Motorcycle Conspicuity: The Effects Of Age And Vehicular Daytime Running Lights

Research has shown that riding a motorcycle can potentially be much more dangerous than operating a conventional vehicle. There are factors inherent in driving or riding a small two wheeled vehicle, such as a motorcycle, moped or even bicycle that can potentially decrease their ability to be seen or noticed by other drivers. This disadvantage is reflected in the disproportionate overrepresentation of injuries and/or fatalities incurred by this particular driving group. This creates a significant problem which deserves dedicated evaluation as to causative factors and/or influential variables. The following research was conducted with intentions to investigate the topic of motorcycle conspicuity so as to further explain the variables which positively contribute to a motorcycle being seen and to supplement the body of knowledge that currently exists on this topic. This study specifically evaluated the influence of sex, age, motorcycle lighting conditions, and vehicular daytime running lights upon one’s ability to effectively detect a motorcycle within a “high fidelity” simulated environment. This research additionally sought to examine the feasibility and validity of using a novel fixed base “high fidelity” simulator for the evaluation of motorcycle conspicuity. The results from this research clearly indicate a link between vehicular DRLs and the effective detection of motorcycles and also support previous research as to the effectiveness of motorcycle DRLs. Additionally, these results suggest that as one ages, certain degradations in vision, cognition, and physiology occur which decrease one’s performance in detecting and responding to a motorcycle. These findings additionally provide support for the use of a “high definition” fixed base simulator as a valid technology for the evaluation of motorcycle conspicuity.

[1]  David R. Thom,et al.  MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT CAUSE FACTORS AND IDENTIFICATION OF COUNTERMEASURES. VOLUME II: APPENDIX/SUPPLEMENTAL DATA , 1980 .

[2]  P. Bellaby,et al.  Approaches to the Risk of Riding Motorcycles: Reflections on the Problem of Reconciling Statistical Risk Assessment and Motorcyclists' Own Reasons for Riding , 2001 .

[3]  Mark S. Horswill,et al.  Hazard perception and its relevance for driver licensing , 1999 .

[4]  I. Kwan,et al.  Visibility aids for pedestrians and cyclists: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. , 2004, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  Mary Lynn Mefford,et al.  High visibility safety apparel and nighttime conspicuity of pedestrians in work zones. , 2004, Journal of safety research.

[6]  Michael Sivak,et al.  The Effect of Improvements in Motorcycle/Motorcyclist Conspicuity on Driver Behavior , 1981 .

[7]  J Luoma,et al.  Effects of retroreflector positioning on nighttime recognition of pedestrians. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[8]  Mark S Horswill,et al.  A behavioral comparison between motorcyclists and a matched group of non-motorcycling car drivers: factors influencing accident risk. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[9]  B. Huang,et al.  A Literature Review on Motorcycle Collisions Final Report , 2004 .

[10]  G. A. Thomson,et al.  The role frontal motorcycle conspicuity has in road accidents , 1980 .

[11]  David F. Preusser,et al.  EXPERIMENTAL EVALUATION OF ALTERNATIVE CONSPICUITY-ENHANCEMENT TECHNIQUES FOR PEDESTRIANS AND BICYCLISTS , 1986 .

[12]  Richard A. Tyrrell,et al.  Limitations in Drivers' Ability to Recognize Pedestrians at Night , 2005, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Suzanne L. Holcombe.  United States Patent and Trademark Office , 2008 .

[14]  S J GERATHEWOHL,et al.  Conspicuity of flashing light signals of different frequency and duration. , 1954, Journal of experimental psychology.

[15]  P D MCCORMACK,et al.  THE POSITIVE SKEW OBSERVED IN REACTION TIME DISTRIBUTIONS. , 1964, Canadian journal of psychology.

[16]  L Hakamies-Blomqvist,et al.  SAFETY OF OLDER PERSONS IN TRAFFIC , 2004 .

[17]  John F. Corso,et al.  Aging Sensory Systems and Perception , 1981 .

[18]  Michael S Janoff,et al.  EFFECT OF DAYTIME MOTORCYCLE HEADLIGHT LAWS ON MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENTS , 1971 .

[19]  Alessandra Marinoni,et al.  Are car drivers holding a motorcycle licence less responsible for motorcycle--car crash occurrence? A non-parametric approach. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Martin Langham,et al.  An analysis of 'looked but failed to see' accidents involving parked police vehicles , 2002, Ergonomics.

[21]  D. Alfred Owens,et al.  Biological Motion and Nighttime Pedestrian Conspicuity , 1994 .

[22]  H L Woltman,et al.  SOME DAY AND NIGHT VISUAL ASPECTS OF MOTORCYCLE SAFETY , 1974 .

[23]  Dallas E. Mulvaney,et al.  Effect of Distance of Photostimulation on a Photosensitive Epileptic Subject , 1979, Psychological reports.

[24]  A. Perlot,et al.  Review of the evidence for motorcycle and motorcar daytime lights , 2003 .

[25]  Mark S. Horswill,et al.  A COMPARATIVE APPROACH TO DIFFERENTIAL ACCIDENT LIABILITY: MOTORCYCLISTS VERSUS CAR DRIVERS , 2002 .

[26]  David Paine,et al.  Daytime Running Lights for Motorcycles , 2005 .

[27]  B. Cole,et al.  The effect of the density of background elements on the conspicuity of objects , 1982, Vision Research.

[28]  Donald W. Kline,et al.  SYMBOL SIGNING DESIGN FOR OLDER DRIVERS , 1997 .

[29]  K Lahtela,et al.  Adult visual choice-reaction time, age, sex and preparedness. A test of Welford's problem in a large population sample. , 1985, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[30]  David R. Thom,et al.  MOTORCYCLE ACCIDENT CAUSE FACTORS AND IDENTIFICATION OF COUNTERMEASURES. VOLUME I: TECHNICAL REPORT , 1981 .

[31]  F. L. Engel.  Visual conspicuity, visual search and fixation tendencies of the eye , 1977, Vision Research.

[32]  G Saunders,et al.  Emergency ambulances on the public highway linked with inconvenience and potential danger to road users , 2003, Emergency medicine journal : EMJ.

[33]  B. Hills.  Vision, Visibility, and Perception in Driving , 1980, Perception.

[34]  C Kirkby,et al.  EFFECT OF MOTORCYCLISTS' HIGH VISIBILITY AIDS ON DRIVER GAP ACCEPTANCE , 1978 .

[35]  Graham J Hole,et al.  Some factors affecting motorcyclists' conspicuity , 1996 .

[36]  G. Smith,et al.  Slowness and age: speed-accuracy mechanisms. , 1995, Psychology and aging.

[37]  Wendy A. Rogers,et al.  Designing warnings to compensate for age-related changes in perceptual and cognitive abilities , 1998 .

[38]  H Summala,et al.  Bicycle accidents and drivers' visual search at left and right turns. , 1996, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[39]  P. Hancock,et al.  The Perception of Arrival Time for Different Oncoming Vehicles at an Intersection , 1994 .

[40]  Mai-Britt Herslund,et al.  Looked-but-failed-to-see-errors in traffic. , 2003, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[41]  C. Owsley,et al.  Vision and Driving in the Elderly , 1994, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[42]  E Keskinen,et al.  Older drivers fail in intersections: speed discrepancies between older and younger male drivers. , 1998, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[43]  Frank Schieber,et al.  Nighttime Conspicuity of Highway Signs as a Function of Sign Brightness, Background Complexity and Age of Observer , 1997 .

[44]  S S Solomon.  Lime-yellow color as related to reduction of serious fire apparatus accidents--the case for visibility in emergency vehicle accident avoidance. , 1990, Journal of the American Optometric Association.

[45]  H. A. Witkin.  Individual differences in ease of perception of embedded figures. , 1950, Journal of personality.

[46]  Michael Sivak,et al.  ACCIDENTS AND THE NIGHTTIME CONSPICUITY OF TRUCKS , 1979 .

[47]  G E LONG,et al.  The effect of duration of onset and cessation of light flash on the intensity time relation in the peripheral retina. , 1951, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[48]  W A Harrison,et al.  Hazard perception and learner drivers: a theoretical discussion and an in-depth survey of driving instructors , 1999 .

[49]  A. Williams,et al.  The prospects of daytime running lights for reducing vehicle crashes in the United States. , 1995, Public health reports.

[50]  M S Janoff,et al.  Daytime motorcycle headlight and taillight operation , 1970 .

[51]  B Dulisse,et al.  Older drivers and risk to other road users. , 1997, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[52]  E J Fulton,et al.  THE EVALUATION OF AIDS TO THE DAYTIME CONSPICUITY OF MOTORCYCLES , 1985 .

[53]  E R Hoffmann,et al.  THE INFLUENCE OF MOTORCYCLE VISIBILITY ON TRAFFIC ACCIDENTS , 1977 .

[54]  G A Thomson.  Do measurements of motorcycle conspicuity really measure conspicuity effects? , 1982, Ergonomics.

[55]  M Sivak.  Human factors and road safety. Overview of research at the University of Michigan Transportation Research Institute between 1977 and 1986. , 1987, Applied ergonomics.

[56]  Errol R. Hoffmann,et al.  Conspicuity of Motorcycles , 1979 .

[57]  Kåre Rumar.  Running lights—conspicuity, glare and accident reduction , 1980 .

[58]  J Theeuwes,et al.  The effectiveness of side marker lamps: an experimental study. , 1997, Accident Analysis and Prevention.

[59]  J A Michon,et al.  Safety clothing for human traffic obstacles. , 1969, Ergonomics.

[60]  E R Hoffman,et al.  IMPROVEMENT OF FRONTAL CONSPICUITY OF MOTORCYCLES , 1976 .

[61]  J. Gibson.  The Senses Considered As Perceptual Systems , 1967 .

[62]  Narelle L. Haworth,et al.  Hazard perception and responding by motorcyclists: background and literature review , 2005 .

[63]  G. R. Jackson,et al.  Aging and Spatial Localization during Feature Search , 2000, Gerontology.

[64]  David Shinar,et al.  Eye Movements of Younger and Older Drivers , 1997, Hum. Factors.

[65]  Martin P Langham,et al.  Pedestrian conspicuity research: a review , 2003, Ergonomics.

[66]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Vision, aging, and driving: the problems of older drivers. , 1992, Journal of gerontology.

[67]  Dominique Lord,et al.  PEDESTRIAN ACCIDENTS WITH LEFT-TURNING TRAFFIC AT SIGNALIZED INTERSECTIONS : CHARACTERISTICS , HUMAN FACTORS AND UNCONSIDERED ISSUES , 1997 .

[68]  K. Ball,et al.  Visual/cognitive correlates of vehicle accidents in older drivers. , 1991, Psychology and aging.

[69]  G B Grayson,et al.  THE DEVELOPMENT OF HAZARD PERCEPTION TESTING , 2002 .

[70]  Jeff K. Caird,et al.  Visual Search for Traffic Signs: The Effects of Clutter, Luminance, and Aging , 2001, Hum. Factors.

[71]  R S Kennedy,et al.  Use of a motion sickness history questionnaire for prediction of simulator sickness. , 1992, Aviation, space, and environmental medicine.

[72]  David A Noyce.  Human factors considerations in the selection of a uniform protected/permitted left-turn signal display , 1999 .

[73]  P. K. Hughes,et al.  A Field Trial of Attention and Search Conspicuity , 1984 .

[74]  I. Rock,et al.  Inattentional blindness: An overview , 2003 .

[75]  M. Crognale.  Levine and Shefner’s Fundamentals of Sensation and Perception, 3rd Ed. , 2002 .

[76]  Merrill J. Allen,et al.  VISION AND HIGHWAY SAFETY , 1970 .

[77]  P T Cairney.  The conspicuity of bicycle lighting under on-road conditions , 1998 .

[78]  F. L. Engel.  Visual conspicuity, directed attention and retinal locus. , 1971, Vision research.

[79]  Barry L. Cole,et al.  SEARCH AND ATTENTION CONSPICUITY OF ROAD TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES , 1984 .

[80]  Donovan Green.  A Comparison of Stopping Distance Performance for Motorcycles Equipped with ABS , CBS and Conventional Hydraulic Brake Systems , 2006 .

[81]  Fridulv Sagberg,et al.  Hazard perception and driving experience among novice drivers. , 2006, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[82]  G J Hole,et al.  The influence of perceptual 'set' on the detection of motorcyclists using daytime headlights. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[83]  Sharon Cook.  Motor vehicle and pedal cycle conspicuity: part 3 - retroreflective and fluorescent materials : conspicuity of markings. , 1998 .

[84]  N. R. Bartlett,et al.  Effect of stimulus duration on electrical responses of the human retina. , 1956, Journal of the Optical Society of America.

[85]  Shinsuke Shimojo,et al.  Neuromagnetic responses to chromatic flicker: implications for photosensitivity , 2002, Neuroreport.

[86]  F. L. Kooi,et al.  Conspicuity: an efficient alternative for search time , 1999 .

[87]  Peter A. Hancock,et al.  MOTORCYCLE CONSPICUITY: AN EVALUATION AND SYNTHESIS OF INFLUENTIAL FACTORS , 1989 .

[88]  B. Cole,et al.  The effect of variability of background elements on the conspicuity of objects , 1984, Vision Research.

[89]  D Shinar,et al.  Visual Requirements for Safety and Mobility of Older Drivers , 1991, Human factors.

[90]  K. Rumar,et al.  The Effect of Running Lights on Vehicle Conspicuity in Daylight and Twilight , 1979 .

[91]  A Burg,et al.  Reflectorization for nighttime conspicuity of bicycles and motorcycles , 1978 .

[92]  E Tenkink,et al.  Conspicuity of Flashing Warning Lights at Dutch Open-Level Railroad Crossings , 1988 .

[93]  David Shinar.  The Effects of Expectancy, Clothing Reflectance, and Detection Criterion on Nighttime Pedestrian Visibility , 1985 .