Summarizing DNA evidence when relatives are possible suspects

Abstract Summaries of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) evidence in criminal proceedings have been controversial in part because calculations of the probability of a “match” between crime and suspect samples assuming that the pairing of these samples occurred by chance typically have depended on independence or conditional independence assumptions that are subject to dispute. This article describes a new methodology that summarizes DNA evidence by addressing the possibility that a relative of the accused individual is the source of a crime sample, which can be viewed as complementary to assessing the probability of a “match” assuming that individuals in a broader population are paired by chance. The new technique uses a statistical criterion based on distances between bands from autoradiograph images to distinguish individuals without relying on any conditional independence assumptions. We apply the method to data from a paternity testing laboratory to illustrate its ability to distinguish between the DNA profi...

[1]  G. Walker Empirical aspects of strand displacement amplification. , 1993, PCR methods and applications.

[2]  B Budowle,et al.  Fixed-bin analysis for statistical evaluation of continuous distributions of allelic data from VNTR loci, for use in forensic comparisons. , 1991, American journal of human genetics.

[3]  K. Roeder DNA Fingerprinting: A Review of the Controversy , 1994 .

[4]  I W Evett,et al.  An illustration of the advantages of efficient statistical methods for RFLP analysis in forensic science. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[5]  J. E. Cohen The ceiling principle is not always conservative in assigning genotype frequencies for forensic DNA testing. , 1992, American journal of human genetics.

[6]  Ian W. Evett,et al.  Statistical Inference in Crime Investigations Using Deoxyribonucleic Acid Profiling , 1992 .

[7]  E. Lander,et al.  Forensic DNA Tests and Hardy-Weinberg Equilibrium , 1991, Science.

[8]  C. M. McLaughlin,et al.  Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) analysis by restriction fragment length polymorphisms of blood and other body fluid stains subjected to contamination and environmental insults. , 1991, Journal of forensic sciences.

[9]  J. Brookfield The effect of relatives on the likelihood ratio associated with DNA profile evidence in criminal cases. , 1994, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[10]  D. Kaye DNA Evidence: Probability, Population Genetics, and the Courts , 1993 .

[11]  Assessing the evidential value of DNA profiles matching without using the assumption of independent loci. , 1993, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[12]  Peter Donnelly,et al.  Inference in Forensic Identification , 1995 .

[13]  L. Kobilinsky Recovery and Stability of DNA in Samples of Forensic Science Significance. , 1992, Forensic science review.

[14]  David J. Werrett,et al.  Forensic application of DNA ‘fingerprints’ , 1985, Nature.

[15]  Donald A. Berry,et al.  Inferences Using DNA Profiling in Forensic Identification and Paternity Cases , 1991 .

[16]  D J Balding,et al.  DNA profile match probability calculation: how to allow for population stratification, relatedness, database selection and single bands. , 1994, Forensic science international.

[17]  J. E. Cohen,et al.  Violations of the ceiling principle: exact conditions and statistical evidence. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[18]  R. Shaler,et al.  Evaluation of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) isolated from human bloodstains exposed to ultraviolet light, heat, humidity, and soil contamination. , 1989, Journal of forensic sciences.

[19]  H. Chernoff Issues in DNA Fingerprinting , 1994 .

[20]  Population genetics of DNA profiles. , 1993, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[21]  S M Stigler,et al.  Galton and identification by fingerprints. , 1995, Genetics.

[22]  B S Weir,et al.  The effects of inbreeding on forensic calculations. , 1994, Annual review of genetics.

[23]  R. Lewontin [DNA Fingerprinting: A Review of the Controversy]: Comment: The Use of DNA Profiles in Forensic Contexts , 1994 .

[24]  E. Buse,et al.  Diversity of ethnic and racial VNTR RFLP fixed-bin frequency distributions. , 1994, American journal of human genetics.

[25]  I W Evett,et al.  Evaluating DNA profiles in a case where the defence is "it was my brother". , 1992, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[26]  R. Shaler,et al.  The effects of environment and substrata on deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA): the use of casework samples from New York City. , 1989, Journal of forensic sciences.

[27]  B Devlin,et al.  On the probability of matching DNA fingerprints. , 1992, Science.

[28]  A. Jeffreys,et al.  Individual-specific ‘fingerprints’ of human DNA , 1985, Nature.

[29]  A. Urquhart,et al.  Automated DNA profiling employing multiplex amplification of short tandem repeat loci. , 1993, PCR methods and applications.

[30]  K Lange,et al.  Match probabilities in racially admixed populations. , 1993, American journal of human genetics.

[31]  An efficient statistical procedure for interpreting DNA single locus profiling data in crime cases. , 1992, Journal - Forensic Science Society.

[32]  P. Donnelly,et al.  Comment: Some causes for concern about DNA profiles , 1994 .

[33]  E A Thompson,et al.  Bayesian interval estimation of genetic relationships: application to paternity testing. , 1988, American journal of human genetics.

[34]  Microbial DNA challenge studies of variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) probes used for DNA profiling analysis. , 1993, Journal of forensic sciences.

[35]  Gerald S. Rogers,et al.  Mathematical Statistics: A Decision Theoretic Approach , 1967 .

[36]  N E Morton,et al.  Kinship bioassay on hypervariable loci in blacks and Caucasians. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  K. Monson,et al.  A reassessment of frequency estimates of PvuII-generated VNTR profiles in a Finnish, an Italian, and a general U.S. Caucasian database: no evidence for ethnic subgroups affecting forensic estimates. , 1994, American journal of human genetics.

[38]  C. Brenner,et al.  The Avuncular Index and the Incest Index , 1988 .

[39]  D. Hartl,et al.  Population genetics in forensic DNA typing. , 1991, Science.

[40]  E. Southern Detection of specific sequences among DNA fragments separated by gel electrophoresis. , 1975, Journal of molecular biology.

[41]  [DNA Fingerprinting: A Review of the Controversy]: Comment: Theory and Practice in DNA Fingerprinting , 1994 .

[42]  N E Morton,et al.  Genetic structure of forensic populations. , 1992, American journal of human genetics.