Worst-Case Groundness Analysis Using Positive Boolean Functions
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Shin-ichi Minato,et al. Graph-Based Representations of Discrete Functions , 1996 .
[2] Randal E. Bryant,et al. Graph-Based Algorithms for Boolean Function Manipulation , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Computers.
[3] Roberto Bagnara. A Reactive Implementation of Pos Using ROBDDs , 1996, PLILP.
[4] Kim Marriott,et al. Boolean Functions for Dependency Analysis: Algebraic Properties and Efficient Representation , 1994, SAS.
[5] Kim Marriott,et al. Precise and efficient groundness analysis for logic programs , 1993, LOPL.
[6] P. Hill,et al. Widening Pos for Efficient and Scalable Groundness Analysis of Logic Programs , 1998 .
[7] Pascal Van Hentenryck,et al. Evaluation of the Domain Prop , 1995, J. Log. Program..
[8] Andy King,et al. Quotienting Share for Dependency Analysis , 1999, ESOP.
[9] Patrick Cousot,et al. Comparing the Galois Connection and Widening/Narrowing Approaches to Abstract Interpretation , 1992, PLILP.
[10] Antoine Rauzy,et al. Efficient Bottom-up Abstract Interpretation of Prolog by Means of Constraint Solving over Symbolic Finite Domains , 1993, PLILP.
[11] Christian Fecht,et al. Abstrakte Interpretation logischer Programme - Theorie, Implementierung, Generierung , 1997 .
[12] Roberto Bagnara,et al. Factorizing Equivalent Variable Pairs in ROBDD-Based Implementations of Pos , 1998, AMAST.