Transmembrane potential measurements on plant cells using the voltage-sensitive dye ANNINE-6

The charging of the plasma membrane is a necessary condition for the generation of an electric-field-induced permeability increase of the plasmalemma, which is usually explained by the creation and the growth of aqueous pores. For cells suspended in physiological buffers, the time domain of membrane charging is in the submicrosecond range. Systematic measurements using Nicotiana tabacum L. cv. Bright Yellow 2 (BY-2) protoplasts stained with the fast voltage-sensitive fluorescence dye ANNINE-6 have been performed using a pulsed laser fluorescence microscopy setup with a time resolution of 5 ns. A clear saturation of the membrane voltage could be measured, caused by a strong membrane permeability increase, commonly explained by enhanced pore formation, which prevents further membrane charging by external electric field exposure. The field strength dependence of the protoplast’s transmembrane potential VM shows strong asymmetric saturation characteristics due to the high resting potential of the plants plasmalemma. At the pole of the hyperpolarized hemisphere of the cell, saturation starts at an external field strength of 0.3 kV/cm, resulting in a measured transmembrane voltage shift of ∆VM = −150 mV, while on the cathodic (depolarized) cell pole, the threshold for enhanced pore formation is reached at a field strength of approximately 1.0 kV/cm and ∆VM = 450 mV, respectively. From this asymmetry of the measured maximum membrane voltage shifts, the resting potential of BY-2 protoplasts at the given experimental conditions can be determined to VR = −150 mV. Consequently, a strong membrane permeability increase occurs when the membrane voltage diverges |VM| = 300 mV from the resting potential of the protoplast. The largest membrane voltage change at a given external electric field occurs at the cell poles. The azimuthal dependence of the transmembrane potential, measured in angular intervals of 10° along the circumference of the cell, shows a flattening and a slight decrease at higher fields at the pole region due to enhanced pore formation. Additionally, at the hyperpolarized cell pole, a polarization reversal could be observed at an external field range around 1.0 kV/cm. This behavior might be attributed to a fast charge transfer through the membrane at the hyperpolarized pole, e.g., by voltage-gated channels.

[1]  M. Tester,et al.  Hyperpolarisation-activated calcium currents found only in cells from the elongation zone of Arabidopsis thaliana roots. , 2000, The Plant journal : for cell and molecular biology.

[2]  Stéphane Claverol,et al.  Lipid Rafts in Higher Plant Cells , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[3]  Juergen F Kolb,et al.  Regulation of intracellular calcium concentration by nanosecond pulsed electric fields. , 2009, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[4]  Steve W. Smye,et al.  Membrane electroporation theories: a review , 2006, Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing.

[5]  F. Bezanilla,et al.  Voltage-gated ion channels , 2005, IEEE Transactions on NanoBioscience.

[6]  L. Chernomordik,et al.  Voltage-induced nonconductive pre-pores and metastable single pores in unmodified planar lipid bilayer. , 2001, Biophysical journal.

[7]  A. Heuer,et al.  過冷却Lennard‐Jones流体におけるホッピング:準ベイスン,待ち時間分布および拡散 , 2003 .

[8]  L. Stukenbrock,et al.  On the electroporation of mash for the production of red wine , 2008, 2008 IEEE 35th International Conference on Plasma Science.

[9]  J. Steinbach,et al.  The conductance of the muscle nicotinic receptor channel changes rapidly upon gating. , 1995, Biophysical Journal.

[10]  E. Tekle,et al.  Electro-permeabilization of cell membranes: effect of the resting membrane potential. , 1990, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[11]  J Teissié,et al.  Direct observation in the millisecond time range of fluorescent molecule asymmetrical interaction with the electropermeabilized cell membrane. , 1997, Biophysical journal.

[12]  M. Sack,et al.  Triggered Marx generators for the industrial-scale electroporation of sugar beets , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications.

[13]  H. Itoh,et al.  Membrane conductance of an electroporated cell analyzed by submicrosecond imaging of transmembrane potential. , 1991, Biophysical journal.

[14]  Laura Marcu,et al.  Nanosecond pulsed electric fields perturb membrane phospholipids in T lymphoblasts , 2004, FEBS letters.

[15]  R. O. Price,et al.  Plasma membrane voltage changes during nanosecond pulsed electric field exposure. , 2006, Biophysical journal.

[16]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  High electrical field effects on cell membranes. , 2007, Bioelectrochemistry.

[17]  W. Swoboda,et al.  Molecular monitoring of inactivation efficiencies of bacteria during pulsed electric field treatment of clinical wastewater , 2008, Journal of applied microbiology.

[18]  K.H. Schoenbach,et al.  Real-time imaging of the membrane cirarging of mamalian cells exposed to nanosecond pulsed electric fields , 2004, Conference Record of the Twenty-Sixth International Power Modulator Symposium, 2004 and 2004 High-Voltage Workshop..

[19]  Leslie M. Loew,et al.  Potentiometric Membrane Dyes and Imaging Membrane Potential in Single Cells , 1999 .

[20]  Bernd Kuhn,et al.  High sensitivity of Stark-shift voltage-sensing dyes by one- or two-photon excitation near the red spectral edge. , 2004, Biophysical journal.

[21]  U. Zimmermann,et al.  Electric pulse induced membrane permeabilization. Spatial orientation and kinetics of solute efflux in freely suspended and dielectrophoretically aligned plant mesophyll protoplasts. , 1989, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[22]  E. Tekle,et al.  Selective and asymmetric molecular transport across electroporated cell membranes. , 1994, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  Kathryn M Mayer,et al.  Probing the lipid membrane dipole potential by atomic force microscopy. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[24]  J. Weaver,et al.  Theory of electroporation: A review , 1996 .

[25]  M. Rols,et al.  New insights in the visualization of membrane permeabilization and DNA/membrane interaction of cells submitted to electric pulses. , 2005, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[26]  D. Doyle,et al.  Structural changes during ion channel gating , 2004, Trends in Neurosciences.

[27]  Peter Fromherz,et al.  Monopole-Dipole Model for Symmetrical Solvatochromism of Hemicyanine Dyes , 1995 .

[28]  J W Moore,et al.  Membranes, ions, and impulses: Dedication to Kacy Cole , 1975 .

[29]  Karl H. Schoenbach,et al.  Stimulation of Capacitative Calcium Entry in HL-60 Cells by Nanosecond Pulsed Electric Fields* , 2004, Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[30]  Helmut Grubmüller,et al.  Kinetics, statistics, and energetics of lipid membrane electroporation studied by molecular dynamics simulations. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[31]  W. Krassowska,et al.  Modeling postshock evolution of large electropores. , 2003, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[32]  H. Pauly,et al.  Über die Impedanz einer Suspension von kugelförmigen Teilchen mit einer Schale , 1959 .

[33]  Bennett L Ibey,et al.  Lipid nanopores can form a stable, ion channel-like conduction pathway in cell membrane. , 2009, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[34]  J Teissié,et al.  An experimental evaluation of the critical potential difference inducing cell membrane electropermeabilization. , 1993, Biophysical journal.

[35]  P J White,et al.  Calcium channels in higher plants. , 2000, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[36]  Anellated Hemicyanine Dyes with Large Symmetrical Solvatochromism of Absorption and Fluorescence , 2003 .

[37]  Shin-Ho Chung,et al.  Guest Editorial Special Issue on Ion Channels—Bionanotubes , 2005 .

[38]  Boris Rubinsky,et al.  Instantaneous, quantitative single-cell viability assessment by electrical evaluation of cell membrane integrity with microfabricated devices , 2003 .

[39]  E. Blumwald,et al.  Hyperpolarization-activated Ca2+-permeable Channels in the Plasma Membrane of Tomato Cells , 1997, The Journal of Membrane Biology.

[40]  K. H. Schoenbach,et al.  Effects of submicrosecond, high intensity pulsed electric fields on living cells - intracellular electromanipulation , 2003 .

[41]  Mechanisms of electrically mediated cytosolic Ca2+ transients in aequorin-transformed tobacco cells. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[42]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Nanosecond pulsed electric field (nsPEF) effects on cells and tissues: apoptosis induction and tumor growth inhibition , 2001, PPPS-2001 Pulsed Power Plasma Science 2001. 28th IEEE International Conference on Plasma Science and 13th IEEE International Pulsed Power Conference. Digest of Papers (Cat. No.01CH37251).

[43]  Bernd Kuhn,et al.  Anellated hemicyanine dyes in a neuron membrane: Molecular Stark effect and optical voltage recording , 2003 .

[44]  James C Weaver,et al.  Active mechanisms are needed to describe cell responses to submicrosecond, megavolt-per-meter pulses: cell models for ultrashort pulses. , 2008, Biophysical journal.

[45]  K. Cole ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE OF SUSPENSIONS OF SPHERES , 1928, The Journal of general physiology.

[46]  W. Krassowska,et al.  Modeling electroporation in a single cell. , 2007, Biophysical journal.

[47]  J. Fromm,et al.  Electrical signals and their physiological significance in plants. , 2007, Plant, cell & environment.

[48]  Qin Hu,et al.  Molecular Dynamics Analysis of High Electric Pulse Effects on Bilayer Membranes Containing DPPC and DPPS , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

[49]  F. Yuan,et al.  Mechanistic Analysis of Electroporation-Induced Cellular Uptake of Macromolecules , 2008, Experimental biology and medicine.

[50]  K. Schoenbach,et al.  Nanosecond, high‐intensity pulsed electric fields induce apoptosis in human cells , 2003, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.