histological examination highlighted a localized superficial hepatic atrophy by compression. Retroauricolar site of injection gave lower readability results, as 2 transponders (13.3%) were no more readable during the first month after injection. No lesions were found with this inoculation site. PIT injected in the perineal region were operative until slaughter time. Recovery procedures at the slaughterhouse were simple for animals slaughtered at a low weight, but much more difficult in the case of heavy pigs. Moreover, in three cases (20%), PITs were no more in the subcutaneous tissue but had an intramuscular localization. The histological examination of the muscles revealed a chronic reparative process. In our experiment, injectable transponders in the intraperitoneal position provided the best identification system for pigs. Histo -pathological examination revealed only local reparative processes in the tissues interested by PIT contact, and no other pathological changes.

[1]  E. Lambooy,et al.  Technique and injection place of electronic identification numbers in pigs , 1989 .

[2]  J. W. M. Merks,et al.  Injectable electronic identification systems in pig production. , 1990 .

[3]  E. Lambooij Positioning of identification transponders in the auricle of pigs , 1992, Veterinary Record.

[4]  R. Blair,et al.  Electronic animal identification for controlling feed delivery and detecting estrus in gilts and sows in outside pens. , 1994, Journal of animal science.

[5]  N. G. Langeveld,et al.  Electronic identification with injectable transponders in pig production: results of a field trail on commercial farms and slaughterhouses concerning injectability and retrievability. , 1995, The Veterinary quarterly.

[6]  E Lambooij,et al.  Effects of injecting electronic transponders into the auricle of pigs , 1995, Veterinary Record.

[7]  J. A. Fernandez,et al.  The science and practice of pig production , 1995 .

[8]  Dirk U. Pfeiffer,et al.  Comparison of electronic and visual identification systems in pigs , 1998 .

[9]  G Caja,et al.  Effects of injection position and transponder size on the performances of passive injectable transponders used for the electronic identification of cattle. , 2000, Journal of animal science.

[10]  G Caja,et al.  The use of passive injectable transponders in fattening lambs from birth to slaughter: effects of injection position, age, and breed. , 2002, Journal of animal science.

[11]  G Caja,et al.  Use of ear tags and injectable transponders for the identification and traceability of pigs from birth to the end of the slaughter line. , 2005, Journal of animal science.