Individual-Level Factors and Organizational Performance in Government Organizations

In this journal, Rainey and Steinbauer proposed a theory of effective government organizations, and Brewer and Selden conducted an empirical study with data from the 1996 Merit Principles Survey that confirmed most hypothesized relationships in the theoretical model of organizational performance. Following these studies, this study focuses only on the individual-level factors, such as job satisfaction, affective commitment, public service motivation, and organizational citizenship behavior. It empirically tests the effects of these variables on organizational performance in the public sector of Korea. When the survey data of 1,739 public employees in government agencies were analyzed, the hypothesized relationships in the proposed model were confirmed. I discuss the survey results in light of previous studies, especially those of Brewer and Selden. In this journal, Rainey and Steinbauer (1999) proposed a theory of effective government organizations, urging that this theory be tested empirically; Brewer and Selden (2000) conducted an empirical study with data from the 1996 Merit Principles Survey and confirmed most hypothesized relationships in the theoretical model of organizational performance. In those studies, both individual-level and organization-level factors are involved in the theoretical models; thus each level was not fully examined, and some important factors remain to be considered. Brewer and Selden (2000) inspire me to pursue further evidence about whether the individual attitudes and behaviors of public employees may affect government performance. Popovich defined high-performance organizations as "groups of employees who produce desired goods or services at higher quality with the same or fewer resources" (1998, 11). Good public employees may be imagined to have such characteristics as high satisfaction with their jobs, high commitment to the organization, high motivation to serve the public, and strong intentions to work for the organization willingly and devotedly. I assume that public employees with these characteristics will contribute to organizational performance and thus that individual-level factors will positively affect organizational performance. I will discuss the individual-level factors and develop the model that relates I would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for the useful suggestions and comments provided through the review process. Address correspondence to the author at smook@snut.ac.kr. doi:l 0.1 093/jopart/mui013 Advance Access publication on December 16, 2004 Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Vol. 15, no. 2 ? 2005 Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, Inc.; all rights reserved. This content downloaded from 157.55.39.186 on Sun, 09 Oct 2016 04:20:00 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 246 Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Figure 1 Theoretical Model of Individual-Level Factors and Organizational Performance

[1]  J. Bloodgood,et al.  Citizenship Behavior and The Creation of Social Capital in Organizations , 2002 .

[2]  L. Porter,et al.  The Measurement of Organizational Commitment. , 1979 .

[3]  John P. Meyer,et al.  A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment , 1991 .

[4]  B. Wechsler,et al.  Organizational Commitment: Antecedents and Outcomes in Public Organizations , 1996 .

[5]  M. Fottler,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the hospital industry: an exploratory comparison of objective and subjective methods , 2001, Health services management research.

[6]  J. D. Jobson,et al.  Constituent Views of Organizational Effectiveness: Evidence from Police Organizations , 1982 .

[7]  Marc J. Dollinger,et al.  Interorganizational and Collective Strategies in Small Firms: Environmental Effects and Performance , 1992 .

[8]  Barbara S. Romzek Personal Consequences Of Employee Commitment , 1989 .

[9]  Ronald C. Nyhan,et al.  Dimensions of Organizational Commitment in the Public Sector: An Empirical Assessment , 1994 .

[10]  Barbara S. Romzek Employee Investment and Commitment: The Ties That Bind , 1990 .

[11]  P. E. Crewson,et al.  Public-Service Motivation: Building Empirical Evidence of Incidence and Effect , 1997 .

[12]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR ON ORGANIZATIONAL PERFORMANCE: A REVIEW AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FUTURE RESEARCH , 1997 .

[13]  B. Wechsler,et al.  Organizational Commitment: A Reconceptualization And Empirical Test Of Public-Private Differences , 1990 .

[14]  John D. Dilulio Principled Agents: The Cultural Bases of Behavior in a Federal Government Bureaucracy , 1994 .

[15]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment to organizations and occupations , 1993 .

[16]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Commitment to organizations and occupations: Extension and test of a three-component conceptualization. , 1993 .

[17]  N. Venkatraman,et al.  Measurement of Business Economic Performance: An Examination of Method Convergence , 1987 .

[18]  Robert Carton,et al.  Measuring organizational performance , 2006 .

[19]  Dennis Wittmer Serving the People or Serving for Pay: Reward Preferences among Government, Hybrid Sector, and Business Managers , 1991 .

[20]  Gene A. Brewer,et al.  Why Elephants Gallop: Assessing and Predicting Organizational Performance in Federal Agencies , 2000 .

[21]  H. Rainey,et al.  Galloping Elephants: Developing Elements of a Theory of Effective Government Organizations , 1999 .

[22]  Herman L. Boschken Analyzing Performance Skewness in Public Agencies: The Case of Urban Mass Transit , 1992 .

[23]  J. Perry,et al.  An empirical assessment of organizational commitment and organizational effectiveness. , 1981 .

[24]  Cheri Ostroff The relationship between satisfaction, attitudes, and performance: An organizational level analysis. , 1992 .

[25]  J. P. Near,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL CITIZENSHIP BEHAVIOR: ITS NATURE AND ANTECEDENTS , 1983 .

[26]  Daniel P. Forbes Measuring the Unmeasurable: Empirical Studies of Nonprofit Organization Effectiveness from 1977 to 1997 , 1998 .

[27]  Peter J. Robertson,et al.  The Role of Commitment in Collective Action: Comparing the Organizational Behavior and Rational Choice Perspectives , 1995 .

[28]  Gene A. Brewer,et al.  Individual Conceptions of Public Service Motivation , 2000 .

[29]  Warren C. K. Chiu,et al.  Women‐friendly HRM and organizational commitment: A study among women and men of organizations in Hong Kong , 1999 .

[30]  Jennifer A. Chatman,et al.  Organizational commitment and psychological attachment: The effects of compliance, identification, and internalization on prosocial behavior. , 1986 .

[31]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  The human equation : building profits by putting people first , 1998 .

[32]  D. A. Yousef Satisfaction with job security as a predictor of organizational commitment and job performance in a multicultural environment , 1998 .

[33]  Patrick J. Wolf Why Must We Reinvent the Federal Government? Putting Historical Developmental Claims to the Test , 1997 .

[34]  Mark A. Huselid,et al.  The Impact of Human Resource Management Practices on Perceptions of Organizational Performance , 1996 .

[35]  Michelle T. Iaffaldano,et al.  Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. , 1985 .

[36]  James L. Perry,et al.  The Motivational Bases of Public Service , 1990 .

[37]  S. Wayne,et al.  Commitment and employee behavior: comparison of affective commitment and continuance commitment with perceived organizational support. , 1993, The Journal of applied psychology.

[38]  John K. Crum,et al.  Working for America , 1999 .

[39]  Mark John Somers,et al.  Exploring the Relationship between Commitment Profiles and Work Attitudes, Employee Withdrawal, and Job Performance , 2000 .

[40]  Sharon K. Parker,et al.  Job Satisfaction: A Cross-Cultural Review , 2001 .

[41]  Richard M. Steers,et al.  Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, and turnover among psychiatric technicians. , 1974 .

[42]  David J. Houston,et al.  Public-Service Motivation: A Multivariate Test , 2000 .

[43]  K. Cameron Effectiveness as Paradox: Consensus and Conflict in Conceptions of Organizational Effectiveness , 1986 .

[44]  James L. Perry,et al.  Measuring Public Service Motivation: An Assessment of Construct Reliability and Validity , 1996 .

[45]  D. Organ Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome. , 1988 .

[46]  H. Schmid Relationships between Organizational Properties and Organizational Effectiveness in Three Types of Nonprofit Human Service Organizations , 2002 .

[47]  Gregory G. Dess,et al.  Measuring organizational performance in the absence of objective measures: The case of the privately-held firm and conglomerate business unit , 1984 .

[48]  Erik W. Larson,et al.  Relationships Between Worker Behavior and Commitment to the Organization and Union. , 1984 .

[49]  Harold L. Angle,et al.  Organizational Commitment and Employees' Performance Ratings: Both Type of Commitment and Type of Performance Count , 1994 .

[50]  Marilyn M. Helms,et al.  Employee Perceptions of The Relationship Between Strategy, Rewards, and Organizational Performance , 2002, Journal of Business Strategies.

[51]  Stuart Jay Deutsch,et al.  Organizational Effectiveness: A Multiple-Constituency Approach , 1980 .

[52]  John P. Meyer,et al.  The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance and normative commitment to the organization , 1990 .

[53]  T. Judge,et al.  The job satisfaction-job performance relationship: a qualitative and quantitative review. , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[54]  E. Mason,et al.  Gender differences in job satisfaction. , 1995, The Journal of social psychology.

[55]  R. Dubin,et al.  Unit Performance, Situational Factors and Employee Attitudes in Spatially Separated Work Units. , 1974 .

[56]  John P. Meyer,et al.  Testing the "Side-Bet Theory" of Organizational Commitment: Some Methodological Considerations , 1984 .

[57]  H. Rainey,et al.  Reward Preferences among Public and Private Managers: In Search of the Service Ethic , 1982 .

[58]  Chor-fai Au,et al.  Rethinking Organizational Effectiveness , 1996 .

[59]  T. C. Powell Organizational alignment as competitive advantage , 1992 .

[60]  J. Pfeffer,et al.  Putting people first for organizational success , 1999 .

[61]  Daniel J. Koys The Effects of Employee Satisfaction, Organizational Citizenship Behavior, and Turnover on Organizational Effectiveness , 2001 .

[62]  Gregory B. Lewis,et al.  Public Service Motivation and Job Performance , 2001 .

[63]  Douglas N. Jackson,et al.  Organizational commitment and job performance: It's the nature of the commitment that counts. , 1989 .