Motion patterns in activities of daily living: 3- year longitudinal follow-up after total shoulder arthroplasty using an optical 3D motion analysis system

BackgroundTotal shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) can improve function in osteoarthritic shoulders, but the ability to perform activities of daily living (ADLs) can still remain impaired. Routinely, shoulder surgeons measure range of motion (ROM) using a goniometer. Objective data are limited, however, concerning functional three-dimensional changes in ROM in ADLs after TSA in patients with degenerative glenohumeral osteoarthritis.MethodsThis study included ten consecutive patients, who received TSA for primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. The patients were examined the day before, 6 months, and 3 years after shoulder replacement as well. We compared them with a control group (n = 10) without any shoulder pathology and measured shoulder movement by 3D motion analysis using a novel 3 D model. The measurement included static maximum values, the ability to perform and the ROM of the ADLs “combing the hair”, “washing the opposite armpit”, “tying an apron”, and “taking a book from a shelf”.ResultsSix months after surgery, almost all TSA patients were able to perform the four ADLs (3 out of 40 tasks could not be performed by the 10 patients); 3 years postoperatively all patients were able to carry out all ADLs (40 out of 40 tasks possible). In performing the ADLs, comparison of the pre- with the 6-month and 3-year postoperative status of the TSA group showed that the subjects did not fully use the available maximum flexion/extension ROM in performing the four ADLs. The ROM used for flexion/extension did not change significantly (preoperatively 135°-0° -34° vs. 3 years postoperatively 131° -0° -53°). For abduction/adduction, ROM improved significantly from 33°-0° -27° preoperatively to 76° -0° -35° postoperatively. Compared to the controls (118°) the TSA group used less ROM for abduction to perform the four ADLs 3 years postoperatively.ConclusionTSA improves the ability to perform ADL and the individual ROM in ADLs in patients with degenerative glenohumeral osteoarthritis over the course of 3 years. However, TSA patients do not use their maximum available abduction ROM in performing ADLs. This is not related to limitations in active ROM, but rather may be caused by pathologic motion patterns, impaired proprioception or both.

[1]  P. Rozing,et al.  Indications, complications, and results of shoulder arthroplasty , 2006, Scandinavian journal of rheumatology.

[2]  C. Neer Articular replacement for the humeral head. , 1955, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[3]  M. Kolber,et al.  Reliability and minimal detectable change of inclinometric shoulder mobility measurements , 2009, Physiotherapy theory and practice.

[4]  A. Armstrong,et al.  Reliability of range-of-motion measurement in the elbow and forearm. , 1998, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[5]  C. Constant,et al.  A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. , 1987, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[6]  F C T van der Helm,et al.  A kinematical analysis of the shoulder after arthroplasty during a hair combing task. , 2006, Clinical biomechanics.

[7]  G. Walch,et al.  Morphologic study of the glenoid in primary glenohumeral osteoarthritis. , 1999, The Journal of arthroplasty.

[8]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 1: theoretical background. , 2005, Gait & posture.

[9]  Mark A Carey,et al.  Reliability, validity, and clinical usability of a digital goniometer. , 2010, Work.

[10]  P. Raiss,et al.  Can shoulder arthroplasty restore the range of motion in activities of daily living? A prospective 3D video motion analysis study. , 2010, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[11]  Jaap Harlaar,et al.  The globe system: an unambiguous description of shoulder positions in daily life movements. , 2003, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[12]  A. Cappozzo,et al.  Human movement analysis using stereophotogrammetry. Part 2: instrumental errors. , 2004, Gait & posture.

[13]  P LaStayo,et al.  Intrarater reliability of a new method and instrumentation for measuring passive supination and pronation: a preliminary study. , 2001, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[14]  M. Mullaney,et al.  Reliability of shoulder range of motion comparing a goniometer to a digital level , 2010, Physiotherapy theory and practice.

[15]  Christian Gerber,et al.  A review of the Constant score: modifications and guidelines for its use. , 2008, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[16]  Bryan Buchholz,et al.  ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion--Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. , 2005, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  Kenneth Johnson,et al.  Closing in on the neural mechanisms of finger joint angle sense. Focus on "Quantitative analysis of dynamic strain sensitivity in human skin mechanoreceptors". , 2004, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Oliver Rettig,et al.  Proprioception in total, hemi- and reverse shoulder arthroplasty in 3D motion analyses: a prospective study , 2009, International Orthopaedics.

[19]  C. Constant,et al.  An evaluation of the Constant-Murley shoulder assessment. , 1997, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. British volume.

[20]  T. Thornhill,et al.  Total shoulder arthroplasty: long-term survivorship, functional outcome, and quality of life. , 2005, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[21]  F C T van der Helm,et al.  Requirements for upper extremity motions during activities of daily living. , 2005, Clinical biomechanics.

[22]  Oliver Rettig,et al.  Three-dimensional motion analysis of compensatory movements in patients with radioulnar synostosis performing activities of daily living , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[23]  M. Wirth,et al.  A prospective functional outcome study of shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with an intact rotator cuff. , 2003, Journal of shoulder and elbow surgery.

[24]  Oliver Rettig,et al.  A new kinematic model of the upper extremity based on functional joint parameter determination for shoulder and elbow. , 2009, Gait & posture.

[25]  S. Seber,et al.  Normal Range of Motion of the Joints of the Upper Extremity in Male Subjects, with Special Reference to Side* , 1996, The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume.

[26]  P. Raiss,et al.  Does the reverse shoulder prosthesis medialize the center of rotation in the glenohumeral joint? , 2013, Gait & posture.

[27]  D. Burdon,et al.  Clinical methods of goniometry: a comparative study. , 1992, Disability and rehabilitation.

[28]  S. Azen,et al.  Reliability of goniometric measurements. , 1978, Physical therapy.

[29]  S. Wolf,et al.  Proprioception 3 years after shoulder arthroplasty in 3D motion analysis: a prospective study , 2012, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[30]  M. Kolber,et al.  The reliability and minimal detectable change of shoulder mobility measurements using a digital inclinometer , 2011, Physiotherapy theory and practice.

[31]  P D Milburn,et al.  Determining rigid body transformation parameters from ill-conditioned spatial marker co-ordinates. , 2006, Journal of biomechanics.