Role of laparoscopy in ureteropelvic junction obstruction with concomitant pathology: a case series study

Introduction Laparoscopic pyeloplasty is considered a standard treatment for ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO). However, the presence of another pathology makes it a more challenging operation and guides the surgeon towards open conversion. In this study, we present our experience in difficult pyeloplasty cases managed by laparoscopy. Material and methods Six patients (4 females and 2 males) with an average age of 44 and a range of 27 to 60 years old, were diagnosed for UPJO. Three were on the left side and 3 on the right side. In addition to UPJO, 2 patients had renal stones, one patient had both renal ptosis and an umbilical hernia, 3 patients had a para-pelvic cyst, hepatomegaly and malrotated kidney, respectively. All patients had a preoperative ultrasound, CT or IVU, and a renal isotope scan. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty was performed according to the dismembered Anderson-Hynes technique with auxiliary maneuver, according to the pathology. Results All patients were treated successfully for UPJO and the concomitant pathologies, except hepatomegaly and malrotation. Mean operative time was 125 minutes and estimated blood loss was <50 ml. Conclusions Laparoscopic pyeloplasty can be performed in difficult situations provided that the surgeon has enough experience with laparoscopy.

[1]  Z. Wang,et al.  Initial experiences with laparoscopy and flexible ureteroscopy combination pyeloplasty in management of ectopic pelvic kidney with stone and ureter–pelvic junction obstruction , 2015, Urolithiasis.

[2]  N. Hinata,et al.  Hydronephrosis after retroperitoneal laparoscopic dismembered Anderson–Hynes pyeloplasty in adult patients with ureteropelvic junction obstruction: A longitudinal analysis , 2014, Central European journal of urology.

[3]  J. Rivas,et al.  Approach to kidney stones associated with ureteropelvic junction obstruction during laparoscopic pyeloplasty , 2013, Central European journal of urology.

[4]  J. Rivas,et al.  Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty in the treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction , 2013, Central European journal of urology.

[5]  D. Canes,et al.  Difficulties in Urologic Laparoscopy Complications , 2011 .

[6]  D. Teber,et al.  Laparoscopic techniques for removal of renal and ureteral calculi. , 2009, Journal of endourology.

[7]  J. Kasprzak,et al.  Antegrade endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction. , 2009, Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A.

[8]  D. Assimos,et al.  Role of laparoscopic stone surgery. , 2008, Urology.

[9]  Joshua D. Wiesenthal,et al.  Laparoscopic pyeloplasty with simultaneous pyelolithotomy using a flexible ureteroscope. , 2004, The Canadian journal of urology.

[10]  L R Kavoussi,et al.  LAPAROSCOPIC PYELOPLASTY: Indications, Technique, and Long-Term Outcome , 1998 .

[11]  G. Bartsch,et al.  Laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction. , 1996, Urology.

[12]  F. Recker,et al.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty: preliminary report. , 1995, The Journal of urology.

[13]  G. Preminger,et al.  Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty. , 1993, The Journal of urology.

[14]  S. Goldman,et al.  Ureteropelvic junction obstruction: its occurrence in 3 members of a single family. , 1978, The Journal of urology.

[15]  R. May,et al.  Anomalies of the upper urinary tract. , 1956, McGill medical journal.