The Ethical Implications of HCI's Turn to the Cultural

We explore the ethical implications of HCI's turn to the ‘cultural’. This is motivated by an awareness of how cultural applications, in our case interactive performances, raise ethical issues that may challenge established research ethics processes. We review research ethics, HCI's engagement with ethics and the ethics of theatrical performance. Following an approach grounded in Responsible Research Innovation, we present the findings from a workshop in which artists, curators, commissioners, and researchers explored ethical challenges revealed by four case studies. We identify six ethical challenges for HCI's engagement with cultural applications: transgression, boundaries, consent, withdrawal, data, and integrity. We discuss two broader implications of these: managing tensions between multiple overlapping ethical frames; and the importance of managing ethical challenges during and after an experience as well as beforehand. Finally, we discuss how our findings extend previous discussions of Value Sensitive Design in HCI.

[1]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  HCI Theory: Classical, Modern, and Contemporary , 2012, HCI Theory.

[2]  Stefan Rennick Egglestone,et al.  Performing thrill: designing telemetry systems and spectator interfaces for amusement rides , 2008, CHI.

[3]  N. Denzin Interpretive Ethnography: Ethnographic Practices for the 21st Century , 1996 .

[4]  Jennifer G. Sheridan,et al.  Encouraging witting participation and performance in digital live art , 2007, BCS HCI.

[5]  Marina Jirotka,et al.  Towards a closer dialogue between policy and practice: responsible design in HCI , 2014, CHI.

[6]  Paul Dourish,et al.  Unpacking "privacy" for a networked world , 2003, CHI '03.

[7]  Robert Caverly,et al.  Responsible Innovation: Managing the Responsible Emergence of Science and Innovation in Society , 2013 .

[8]  Geoffrey C. Bowker,et al.  Values in design , 2011, Commun. ACM.

[9]  Jane Goodall,et al.  An Order of Pure Decision: Un-Natural Selection in the Work of Stelarc and Orlan , 1999 .

[10]  R. V. Schomberg A Vision of Responsible Research and Innovation , 2013 .

[11]  Nicholas Ridout,et al.  Theatre and Ethics , 2009 .

[12]  Mark Blythe,et al.  Funology:From Usability to Enjoyment , 2003 .

[13]  Stefan Rennick Egglestone,et al.  Breath control of amusement rides , 2011, CHI.

[14]  K. Gegenfurtner,et al.  Design Issues in Gaze Guidance Under review with ACM Transactions on Computer Human Interaction , 2009 .

[15]  Marina Jirotka,et al.  Responsible research and innovation in Information and Communication Technology , 2013 .

[16]  Joe Marshall,et al.  Uncomfortable interactions , 2012, CHI.

[17]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Staying open to interpretation: engaging multiple meanings in design and evaluation , 2006, DIS '06.

[18]  Ann Morrison,et al.  Building sensitising terms to understand free-play in open-ended interactive art environments , 2011, CHI.

[19]  Stefan Rennick Egglestone,et al.  Performance-Led Research in the Wild , 2013, TCHI.

[20]  Ralf Dresner,et al.  Witnessing Beyond Recognition , 2016 .

[21]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  Responsible Research and Innovation in Information and Communication Technology: Identifying and Engaging with the Ethical Implications of ICTs , 2013 .

[22]  Marc Lenglet,et al.  Responsible innovation in finance: directions and implications , 2013 .

[23]  J. Stilgoe,et al.  Developing a framework for responsible innovation* , 2013, The Ethics of Nanotechnology, Geoengineering and Clean Energy.

[24]  Tom Kuhn,et al.  Brecht on Theatre , 2014, The Applied Theatre Reader.

[25]  Stuart Reeves,et al.  Designing Interfaces in Public Settings - Understanding the Role of the Spectator in Human-Computer Interaction , 2011, Human-Computer Interaction Series.

[26]  Hermann Engesser,et al.  Reality broken? , 2012, Informatik-Spektrum.

[27]  P. H. Kahn,et al.  Human values, ethics, and design , 2002 .

[28]  J. L. Chandra,et al.  Art of Life , 1912, The Indian Medical Gazette.

[29]  Steve Benford,et al.  Ambiguity as a resource for design , 2003, CHI '03.

[30]  Frances Rifkin The ethics of Participatory Theatre in higher education , 2011 .

[31]  John Knight Ethics and HCI , 2006 .

[32]  Tom Rodden,et al.  An informed view on consent for UbiComp , 2013, UbiComp.

[33]  StahlBernd Carsten,et al.  From computer ethics to responsible research and innovation in ICT , 2014 .

[34]  Joe Marshall,et al.  The Challenges of Using Biodata in Promotional Filmmaking , 2015, ACM Trans. Comput. Hum. Interact..

[35]  E. Whittaker,et al.  Adjudicating entitlements: the emerging discourses of research ethics boards , 2005, Health.

[36]  Ronald E. Anderson ACM code of ethics and professional conduct , 1992, CACM.

[37]  Phoebe Sengers,et al.  Nourishing the ground for sustainable HCI: considerations from ecologically engaged art , 2009, CHI.

[38]  Scott P. Robertson,et al.  Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems , 1991 .

[39]  Gilbert Cockton,et al.  Value-centred HCI , 2004, NordiCHI '04.

[40]  Pelle Ehn,et al.  Work-oriented design of computer artifacts , 1989 .

[41]  Steve Benford,et al.  Orchestrating a mixed reality performance , 2001, CHI.

[42]  Steve Benford,et al.  Performing Mixed Reality , 2011 .

[43]  Helen Nissenbaum,et al.  Values at play: design tradeoffs in socially-oriented game design , 2005, CHI.

[44]  M. Gorman,et al.  A framework for responsible innovation , 2013 .

[45]  Claire Gilbert Foster,et al.  The Nazi doctors and the Nuremberg Code: human rights in human experimentation , 1995 .

[46]  Hugh Glaser,et al.  Linked Open Government Data: Lessons from Data.gov.uk , 2012, IEEE Intelligent Systems.

[47]  Bernd Carsten Stahl,et al.  Responsible research and innovation in information systems , 2012, Eur. J. Inf. Syst..

[48]  R.I.A. Mercuri,et al.  Technology as Experience , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication.

[49]  J. Jacobs,et al.  Gender and collective memory: Women and representation at Auschwitz , 2008 .

[50]  Alan Borning,et al.  Next steps for value sensitive design , 2012, CHI.

[51]  R. Edwards,et al.  Ethics and feminist research: theory and practice , 2012 .

[52]  Julie Kent,et al.  Social Science Gets the Ethics Treatment: Research governance and ethical review , 2002 .

[53]  Marina Jirotka,et al.  Towards Ethical Governance of Social Machines , 2013, 2013 International Conference on Cloud and Green Computing.

[54]  Steve Benford,et al.  "Act natural": instructions, compliance and accountability in ambulatory experiences , 2012, CHI.

[55]  Patrick Olivier,et al.  Designing from within: humanaquarium , 2011, CHI.

[56]  Winfield J. Wells Responsible innovation. , 2014, The Journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery.

[57]  Yvonne Rogers,et al.  Reflecting human values in the digital age , 2009, CACM.

[58]  Tom Rodden,et al.  Consent for all: revealing the hidden complexity of terms and conditions , 2013, CHI.

[59]  Matthew Chalmers,et al.  Categorised ethical guidelines for large scale mobile HCI , 2013, CHI.

[60]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Effective Systems Design and Requirements Analysis , 1995 .

[61]  David H Guston,et al.  Understanding ‘anticipatory governance’ , 2014, Social studies of science.

[62]  Christopher Coenen,et al.  Visions, Hype, and Expectations: A Place for Responsibility , 2013 .

[63]  Martin Flintham,et al.  The Malthusian Paradox: performance in an alternate reality game , 2014, Personal and Ubiquitous Computing.

[64]  Enid Mumford,et al.  Effective systems design and requirements analysis : the ETHICS approach , 1995 .

[65]  P. Zimbardo,et al.  On the ethics of intervention in human psychological research: with special reference to the Stanford Prison Experiment. , 1973, Cognition.

[66]  Steve Benford,et al.  A conversation between trees: what data feels like in the forest , 2013, CHI.

[67]  Mary Boulton,et al.  Informed consent in a changing environment. , 2007, Social science & medicine.

[68]  K. Walton,et al.  Art and the Aesthetic: An Institutional Analysis. , 1977 .

[69]  John Jones,et al.  Bad Blood: The Tuskegee syphi-lis experiment: A tragedy of race and medicine , 1981 .

[70]  Steve Benford,et al.  The Frame of the Game: Blurring the Boundary between Fiction and Reality in Mobile Experiences , 2006, CHI 2006.

[71]  W. Kissick,et al.  ON THE HUMAN USE OF HUMAN BEINGS , 1969, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.