Modelling crime linkage with Bayesian networks.

When two or more crimes show specific similarities, such as a very distinct modus operandi, the probability that they were committed by the same offender becomes of interest. This probability depends on the degree of similarity and distinctiveness. We show how Bayesian networks can be used to model different evidential structures that can occur when linking crimes, and how they assist in understanding the complex underlying dependencies. That is, how evidence that is obtained in one case can be used in another and vice versa. The flip side of this is that the intuitive decision to "unlink" a case in which exculpatory evidence is obtained leads to serious overestimation of the strength of the remaining cases.

[1]  Alex Biedermann,et al.  Two Items of Evidence, No Putative Source: An Inference Problem in Forensic Intelligence , 2006, Journal of forensic sciences.

[2]  Ray Bull,et al.  Behavioural case linkage with solved and unsolved crimes. , 2012, Forensic science international.

[3]  A. Davies,et al.  Rapists' behaviour: a three aspect model as a basis for analysis and the identification of serial crime. , 1992, Forensic science international.

[4]  Chris Brunsdon,et al.  Linking serious sexual assaults through behaviour , 2001 .

[5]  Janet I. Warren,et al.  Linkage analysis: Modus operandi, ritual, and signature in serial sexual crime , 2003 .

[6]  C M Triggs,et al.  An extended likelihood ratio framework for interpreting evidence. , 2006, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[7]  Jonathan Whitaker,et al.  Interpreting small quantities of DNA: the hierarchy of propositions and the use of Bayesian networks. , 2002, Journal of forensic sciences.

[8]  Alex Biedermann,et al.  Inadequacies of posterior probabilities for the assessment of scientific evidence , 2005 .

[9]  Colin Aitken,et al.  Bayesian Networks and Probabilistic Inference in Forensic Science , 2006 .

[10]  Norman Fenton,et al.  Calculating and understanding the value of any type of match evidence when there are potential testing errors , 2014, Artificial Intelligence and Law.

[11]  D V Canter,et al.  Linking commercial burglaries by modus operandi: tests using regression and ROC analysis. , 2002, Science & justice : journal of the Forensic Science Society.

[12]  Pierre Margot,et al.  Forensic Intelligence and Crime Analysis , 2003 .

[13]  N. J. A. Sloane,et al.  The On-Line Encyclopedia of Integer Sequences , 2003, Electron. J. Comb..