The Accessibility of Conceptual Number to the Processes of Subject–Verb Agreement in English☆☆☆

Abstract Four experiments investigated whether the conceptual number of a subject phrase can control verb agreement in English. Following a study by Bock and Miller (1991, Experiment 2), speakers provided sentence completions for grammatically singular subject phrases that referred to one referent (e.g., The trap for the rats ) or to distributed copies of a referent (e.g., The stamp on the envelopes ). The numbers of plural agreement errors produced in the completions were compared. Contrary to Bock and Miller's findings, significantly more errors were produced following the distributive-referent phrases. The results of two rating studies showed that the phrases used here were easier to imagine and therefore conceptually more accessible than the phrases used in Bock and Miller's study. Additional evidence for the role of conceptual accessibility came from a positive correlation between the phrases' imageability ratings and the number of agreement errors they elicited. The implications of these results for theoretical issues concerning the interaction between conceptual and grammatical encoding are discussed.

[1]  M. Garrett.  Processes in language production , 1988 .

[2]  G. Dell,et al.  Lexical access in aphasic and nonaphasic speakers. , 1997, Psychological review.

[3]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Language production : Grammatical encoding , 1994 .

[4]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Controlling number agreement on verbs and anaphors , 1992 .

[5]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness, imagery, and meaningfulness values for 925 nouns. , 1968, Journal of experimental psychology.

[6]  Shannon Dawn Moeser.  Memory for meaning and wording in concrete and abstract sentences , 1974 .

[7]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  An Information-Based Theory Of Agreement , 1988 .

[8]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Constructing Subject-Verb Agreement in Speech: The Role of Semantic and Morphological Factors , 1995 .

[9]  A. Lecours,et al.  Biological perspectives on language , 1984 .

[10]  W. Levelt,et al.  Speaking: From Intention to Articulation , 1990 .

[11]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Meaning, sound, and syntax: Lexical priming in sentence production. , 1986 .

[12]  J. K. Bock,et al.  Conceptual accessibility and syntactic structure in sentence formulation , 1985, Cognition.

[13]  Kathryn Bock,et al.  Meaning, sound and syntax in english number agreement , 1993 .

[14]  K. Bock.  Regulating mental energy: Performance units in language production , 1992 .

[15]  M. Garrett.  Levels of processing in sentence production , 1980 .

[16]  T. Berg.  The resolution of number conflicts in English and German agreement patterns , 1998 .

[17]  B. Leupen,et al.  Design and analysis , 1997 .

[18]  Gerard Kempen,et al.  An Incremental Procedural Grammar for Sentence Formulation , 1987, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  Marcia K. Johnson,et al.  Comprehension factors in interpreting memory for abstract and concrete sentences , 1972 .

[20]  Morton B. Brown,et al.  372: The Anova and Multiple Comparisons for Data with Heterogeneous Variances , 1974 .

[21]  A. Paivio,et al.  Concreteness and imagery in sentence meaning. , 1969 .

[22]  Brian Butterworth,et al.  Subject-verb agreement in Spanish and English: Differences in the role of conceptual constraints , 1996, Cognition.

[23]  M. H. Kelly,et al.  Word and World Order: Semantic, Phonological, and Metrical Determinants of Serial Position , 1993, Cognitive Psychology.

[24]  B. L. Welch.  ON THE COMPARISON OF SEVERAL MEAN VALUES: AN ALTERNATIVE APPROACH , 1951 .

[25]  M. Schwartz,et al.  The role of noun imagery in the speed of processing the grammaticality of adjective-noun phrases , 1977, Memory & cognition.

[26]  Kathleen M. Eberhard,et al.  The Marked Effect of Number on Subject–Verb Agreement☆ , 1997 .

[27]  Anne Cutler,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[28]  K. Holyoak.  The role of imagery in the evaluation of sentences: Imagery or semantic factors? , 1974 .

[29]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  One or more labels on the bottles? Notional concord in Dutch and French , 1996 .

[30]  P. Thorndyke.  Conceptual complexity and imagery in comprehension and memory , 1975 .

[31]  J L Nicol.  Effects of clausal structure on subject-verb agreement errors , 1995, Journal of psycholinguistic research.