A View on Despeckling in Ultrasound Imaging

Ultrasound imaging is a widely used and safe medical diagnostic technique, due to its noninvasive nature, low cost and capability of forming real time imaging. However the usefulness of ultrasound imaging is degraded by the presence of signal dependant noise known as speckle. The speckle pattern depends on the structure of the image tissue and various imaging parameters. There are two main purposes for speckle reduction in medical ultrasound imaging (1) to improve the human interpretation of ultrasound images (2) despeckling is the preprocessing step for many ultrasound image processing tasks such as segmentation and registration. A number of methods have been proposed for speckle reduction in ultrasound imaging. While incorporating speckle reduction techniques as an aid for visual diagnosis, it has to keep in mind that certain speckle contains diagnostic information and should be retained. The objective of this paper is to give an overview about types of speckle reduction techniques in ultrasound imaging 1. Importance of ultrasound Imaging ULTRASOUND imaging application in medicine and other fields is enormous. It has several advantages over other medical imaging modalities. The use of ultrasound in diagnosis is well established because of its noninvasive nature, low cost, capability of forming real time imaging and continuing improvement in image quality. It is estimated that one out of every four medical diagnostic image studies in the world involves ultrasonic techniques. US waves are characterized by frequency above 20 KHz which is the upper limit of human hearing. In medical US applications, frequencies are used between 500 KHz and 30 MHz B-mode imaging is the most used modality in medical US. An US transducer which is placed onto the patient's skin over the imaged region sends an US pulse which travels along a beam into the tissue. Due to interfaces some of the US energy is reflected back to the transducer which converts it into echo signals. These signals are then sent into amplifiers and signal processing circuits in the imaging machine's hardware to form a 2-D image. This process of sending pulses launched in different directions is repeated in order to examine the whole region in the body. Thus, US imaging involves signals which are obtained by coherent summation of echo signals from scatterers in the tissue. In many cases volume quantification is important in assessing the progression of diseases and tracking progression of response to treatment. Thus, 3D ultrasound imaging has drawn great attention in recent years. 2. Ultrasound Imaging System

[1]  Chung-Ming Chen,et al.  Adaptive ultrasonic speckle reduction based on the slope-facet model. , 2003, Ultrasound in medicine & biology.

[2]  Aleksandra Pizurica,et al.  A versatile wavelet domain noise filtration technique for medical imaging , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[3]  J. Greenleaf,et al.  Ultrasound echo envelope analysis using a homodyned K distribution signal model. , 1994, Ultrasonic imaging.

[4]  Corina da Costa Freitas,et al.  A model for extremely heterogeneous clutter , 1997, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[5]  Carl-Fredrik Westin,et al.  Oriented Speckle Reducing Anisotropic Diffusion , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[6]  Michael F. Insana,et al.  Analysis of ultrasound image texture via generalized rician statistics , 1986 .

[7]  S. D. Silverstein,et al.  Optimum displacement for compound image generation in medical ultrasound , 1988, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[8]  Douglas L. Jones,et al.  Detection of lines and boundaries in speckle images-application to medical ultrasound , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[9]  Victor S. Frost,et al.  A Model for Radar Images and Its Application to Adaptive Digital Filtering of Multiplicative Noise , 1982, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Yasser M. Kadah,et al.  Real-time speckle reduction and coherence enhancement in ultrasound imaging via nonlinear anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[11]  E. Jakeman,et al.  Generalized K distribution: a statistical model for weak scattering , 1987 .

[12]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  Multi-Scale Nonlinear Thresholding for Ultrasonic Speckle Suppression , 1999, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[13]  Scott T. Acton,et al.  Speckle reducing anisotropic diffusion , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[14]  Andrew F. Laine,et al.  Speckle reduction and contrast enhancement of echocardiograms via multiscale nonlinear processing , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[15]  T. Loupas,et al.  An adaptive weighted median filter for speckle suppression in medical ultrasonic images , 1989 .

[16]  Luciano Alparone,et al.  Multiresolution local-statistics speckle filtering based on a ratio Laplacian pyramid , 1998, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[17]  Pai-Chi Li,et al.  Strain compounding: a new approach for speckle reduction , 2002, IEEE Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control.

[18]  G E Trahey,et al.  A Quantitative Approach to Speckle Reduction via Frequency Compounding , 1986, Ultrasonic imaging.

[19]  Song B. Park,et al.  Speckle Reduction with Edge Preservation in Medical Ultrasonic Images Using a Homogeneous Region Growing Mean Filter (HRGMF) , 1991, Ultrasonic imaging.

[20]  Alin Achim,et al.  Novel Bayesian multiscale method for speckle removal in medical ultrasound images , 2001, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  Sankar K. Pal,et al.  International Journal of Signal Processing , Image Processing and Pattern Recognition , 2008 .

[22]  Alexander A. Sawchuk,et al.  Adaptive restoration of images with speckle , 1987, IEEE Trans. Acoust. Speech Signal Process..

[23]  Santiago Aja-Fernández,et al.  On the estimation of the coefficient of variation for anisotropic diffusion speckle filtering , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[24]  Fawwaz T. Ulaby,et al.  SAR speckle reduction using wavelet denoising and Markov random field modeling , 2002, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote. Sens..

[25]  Xiaorong Gao,et al.  A novel multiscale nonlinear thresholding method for ultrasonic speckle suppressing , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[26]  Pai-Chi Li,et al.  Strain compounding: a new approach for speckle reduction. , 2002, IEEE transactions on ultrasonics, ferroelectrics, and frequency control.

[27]  Jitendra Malik,et al.  Scale-Space and Edge Detection Using Anisotropic Diffusion , 1990, IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell..

[28]  R. F. Wagner,et al.  Statistics of Speckle in Ultrasound B-Scans , 1983, IEEE Transactions on Sonics and Ultrasonics.

[29]  Gozde Bozdagi Akar,et al.  An adaptive speckle suppression filter for medical ultrasonic imaging , 1995, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[30]  J C Bamber,et al.  Adaptive filtering for reduction of speckle in ultrasonic pulse-echo images. , 1986, Ultrasonics.

[31]  Fan Zhang,et al.  Nonlinear Diffusion in Laplacian Pyramid Domain for Ultrasonic Speckle Reduction , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  M. N. Shanmukha Swamy,et al.  Despeckling of medical ultrasound images using data and rate adaptive lossy compression , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[33]  James F. Greenleaf,et al.  Adaptive speckle reduction filter for log-compressed B-scan images , 1996, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.