Hinterland strategies of port authorities: A case study of the port of Barcelona

Port authorities generally focus on the development of the local port area and play a minor role in the development of port hinterlands, whereas shippers, forwarders, barge and rail operators have always been involved in the port-hinterland connection. The increasing importance of intermodal hinterland networks for the competitive position of ports has urged port authorities to become active in the hinterland. This new role has already been suggested by different academics. However, limited empirical evidence exists of port authorities taking stakes in inland terminals or developing transport services. Barcelona, as one of the leading port authorities in this respect, is used as a case study in this paper. The case study provides insight in the components and execution of the hinterland strategy of Barcelona. It shows that the strategy of the port authority of Barcelona and the consequent active involvement in the hinterland has had a significant impact on attracting container volumes from distant hinterlands and improving the accessibility of the port.

[1]  M. Horst,et al.  Coordination in Hinterland Transport Chains: A Major Challenge for the Seaport Community , 2008 .

[2]  Brian Slack,et al.  Transformation of port terminal operations: from the local to the global , 2005 .

[3]  H. Arjen van Klink,et al.  Gateways and intermodalism , 1998 .

[4]  Christopher A. Voss,et al.  Case research in operations management , 2002 .

[5]  Thomas R. Eisenmann,et al.  Strategies for Two Sided Markets , 2006 .

[6]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Port regionalization: towards a new phase in port development , 2005 .

[7]  B. Slack.  Satellite terminals: a local solution to hub congestion? , 1999 .

[8]  Jan Dul,et al.  Case Study Methodology in Business Research , 2007 .

[9]  K. Eisenhardt.  Building theories from case study research , 1989, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[10]  N. Nohria,et al.  Are leaders portable? , 2006, Harvard business review.

[11]  Valentina Carbone,et al.  The changing role of ports in supply-chain management: an empirical analysis , 2003 .

[12]  Pierre Franc,et al.  Understanding hinterland service integration by shipping lines and terminal operators: a theoretical and empirical analysis , 2010 .

[13]  J. Oosterhaven,et al.  Annual Report 2008 , 2009 .

[14]  Johan Woxenius,et al.  The dry port concept: connecting container seaports with the hinterland , 2009 .

[15]  T. Notteboom,et al.  The terminalization of supply chains: reassessing the role of terminals in port/hinterland logistical relationships , 2009 .

[16]  P. Verhoeven,et al.  A review of port authority functions: towards a renaissance? , 2010 .

[17]  U. Sekaran,et al.  Research Methods for Business : A Skill Building Approach (5th Edition) , 1992 .

[18]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Inland Terminals, Regions and Supply Chains , 2009 .

[19]  de Pw Peter Langen,et al.  Port competition and selection in contestable hinterlands; the case of Austria , 2007, European Journal of Transport and Infrastructure Research.

[20]  Theo Notteboom,et al.  Economic analysis of the European seaport system , 2009 .

[21]  R. Robinson.  Ports as elements in value-driven chain systems: the new paradigm , 2002 .

[22]  C. Shapiro,et al.  Network Externalities, Competition, and Compatibility , 1985 .

[23]  Alfred J. Baird,et al.  Comment Some reflections on port competition in the United States and western Europe , 1999 .

[24]  H. Meersman,et al.  Do mergers and alliances influence European shipping and port competition? , 2000 .

[25]  T. Notteboom.  Container Shipping And Ports: An Overview , 2004 .

[26]  Jean-Paul Rodrigue,et al.  Functions and actors of inland ports: European and North American dynamics , 2010 .