Predicting and accelerating motor recovery after stroke.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review presents recent developments in the prediction of motor recovery after stroke; explores whether rehabilitation interventions delivered during the spontaneous recovery process can improve outcomes; and identifies the first trials to focus on the rate rather than extent of motor recovery (Supplementary Digital Content 1). RECENT FINDINGS Two recent studies have attempted to accelerate the rate of motor recovery during the first few weeks after stroke, with neuromodulation techniques designed to facilitate excitability of the ipsilesional motor cortex. One trial using transcranial direct current stimulation was negative, and the other trial using bilateral priming was positive. These contrasting results may be explained by important differences in trial design. This new focus on modifying rate, rather than extent, of motor recovery is in line with accumulating evidence that the motor recovery plateau is largely determined by the extent of damage to descending motor pathways, which is currently untreatable. SUMMARY Interventions that facilitate neural plasticity and reorganization may accelerate recovery of motor function during the spontaneous recovery period, without affecting final outcome. This may represent a useful new approach for future trials conducted during rehabilitation at the subacute stage of stroke.

[1]  Matthew Petoe,et al.  The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  Susan D Horn,et al.  Timing of initiation of rehabilitation after stroke. , 2005, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[3]  P. Bach-y-Rita,et al.  Reconsidering the motor recovery plateau in stroke rehabilitation. , 2004, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[4]  Grant D. Huang,et al.  Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. , 2010, The New England journal of medicine.

[5]  T. Murphy,et al.  Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[6]  P. Stanzione,et al.  Transcranial direct current stimulation of the affected hemisphere does not accelerate recovery of acute stroke patients , 2013, European journal of neurology.

[7]  W. Byblow,et al.  Ipsilateral Motor Pathways after Stroke: Implications for Non-Invasive Brain Stimulation , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[8]  M. Hennerici,et al.  Pathophysiology of Stroke Rehabilitation: The Natural Course of Clinical Recovery, Use-Dependent Plasticity and Rehabilitative Outcome , 2006, Cerebrovascular Diseases.

[9]  A. McIntyre,et al.  Time to Rethink Long-Term Rehabilitation Management of Stroke Patients , 2012, Topics in stroke rehabilitation.

[10]  Steven C Cramer,et al.  Stem cells as an emerging paradigm in stroke 3: enhancing the development of clinical trials. , 2014, Stroke.

[11]  T. Wieloch,et al.  Mechanisms of neural plasticity following brain injury , 2006, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  Alana B. McCambridge,et al.  Mirror Symmetric Bimanual Movement Priming Can Increase Corticomotor Excitability and Enhance Motor Learning , 2012, PloS one.

[13]  W. Byblow,et al.  Priming the motor system enhances the effects of upper limb therapy in chronic stroke. , 2008, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[14]  P. Langhorne,et al.  Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review , 2009, The Lancet Neurology.

[15]  Michael Chopp,et al.  Stem Cell Therapy as an Emerging Paradigm for Stroke (STEPS) II , 2011, Stroke.

[16]  G. Schlaug,et al.  Structural integrity of corticospinal motor fibers predicts motor impairment in chronic stroke , 2010, Neurology.

[17]  J. P. Miller,et al.  Effect of constraint-induced movement therapy on upper extremity function 3 to 9 months after stroke: the EXCITE randomized clinical trial. , 2006, JAMA.

[18]  J. Krakauer,et al.  Prediction of motor recovery using initial impairment and fMRI 48 h poststroke. , 2011, Cerebral cortex.

[19]  T. Olsen,et al.  Recovery of upper extremity function in stroke patients: the Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1994, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[20]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Intensity of leg and arm training after primary middle-cerebral-artery stroke: a randomised trial , 1999, The Lancet.

[21]  S. Studenski,et al.  The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[22]  Gert Kwakkel,et al.  Early Prediction of Outcome of Activities of Daily Living After Stroke: A Systematic Review , 2011, Stroke.

[23]  Chia-Hsiung Cheng,et al.  Effects of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation on Motor Functions in Patients With Stroke: A Meta-Analysis , 2012, Stroke.

[24]  W. Byblow,et al.  Rehabilitation is Initiated Early After Stroke, but Most Motor Rehabilitation Trials Are Not: A Systematic Review , 2013, Stroke.

[25]  M. Chopp,et al.  Neurorestorative treatment of stroke: Cell and pharmacological approaches , 2006, NeuroRX.

[26]  T. Olsen,et al.  Outcome and time course of recovery in stroke. Part II: Time course of recovery. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1995, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[27]  Gerard Blasco,et al.  Decreased Corticospinal Tract Fractional Anisotropy Predicts Long-term Motor Outcome After Stroke , 2013, Stroke.

[28]  H Kalimo,et al.  Low TENS treatment on post-stroke paretic arm: a three-year follow-up , 2000, Clinical rehabilitation.

[29]  W. Byblow,et al.  Bilateral Priming Accelerates Recovery of Upper Limb Function After Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, Stroke.

[30]  E. Troisi,et al.  Early versus delayed inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a matched comparison conducted in Italy. , 2000, Archives of physical medicine and rehabilitation.

[31]  L. von Koch,et al.  A Randomized Controlled Trial of Early Supported Discharge and Continued Rehabilitation at Home After Stroke: Five-Year Follow-Up of Patient Outcome , 2005, Stroke.

[32]  E. Khedr,et al.  Long‐term effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on motor function recovery after acute ischemic stroke , 2010, Acta neurologica Scandinavica.

[33]  D. Walker-Batson,et al.  Amphetamine paired with physical therapy accelerates motor recovery after stroke. Further evidence. , 1995, Stroke.

[34]  A. Butler,et al.  A meta-analysis of the efficacy of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation for upper limb motor recovery in stroke survivors. , 2013, Journal of hand therapy : official journal of the American Society of Hand Therapists.

[35]  G. Kwakkel,et al.  Accuracy of Physical Therapists' Early Predictions of Upper-Limb Function in Hospital Stroke Units: The EPOS Study , 2012, Physical Therapy.

[36]  R. Sacco,et al.  Trajectory of Functional Decline Before and After Ischemic Stroke: The Northern Manhattan Study , 2012, Stroke.

[37]  C. Gerloff,et al.  Influence of Stroke Infarct Location on Functional Outcome Measured by the Modified Rankin Scale , 2014, Stroke.