Linear and nonlinear spectral integration in type IV neurons of the dorsal cochlear nucleus. I. Regions of linear interaction.

The principal neurons of the dorsal cochlear nucleus have complex response properties, many of which are classified as type IV. These units integrate energy in the acoustic signal in a nonlinear fashion; for example, at high sound levels the response to a noise of narrow bandwidth and to a band-reject filtered noise with a spectral notch of the same bandwidth may both be inhibitory. However, the sum of these two stimuli, which is broadband noise (BBN), generally gives an excitatory response. In other situations, linear interactions among stimulus components are observed. In this paper, three regimes of approximate linearity were identified. First, best-frequency (BF) tones and equal-energy narrow noisebands centered at BF evoke almost the same response, which is consistent with a stage of linear filtering followed by a nonlinearity that generates the rate responses of the neuron. Second, for sounds close to threshold (10-15 dB re threshold), energy over the full bandwidth of the unit is integrated linearly. Within this regime, responses to the narrow noiseband and the spectral notch mentioned above do sum to equal the response to BBN. Finally, two noisebands centered at different frequencies, such that their sum is a notch in a broad band of noise, sum linearly at low sound levels; the degree of linearity improves as the separation between the noisebands increases. The results are interpreted in terms of a model of type IV response generation containing two inhibitory interneurons: type II units, which are active for narrowband stimuli, including tones, and the wideband inhibitor, which is active for broadband stimuli. In most cases, the onset of nonlinearity occurs for stimuli that significantly activate the type II inhibitory interneuron.

[1]  Herbert Voigt,et al.  The Internal Organization of the Dorsal Cochlear Nucleus , 1981 .

[2]  E D Young,et al.  Linear and nonlinear spectral integration in type IV neurons of the dorsal cochlear nucleus. II. Predicting responses with the use of nonlinear models. , 1997, Journal of neurophysiology.

[3]  Eric D. Young,et al.  Identification of response properties of ascending axons from dorsal cochlear nucleus , 1980, Brain Research.

[4]  Eric D. Young,et al.  Response properties of type II and type III units in dorsal cochlear nucleus , 1982, Hearing Research.

[5]  K. Osen Course and termination of the primary afferents in the cochlear nuclei of the cat. An experimental anatomical study. , 1970, Archives italiennes de biologie.

[6]  E D Young,et al.  Organization of dorsal cochlear nucleus type IV unit response maps and their relationship to activation by bandlimited noise. , 1991, Journal of neurophysiology.

[7]  E. Young,et al.  Auditory-nerve encoding of pinna-based spectral cues: rate representation of high-frequency stimuli. , 1995, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  W. S. Rhode,et al.  Structural and functional properties distinguish two types of multipolar cells in the ventral cochlear nucleus , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[9]  A R Palmer,et al.  Level dependence of cochlear nucleus onset unit responses and facilitation by second tones or broadband noise. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[10]  G. Spirou,et al.  Frequency organization of the dorsal cochlear nucleus in cats , 1993, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[11]  R. Gacek,et al.  The Primary Acoustic Nuclei , 1983 .

[12]  M. Sachs,et al.  Two-tone inhibition in auditory-nerve fibers. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  M. Reed,et al.  A computational model for signal processing by the dorsal cochlear nucleus. I. Responses to pure tones. , 1995, Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  J O Pickles,et al.  Auditory-nerve-fiber bandwidths and critical bandwidths in the cat. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  D. H. Marshall,et al.  Responses of ventral cochlear nucleus onset and chopper units as a function of signal bandwidth. , 1996, Journal of neurophysiology.

[16]  E. Young,et al.  Responses to tones and noise of single cells in dorsal cochlear nucleus of unanesthetized cats. , 1976, Journal of neurophysiology.

[17]  H. Voigt,et al.  Evidence of inhibitory interactions between neurons in dorsal cochlear nucleus. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Raphael Lorente De No,et al.  The Primary Acoustic Nuclei , 1981 .

[19]  D. Oertel,et al.  Morphology and physiology of cells in slice preparations of the dorsal cochlear nucleus of mice , 1989, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[20]  J. L. Goldstein,et al.  Neural correlates of the aural combination tone 2f 1 - f 2 , 1968 .

[21]  I. Nelken,et al.  Two separate inhibitory mechanisms shape the responses of dorsal cochlear nucleus type IV units to narrowband and wideband stimuli. , 1994, Journal of neurophysiology.

[22]  H. Voigt,et al.  Cross-correlation analysis of inhibitory interactions in dorsal cochlear nucleus. , 1990, Journal of neurophysiology.