A three-year comparative study of dominant misconceptions among first-year physics students at a South African university

This article discusses a three-year study (2020–2022) of dominant misconceptions (DMs) for a large cohort of first-year physics course students at the University of Johannesburg, South Africa. Our study considered pre-test scores on the force concept inventory using a graphical method, where we found statistical differences between the mean DM scores for the 2020 cohort, as compared to the 2021 and 2022 cohort; possibly due to the onset of COVID lockdowns. We also compared our data from South Africa with cohorts based in Spain and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, where the method of DMs was also applied. From this comparison, we found some differences in the preconception knowledge of the cohorts. Furthermore, we included an analysis of DMs through the ‘gender lens’ for the South African cohort, finding no statistically significant difference between the means for DM scores of students who identify as male or female. Finally, given the diverse language backgrounds and levels of matriculation preparation foruniversity level physics courses, we have also shown how quickly responding to student misconceptions can be efficiently addressed using the method of DMs.

[1]  C. Singh,et al.  Gender differences in students’ self-efficacy in introductory physics courses in which women outnumber men predict their grade , 2022, Physical Review Physics Education Research.

[2]  Elaine Christman,et al.  Examining the relation of high school preparation and college achievement to conceptual understanding , 2022, Physical Review Physics Education Research.

[3]  F. Kaddari,et al.  Force and motion misconceptions’ pliability, the case of Moroccan high school students , 2022, The Journal of Educational Research.

[4]  C. Singh,et al.  Gender differences in test anxiety and self-efficacy: why instructors should emphasize low-stakes formative assessments in physics courses , 2022, European Journal of Physics.

[5]  Sungwon Kim,et al.  Roles of emotions induced by immediate feedback in a physics problem-solving activity , 2021 .

[6]  E. Carleschi,et al.  Probing the effect on student conceptual understanding due to a forced mid-semester transition to online teaching , 2021, European journal of physics.

[7]  Creso M. Sá,et al.  Gender gaps in research productivity and recognition among elite scientists in the U.S., Canada, and South Africa , 2020, PloS one.

[8]  Regina F. Frey,et al.  Force Concept Inventory: More than just conceptual understanding , 2020 .

[9]  Eleanor C. Sayre,et al.  PhysPort Use and Growth: Supporting Physics Teaching with Research-based Resources Since 2011 , 2019, 1905.03745.

[10]  H. Nitta,et al.  An Alternative Learning Gain Based on the Rasch Model , 2019, The Physics Educator.

[11]  Anthony Brown,et al.  A Five Country Study of Gender and Sexuality Diversity and Schooling in Southern Africa , 2019 .

[12]  Christian D. Schunn,et al.  Female students with A’s have similar physics self-efficacy as male students with C’s in introductory courses: A cause for alarm? , 2018, Physical Review Physics Education Research.

[13]  Claudio Fazio,et al.  Conceptual Understanding of Newtonian Mechanics Through Cluster Analysis of FCI Student Answers , 2018, International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education.

[14]  Ben Van Dusen,et al.  Comparison of Normalized Gain and Cohen's "d" for Analyzing Gains on Concept Inventories. , 2016, 1612.09180.

[15]  Sarah L. Eddy,et al.  Beneath the numbers: A review of gender disparities in undergraduate education across science, technology, engineering, and math disciplines , 2016 .

[16]  Wade Naylor,et al.  Gender gap and polarisation of physics on global courses , 2016, 1605.03302.

[17]  Gavin W. Fulmer,et al.  Applying a Force and Motion Learning Progression over an Extended Time Span using the Force Concept Inventory , 2014 .

[18]  Wade Naylor,et al.  Polarization of physics on global courses , 2014, 1405.0095.

[19]  Eleanor C. Sayre,et al.  Best Practices for Administering Concept Inventories , 2014, 1404.6500.

[20]  Vincent P. Coletta.  Reducing the FCI Gender Gap , 2014 .

[21]  Gwen C. Marchand,et al.  Stereotype Threat and Women's Performance in Physics , 2013 .

[22]  C. Singh,et al.  Teaching Assistants' Performance at Identifying Common Introductory Student Difficulties in Mechanics Revealed by the Force Concept Inventory. , 2013, 1307.7177.

[23]  Sarah B. McKagan,et al.  Gender gap on concept inventories in physics: what is consistent, what is inconsistent,and what factors influence the gap? , 2013, 1307.0912.

[24]  C. MacPhee,et al.  Gender differences in conceptual understanding of Newtonian mechanics: a UK cross-institution comparison , 2012, 1211.3888.

[25]  Jenessa R. Shapiro,et al.  The Role of Stereotype Threats in Undermining Girls’ and Women’s Performance and Interest in STEM Fields , 2012 .

[26]  Lei Bao,et al.  Analyzing force concept inventory with item response theory , 2010, 1007.5473.

[27]  Teresa Martín-Blas,et al.  Enhancing Force Concept Inventory diagnostics to identify dominant misconceptions in first-year engineering physics , 2010 .

[28]  Ana Susac,et al.  Rasch Model Based Analysis of the Force Concept Inventory. , 2010 .

[29]  S. Bayraktar,et al.  Misconceptions of Turkish Pre-Service Teachers about Force and Motion , 2009 .

[30]  A. Savinainen,et al.  The Force Concept Inventory as a Measure of Students Conceptual Coherence , 2008 .

[31]  Ken Heller,et al.  Does PER-based Instruction Help Underrepresented Groups Succeed, and How Can It Do So Better? Gender Differences in both Force Concept Inventory and Introductory Physics Performance , 2008 .

[32]  H. Glasser,et al.  On the Vague Meaning of “Gender” in Education Research: The Problem, Its Sources, and Recommendations for Practice , 2008 .

[33]  O. Gioka.  Assessment for learning in physics investigations: assessment criteria, questions and feedback in marking , 2006 .

[34]  Stephen D. Baker,et al.  Testing the test: Item response curves and test quality , 2006 .

[35]  E. Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: Results from a Range of Classrooms , 2002 .

[36]  Lei Bao,et al.  Concentration analysis: A quantitative assessment of student states , 2001 .

[37]  R. Hake.  Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses , 1998 .

[38]  David Hestenes,et al.  Who needs physics education research , 1998 .

[39]  P. Black,et al.  Assessment and Classroom Learning , 1998 .

[40]  David Hammer,et al.  More than misconceptions: Multiple perspectives on student knowledge and reasoning, and an appropriate role for education research , 1996 .

[41]  Eric Mazur,et al.  Peer Instruction: A User's Manual , 1996 .

[42]  D. Hestenes,et al.  Force concept inventory , 1992 .

[43]  J. Clement,et al.  Not all preconceptions are misconceptions: finding ‘anchoring conceptions’ for grounding instruction on students’ intuitions , 1989 .

[44]  Ibrahim A. Halloun,et al.  The initial knowledge state of college physics students , 1985 .

[45]  A. Bandura.  Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. , 1977, Psychological review.

[46]  F. Cuevas,et al.  Comparing the acquisition of concepts in Newtonian mechanics for engineering students in different levels courses , 2023, IWOSP 2021, INTERNATIONAL WORKSHOP ON STATISTICAL PHYSICS.

[47]  P. Main.  Assessment in University Physics Education , 2022 .

[48]  M. M. Hull,et al.  Analysis to Develop Computerized Adaptive Testing with the Force Concept Inventory , 2021, Journal of Physics: Conference Series.

[49]  H. Bani-Salameh.  How persistent are the misconceptions about force and motion held by college students? , 2016 .

[50]  H. Bani-Salameh.  Using the method of dominant incorrect answers with the FCI test to diagnose misconceptions held by first year college students , 2016 .

[51]  A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas , 2015 .

[52]  Karen M. Gagne.  University – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – , 2013 .

[53]  Paul Jenkins,et al.  Faculty of Engineering and the Built Environment , 2011 .

[54]  I. Obaidat,et al.  The Grasp of Physics Concepts of Motion: Identifying Particular Patterns in Students' Thinking. , 2009 .

[55]  E. Deci,et al.  Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. , 2000, The American psychologist.

[56]  B. Zimmerman,et al.  Self-Efficacy: An Essential Motive to Learn. , 2000, Contemporary educational psychology.

[57]  P. Elliott.  Assessment Standards for School Mathematics , 1995 .