Degradation, Fatigue, and Failure of Resin Dental Composite Materials

The intent of this article is to review the numerous factors that affect the mechanical properties of particle- or fiber-filler-containing indirect dental resin composite materials. The focus will be on the effects of degradation due to aging in different media, mainly water and water and ethanol, cyclic loading, and mixed-mode loading on flexure strength and fracture toughness. Several selected papers will be examined in detail with respect to mixed and cyclic loading, and 3D tomography with multi-axial compression specimens. The main cause of failure, for most dental resin composites, is the breakdown of the resin matrix and/or the interface between the filler and the resin matrix. In clinical studies, it appears that failure in the first 5 years is a restoration issue (technique or material selection); after that time period, failure most often results from secondary decay.

[1]  G. F. F. G.,et al.  Hertz's Miscellaneous Papers , 1896, Nature.

[2]  H. Awaji,et al.  Combined Mode Fracture Toughness Measurement by the Disk Test , 1978 .

[3]  W H Douglas,et al.  A simple model of crack propagation in dental restorations. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[4]  J. Antonucci,et al.  Indentation modulus and hardness of whisker-reinforced heat-cured dental resin composites. , 2000, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[5]  Crack Propagation Directions in Unfilled Resins , 1998, Journal of dental research.

[6]  R. Hickel,et al.  Two-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry (Print).

[7]  A. Laksimi,et al.  Damage analysis and the fibre–matrix effect in polypropylene reinforced by short glass fibres above glass transition temperature , 2003 .

[8]  Y. Oshida,et al.  Some mechanistic observation on water-deteriorated dental composite resins. , 1995, Bio-medical materials and engineering.

[9]  M. Brackett,et al.  Effect of restoration size on the clinical performance of posterior "packable" resin composites over 18 months. , 2007, Operative dentistry.

[10]  J. Quinn,et al.  Dental resin composites containing silica-fused whiskers--effects of whisker-to-silica ratio on fracture toughness and indentation properties. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[11]  C. Lloyd.  The fracture toughness of dental composites. II. The environmental and temperature dependence of the stress intensification factor (KIC). , 1982, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[12]  J. Ferracane,et al.  In vitro aging of dental composites in water--effect of degree of conversion, filler volume, and filler/matrix coupling. , 1998, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[13]  R. Draughn.  Compressive Fatigue Limits of Composite Restorative Materials , 1979, Journal of dental research.

[14]  A. Ogden.  Degradation of dental polymers , 1987 .

[15]  R. Bryant,et al.  A clinical evaluation of posterior composite resin restorations: 8-year findings. , 1998, Journal of dentistry.

[16]  H. H. Xu,et al.  Long-term Water-aging of Whisker-reinforced Polymer-Matrix Composites , 2003, Journal of dental research.

[17]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Flexural strength and Weibull analysis of a microhybrid and a nanofill composite evaluated by 3- and 4-point bending tests. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[18]  Kyungmin Ham,et al.  The 3D chemical distribution of a flame retardant in a fiberglass-reinforced polymer blend as measured with synchrotron x-ray tomography , 2006, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[19]  H. Xu,et al.  Dental Composite Resins Containing Silica-fused Ceramic Single-crystalline Whiskers with Various Filler Levels , 1999, Journal of dental research.

[20]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Properties of heat-treated composites after aging in water. , 1995, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[21]  J. Ding,et al.  Filler-coupling agent-matrix interactions in silica/polymethylmethacrylate composites. , 2001, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research.

[22]  John William Nicholson,et al.  Adhesive dental materials and their durability , 2000 .

[23]  S. Ebisu,et al.  Fatigue behavior of resin composites in aqueous environments. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[24]  K. Ravi-Chandar,et al.  Confined compression: A stable homogeneous deformation for constitutive characterization , 2000 .

[26]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Strength and fatigue performance versus filler fraction of different types of direct dental restoratives. , 2006, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[27]  P. Vallittu,et al.  Short glass fiber reinforced restorative composite resin with semi-inter penetrating polymer network matrix. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[28]  J L Drummond,et al.  Fracture properties of aged and post-processed dental composites. , 1998, European journal of oral sciences.

[29]  Cyclic fatigue of composite restorative materials. , 1989, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[30]  I. Mjör,et al.  Selection of restorative materials, reasons for replacement, and longevity of restorations in Florida. , 1998, The Journal of the American College of Dentists.

[31]  M. Braem,et al.  Surface contact fatigue and flexural fatigue of dental restorative materials. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[32]  J. Quinn,et al.  Effects of different whiskers on the reinforcement of dental resin composites. , 2003, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[33]  R. Hickel,et al.  Three-year clinical evaluation of direct and indirect composite restorations in posterior teeth. , 1999, The Journal of prosthetic dentistry.

[34]  Wear of dental tissues and restorative materials. , 1979 .

[35]  J L Ferracane,et al.  Post-cure heat treatments for composites: properties and fractography. , 1992, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[36]  C. Domingo,et al.  Dental composites reinforced with hydroxyapatite: mechanical behavior and absorption/elution characteristics. , 2001, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[37]  B. Lawn,et al.  Indentation fracture: principles and applications , 1975 .

[38]  R. Frankenberger,et al.  Evaluation of resin composite materials. Part II: in vivo investigations. , 2005, American journal of dentistry.

[39]  B. Leroux,et al.  Survival and reasons for failure of amalgam versus composite posterior restorations placed in a randomized clinical trial. , 2007, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[40]  M. Goldman.  Fracture properties of composite and glass ionomer dental restorative materials. , 1985, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[41]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Evaluation of Subsurface Defects Created During the Finishing of Composites , 1992, Journal of dental research.

[42]  V. Ravindranath,et al.  Effect of cyclic loading and environmental aging on the fracture toughness of dental resin composite. , 2007, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[43]  R. Pilliar,et al.  Fracture Toughness of Dental Composites Determined Using the Short-rod Fracture Toughness Test , 1986, Journal of dental research.

[44]  Influence of silanization and filler fraction on aged dental composites. , 2008, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[45]  B. Russell,et al.  GRGDSP peptide-bound silicone membranes withstand mechanical flexing in vitro and display enhanced fibroblast adhesion. , 2002, Biomaterials.

[46]  Indentation Cracking of Composite Matrix Materials , 1994, Journal of dental research.

[47]  A. Ulman,et al.  Formation and Structure of Self-Assembled Monolayers. , 1996, Chemical reviews.

[48]  U. Belser,et al.  Fracture toughness of aged dental composites in combined mode I and mode II loading. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[49]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  In vitro flexural fatigue limits of dental composites. , 1994, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[50]  R. Hickel,et al.  Mechanical properties of new composite restorative materials. , 2000, Journal of biomedical materials research.

[51]  W. Sperr,et al.  Longevity of direct resin composite restorations in posterior teeth: a review , 2003, Clinical Oral Investigations.

[52]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Solvent Degradation and Reduced Fracture Toughness in Aged Composites , 1992, Journal of dental research.

[53]  B. J. Super,et al.  Tomography of dental composites , 2006, SPIE Optics + Photonics.

[54]  N. King,et al.  Effect of resin hydrophilicity and water storage on resin strength. , 2004, Biomaterials.

[55]  Y. Shih,et al.  Influence of silanization and filler fraction on aged dental composites. , 2000, Journal of oral rehabilitation.

[56]  W. J. O'brien,et al.  Dental Materials and Their Selection , 2002 .

[57]  L. Mascia,et al.  Probing the molecular interactions in the diffusion of water through epoxy and epoxy–bismaleimide networks , 2002 .

[58]  C. Atkinson,et al.  Combined mode fracture via the cracked Brazilian disk test , 1982, International Journal of Fracture.

[59]  K. Sunnegårdh-Grönberg,et al.  Fiber-reinforced packable resin composites in Class II cavities. , 2006, Journal of dentistry.

[60]  F. Trachtenberg,et al.  The longevity of amalgam versus compomer/composite restorations in posterior primary and permanent teeth: findings From the New England Children's Amalgam Trial. , 2007, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[61]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Variables Affecting the Fracture Toughness of Dental Composites , 1987, Journal of dental research.

[62]  P. Lambrechts,et al.  In vitro fatigue behavior of restorative composites and glass ionomers. , 1995, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[63]  R. Smales,et al.  Clinical evaluation of packable and conventional hybrid posterior resin-based composites: results at 3.5 years. , 2005, Journal of the American Dental Association.

[64]  I. Mjör,et al.  Influence of patient factors on age of restorations at failure and reasons for their placement and replacement. , 2001, Journal of dentistry.

[65]  M. Roberts,et al.  Influence of Water Exposure on the Tensile Strength of Composites , 1990, Journal of dental research.

[66]  J. Antonucci,et al.  Effect of thermal cycling on whisker-reinforced dental resin composites , 2002, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[67]  F. Guiberteau.  Indentation fatigue : a simple cyclic Hertzian test for measuring damage accumulation in polycrystalline ceramics , 1993 .

[68]  J. McKinney,et al.  Relationship Between Subsurface Damage and Wear of Dental Restorative Composites , 1982, Journal of dental research.

[69]  N. Wilson,et al.  Clinical evaluation of a posterior composite 10-year report. , 1999, Journal of dentistry.

[70]  Francesco De Carlo,et al.  Three-dimensional tomography of composite fracture surfaces. , 2005, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[71]  C. Liu,et al.  A Brazilian disk for measuring fracture toughness of orthotropic materials , 1996 .

[72]  W. Wu,et al.  Materials Science Subsurface Damage Layer of in vivo Worn Dental Composite Restorations , 1984, Journal of dental research.

[73]  R. Lakes,et al.  Fatigue of packable dental composites. , 2007, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[74]  J. Drummond,et al.  Effects of aging and cyclic loading on the mechanical properties of glass ionomer cements. , 2002, European journal of oral sciences.

[75]  J K Harcourt,et al.  Fracture toughness of water-aged resin composite restorative materials. , 1995, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[76]  H. Fong,et al.  Fabrication and evaluation of Bis-GMA/TEGDMA dental resins/composites containing nano fibrillar silicate. , 2008, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[77]  J L Ferracane,et al.  In vitro Wear of Composite with Varied Cure, Filler Level, and Filler Treatment , 1997, Journal of dental research.

[78]  J. McCool,et al.  Interface effects on mechanical properties of particle-reinforced composites. , 2004, Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials.

[79]  H. Saunders,et al.  Advanced Fracture Mechanics , 1985 .

[80]  V. Tikare,et al.  Combined Mode I and Mode II Fracture of Monolithic Ceramics , 1993 .

[81]  J. Ferracane.  Current trends in dental composites. , 1995, Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists.

[82]  A. R. Rosenfield,et al.  Mixed-Mode Fracture of Ceramics in Diametral Compression , 1986 .

[83]  M. K. Gordon,et al.  Prevalence of cusp fractures in teeth restored with amalgam and with resin-based composite. , 2004, The Journal of the American Dental Association (1939).

[84]  J. Quinn,et al.  Wear and Mechanical Properties of Nano-silica-fused Whisker Composites , 2004, Journal of dental research.

[85]  Marcus Textor,et al.  Covalent Attachment of Cell-Adhesive, (Arg-Gly-Asp)-Containing Peptides to Titanium Surfaces , 1998 .

[86]  J. Ferracane,et al.  Fracture Toughness of Experimental Dental Composites Aged in Ethanol , 1995, Journal of dental research.

[87]  R. Hickel,et al.  Longevity of restorations in posterior teeth and reasons for failure. , 2001, The journal of adhesive dentistry.

[88]  H. H. Xu,et al.  Whisker-reinforced Heat-cured Dental Resin Composites: Effects of Filler Level and Heat-cure Temperature and Time , 2000, Journal of dental research.

[89]  F. Demarco,et al.  A clinical evaluation of posterior composite restorations: 17-year findings. , 2006, Journal of dentistry.