Is Reflex Germline BRCA1/2 Testing Necessary in Women Diagnosed with Non-Mucinous High-Grade Epithelial Ovarian Cancer Aged 80 Years or Older?

Simple Summary Approximately 15% of patients diagnosed with high-grade non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) have a germline BRCA1/2 mutation, although all patients are often able to access germline testing. Importantly, the risk of familial ovarian cancer reduces with advancing age at diagnosis. The aim of our study was to determine the prevalence of germline and somatic BRCA1/2 mutations in women diagnosed with non-mucinous high-grade EOC aged ≥80. We found that somatic BRCA1/2 mutations occurred nine times more frequently than germline BRCA1/2 mutations in women aged ≥80. The only germline BRCA1/2 mutation reported in a patient aged ≥80 was detected in both germline and tumour DNA. These data suggest that germline BRCA1/2 testing in women diagnosed with high-grade non-mucinous EOC aged ≥80 can be reserved for those with a detectable tumour BRCA1/2 mutation. Abstract Women diagnosed with non-mucinous high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) in England are often reflex-tested for germline and tumour BRCA1/2 variants. The value of germline BRCA1/2 testing in women diagnosed aged ≥80 is questionable. We performed an observational study of all women diagnosed with non-mucinous high-grade EOC who underwent germline and tumour BRCA1/2 testing by the North West of England Genomic Laboratory Hub. A subgroup of women also underwent germline testing using a panel of homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes and/or tumour testing for homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) using Myriad’s myChoice® companion diagnostic. Seven-hundred-two patients successfully underwent both germline and tumour BRCA1/2 testing. Of these, 48 were diagnosed with non-mucinous high-grade EOC aged ≥80. In this age group, somatic BRCA1/2 pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants (PV/LPVs) were detected nine times more often than germline BRCA1/2 PV/LPVs. The only germline PV reported in a patient aged ≥80 was detected in germline and tumour DNA (BRCA2 c.4478_4481del). No patient aged ≥80 had a germline PV/LPVs in a non-BRCA1/2 HRR gene. Thirty-eight percent of patients aged ≥80 had a tumour positive for HRD. Our data suggest that tumour BRCA1/2 and HRD testing is adequate for patients diagnosed with non-mucinous high-grade EOC aged ≥80, with germline BRCA1/2 testing reserved for women with a tumour BRCA1/2 PV/LPVs.

[1]  Yoonjung Kim,et al.  Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Germline and Somatic BRCA Testing in Patients With Advanced Ovarian Cancer , 2022, Annals of laboratory medicine.

[2]  A. Oza,et al.  Ad hoc Analysis of the Phase III ENGOT-OV16/NOVA Study: Niraparib Efficacy in Germline BRCA Wild-type Recurrent Ovarian Cancer with Homologous Recombination Repair Defects , 2022, Cancer research communications.

[3]  J. Ledermann,et al.  Risk reduction and screening of cancer in hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndromes: ESMO Clinical Practice Guideline. , 2022, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[4]  A. Oza,et al.  Clinical and molecular characteristics of ARIEL3 patients who derived exceptional benefit from rucaparib maintenance treatment for high-grade ovarian carcinoma. , 2022, Gynecologic oncology.

[5]  B. Monk,et al.  A Randomized, Phase III Trial to Evaluate Rucaparib Monotherapy as Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer (ATHENA–MONO/GOG-3020/ENGOT-ov45) , 2022, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[6]  G. Jayson,et al.  BRCA1/2 in non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer: tumour with or without germline testing? , 2022, British Journal of Cancer.

[7]  A. Tinker,et al.  Germline Testing and Somatic Tumor Testing for BRCA1/2 Pathogenic Variants in Ovarian Cancer: What Is the Optimal Sequence of Testing? , 2021, JCO precision oncology.

[8]  A. Mullard,et al.  The detection of germline and somatic BRCA1/2 genetic variants through parallel testing of patients with high‐grade serous ovarian cancer: a national retrospective audit , 2021, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[9]  Vera M Witjes,et al.  Probability of detecting germline BRCA1/2 pathogenic variants in histological subtypes of ovarian carcinoma. A meta-analysis. , 2021, Gynecologic oncology.

[10]  A. Tinker,et al.  Characterization of patients with long-term responses to rucaparib treatment in recurrent ovarian cancer. , 2021, Gynecologic oncology.

[11]  D. Berton,et al.  Homologous recombination repair mutation gene panels (excluding BRCA) are not predictive of maintenance olaparib plus bevacizumab efficacy in the first-line PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial , 2021, Gynecologic Oncology.

[12]  A. Tinker,et al.  Molecular and clinical determinants of response and resistance to rucaparib for recurrent ovarian cancer treatment in ARIEL2 (Parts 1 and 2) , 2021, Nature Communications.

[13]  B. Karlan,et al.  Genetic/Familial High-Risk Assessment: Breast, Ovarian, and Pancreatic, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. , 2021, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[14]  S. Ellard,et al.  Combining evidence for and against pathogenicity for variants in cancer susceptibility genes: CanVIG-UK consensus recommendations , 2020, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[15]  G. Jayson,et al.  Mainstreaming germline BRCA1/2 testing in non-mucinous epithelial ovarian cancer in the North West of England , 2020, European Journal of Human Genetics.

[16]  I. Campbell,et al.  Exome sequencing of familial high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma reveals heterogeneity for rare candidate susceptibility genes , 2020, Nature Communications.

[17]  N. Rahman,et al.  Oncologist-led BRCA ‘mainstreaming’ in the ovarian cancer clinic: A study of 255 patients and its impact on their management , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[18]  F. Marmé,et al.  Olaparib plus Bevacizumab as First-Line Maintenance in Ovarian Cancer. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[19]  M. Morgan,et al.  Veliparib with First-Line Chemotherapy and as Maintenance Therapy in Ovarian Cancer. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[20]  B. Monk,et al.  Niraparib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Advanced Ovarian Cancer. , 2019, The New England journal of medicine.

[21]  A. Tutt,et al.  A decade of clinical development of PARP inhibitors in perspective , 2019, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[22]  B. Taylor,et al.  Germline-focussed analysis of tumour-only sequencing: recommendations from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working Group , 2019, Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology.

[23]  A. Reuss,et al.  Deleterious somatic variants in 473 consecutive individuals with ovarian cancer: results of the observational AGO-TR1 study (NCT02222883) , 2019, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[24]  Angela Mariotto,et al.  Genetic Testing and Results in a Population-Based Cohort of Breast Cancer Patients and Ovarian Cancer Patients. , 2019, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[25]  G. Jayson,et al.  Prevalence of germline pathogenic BRCA1/2 variants in sequential epithelial ovarian cancer cases , 2019, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[26]  R. Glasspool,et al.  Routine germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing in patients with ovarian carcinoma: analysis of the Scottish real‐life experience , 2018, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[27]  C. Turnbull,et al.  Consensus for genes to be included on cancer panel tests offered by UK genetics services: guidelines of the UK Cancer Genetics Group , 2018, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[28]  J. Ledermann,et al.  Mainstreamed genetic testing for women with ovarian cancer: first-year experience , 2018, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[29]  Rochelle L. Garcia,et al.  Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with BRCA1 or RAD51C methylated versus mutated ovarian carcinoma. , 2017, Gynecologic oncology.

[30]  B. Gilks,et al.  Candidate biomarkers of PARP inhibitor sensitivity in ovarian cancer beyond the BRCA genes , 2015, British Journal of Cancer.

[31]  T. Walsh,et al.  Mutations in Homologous Recombination Genes and Outcomes in Ovarian Carcinoma Patients in GOG 218: An NRG Oncology/Gynecologic Oncology Group Study , 2017, Clinical Cancer Research.

[32]  F. Couch,et al.  Frequency of mutations in a large series of clinically ascertained ovarian cancer cases tested on multi-gene panels compared to reference controls. , 2017, Gynecologic oncology.

[33]  James X. Sun,et al.  Rucaparib maintenance treatment for recurrent ovarian carcinoma after response to platinum therapy (ARIEL3): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial , 2017, The Lancet.

[34]  Ignace Vergote,et al.  Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. , 2016, The New England journal of medicine.

[35]  Suzanne Miller,et al.  New paradigms for BRCA1/BRCA2 testing in women with ovarian cancer: results of the Genetic Testing in Epithelial Ovarian Cancer (GTEOC) study , 2016, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[36]  S. Seal,et al.  Implementing rapid, robust, cost-effective, patient-centred, routine genetic testing in ovarian cancer patients , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[37]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) Score Predicts Response to Platinum-Containing Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Triple-Negative Breast Cancer , 2016, Clinical Cancer Research.

[38]  Lara E Sucheston-Campbell,et al.  Germline Mutations in the BRIP1, BARD1, PALB2, and NBN Genes in Women With Ovarian Cancer. , 2015, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.

[39]  Lara E Sucheston-Campbell,et al.  Contribution of Germline Mutations in the RAD51B, RAD51C, and RAD51D Genes to Ovarian Cancer in the Population. , 2015, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[40]  T. Chan,et al.  The importance of analysis of long-range rearrangement of BRCA1 and BRCA2 in genetic diagnosis of familial breast cancer. , 2015, Cancer genetics.

[41]  Shuwen Huang,et al.  A reliable method for the detection of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in fixed tumour tissue utilising multiplex PCR-based targeted next generation sequencing , 2015, BMC Clinical Pathology.

[42]  Wei-Ting Hwang,et al.  Effects of BRCA1- and BRCA2-Related Mutations on Ovarian and Breast Cancer Survival: A Meta-analysis , 2014, Clinical Cancer Research.

[43]  D. Matei,et al.  Olaparib maintenance therapy in patients with platinum-sensitive relapsed serous ovarian cancer: a preplanned retrospective analysis of outcomes by BRCA status in a randomised phase 2 trial. , 2014, The Lancet. Oncology.

[44]  Jaime Prat,et al.  Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum , 2014, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[45]  Figo Guidelines Staging classification for cancer of the ovary, fallopian tube, and peritoneum☆ , 2013 .

[46]  A. Vincent-Salomon,et al.  Ploidy and large-scale genomic instability consistently identify basal-like breast carcinomas with BRCA1/2 inactivation. , 2012, Cancer research.

[47]  G. Mills,et al.  Patterns of genomic loss of heterozygosity predict homologous recombination repair defects in epithelial ovarian cancer , 2012, British Journal of Cancer.

[48]  J. George,et al.  BRCA mutation frequency and patterns of treatment response in BRCA mutation-positive women with ovarian cancer: a report from the Australian Ovarian Cancer Study Group. , 2012, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[49]  Z. Szallasi,et al.  Telomeric allelic imbalance indicates defective DNA repair and sensitivity to DNA-damaging agents. , 2012, Cancer discovery.

[50]  A. Gylfason,et al.  Mutations in BRIP1 confer high risk of ovarian cancer , 2011, Nature Genetics.

[51]  H. Mackay,et al.  Olaparib in patients with recurrent high-grade serous or poorly differentiated ovarian carcinoma or triple-negative breast cancer: a phase 2, multicentre, open-label, non-randomised study. , 2011, The Lancet. Oncology.

[52]  Benjamin J. Raphael,et al.  Integrated Genomic Analyses of Ovarian Carcinoma , 2011, Nature.

[53]  A. Falini,et al.  Tumours , 2008, Neurological Sciences.

[54]  R. Eeles,et al.  "BRCAness" syndrome in ovarian cancer: a case-control study describing the clinical features and outcome of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations. , 2008, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[55]  D. Easton,et al.  The BOADICEA model of genetic susceptibility to breast and ovarian cancer , 2004, British Journal of Cancer.

[56]  N. Rahman,et al.  A new scoring system for the chances of identifying a BRCA1/2 mutation outperforms existing models including BRCAPRO , 2004, Journal of Medical Genetics.

[57]  Samantha Sharpe,et al.  Cancer Research UK , 2002, Nature Cell Biology.

[58]  D. Berry,et al.  Determining carrier probabilities for breast cancer-susceptibility genes BRCA1 and BRCA2. , 1998, American journal of human genetics.