Statistical modelling of networked human-automation performance using working memory capacity

This study examines the challenging problem of modelling the interaction between individual attentional limitations and decision-making performance in networked human-automation system tasks. Analysis of real experimental data from a task involving networked supervision of multiple unmanned aerial vehicles by human participants shows that both task load and network message quality affect performance, but that these effects are modulated by individual differences in working memory (WM) capacity. These insights were used to assess three statistical approaches for modelling and making predictions with real experimental networked supervisory performance data: classical linear regression, non-parametric Gaussian processes and probabilistic Bayesian networks. It is shown that each of these approaches can help designers of networked human-automated systems cope with various uncertainties in order to accommodate future users by linking expected operating conditions and performance from real experimental data to observable cognitive traits like WM capacity. Practitioner Summary: Working memory (WM) capacity helps account for inter-individual variability in operator performance in networked unmanned aerial vehicle supervisory tasks. This is useful for reliable performance prediction near experimental conditions via linear models; robust statistical prediction beyond experimental conditions via Gaussian process models and probabilistic inference about unknown task conditions/WM capacities via Bayesian network models.

[1]  Hiroshi Furukawa,et al.  A flexible delegation-type interface enhances system performance in human supervision of multiple robots: empirical studies with RoboFlag , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[2]  B. S. Manoj,et al.  Communication challenges in emergency response , 2007, Commun. ACM.

[3]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Neurogenetics of Working Memory and Decision Making under Time Pressure , 2010 .

[4]  Mica R. Endsley,et al.  Toward a Theory of Situation Awareness in Dynamic Systems , 1995, Hum. Factors.

[5]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Bayes net toolbox for Matlab , 1999 .

[6]  Tyler H. Shaw,et al.  Modeling Human-Automation Team Performance in Networked Systems: Individual Differences in Working Memory Count , 2010 .

[7]  Carla T. Joyner,et al.  Concurrent Performance of Gunner's and Robotics Operator's Tasks in a Multitasking Environment , 2009 .

[8]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Adaptive Aiding of Human-Robot Teaming , 2011 .

[9]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Predicting Controller Capacity in Supervisory Control of Multiple UAVs , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[10]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Operator Performance and Intelligent Aiding in Unmanned Aerial Vehicle Scheduling , 2007, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[11]  Mary L. Cummings,et al.  Developing Operator Capacity Estimates for Supervisory Control of Autonomous Vehicles , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[12]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Humans and Automation: Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Nasser M. Nasrabadi,et al.  Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning , 2006, Technometrics.

[14]  Scott M. Galster,et al.  Managing Multiple Uavs: Are we Asking the Right Questions? , 2006 .

[15]  Carl E. Rasmussen,et al.  Warped Gaussian Processes , 2003, NIPS.

[16]  R. Engle Working Memory Capacity as Executive Attention , 2002 .

[17]  Carlo Alberto Avizzano,et al.  Human-Robot Interactions in Future Military Operations , 2011 .

[18]  Florian Jentsch Automation Strategies for Facilitating Human Interaction with Military Unmanned Vehicles , 2016 .

[19]  John Yen,et al.  Learning HMM-based cognitive load models for supporting human-agent teamwork , 2010, Cognitive Systems Research.

[20]  Martha Grabowski,et al.  Network Performance Impacts on Operators in Safety-critical Systems , 2006, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Decis. Mak..

[21]  Prasanna Velagapudi,et al.  Using humans as sensors in robotic search , 2009, 2009 12th International Conference on Information Fusion.

[22]  Nicholas Roy,et al.  Comparing Learning Techniques for Hidden Markov Models of Human Supervisory Control Behavior , 2009 .

[23]  Eric R. Ziegel,et al.  Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences , 2004, Technometrics.

[24]  Frederik W. Heger,et al.  Sliding Autonomy for Complex Coordinated Multi-Robot Tasks: Analysis & Experiments , 2006, Robotics: Science and Systems.

[25]  Andry Rakotonirainy,et al.  Real-time performance modelling of a Sustained Attention to Response Task , 2010, Ergonomics.

[26]  Raja Parasuraman,et al.  Adaptive Automation for Human Supervision of Multiple Uninhabited Vehicles: Effects on Change Detection, Situation Awareness, and Mental Workload , 2009 .

[27]  Robert S. Bolia,et al.  User-Centered Evaluation of Multi-National Communication and Collaborative Technologies in a Network-Centric Air Battle Management Environment , 2004 .

[28]  Jessie Y C Chen,et al.  UAV-guided navigation for ground robot tele-operation in a military reconnaissance environment , 2010, Ergonomics.

[29]  Birsen Donmez,et al.  Modeling Workload Impact in Multiple Unmanned Vehicle Supervisory Control , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[30]  David Heckerman,et al.  A Tutorial on Learning with Bayesian Networks , 1999, Innovations in Bayesian Networks.

[31]  Christopher D. Wickens,et al.  15. Workload and Automation Reliability in Unmanned Air Vehicles , 2006 .

[32]  Nancy J. Cooke Human Factors of Remotely Operated Vehicles , 2006 .