Performance analysis of block and comb type channel estimation for massive MIMO systems

For pilot sequence based multiple input multiple output (MIMO) channel estimation, the arrangements of pilot symbols, such as the block or comb type arrangement, is known to play an important role. In this paper we compare the performance of block and comb pilot symbol patterns in terms of uplink mean square error (MSE) and spectral efficiency when the receiver at the base station employs least square (LS) or minimum mean square error (MMSE) channel estimation and MMSE equalizer for uplink data reception. For this system, we derive a closed form solution for the MSE and spectral efficiency that allows us to obtain exact results for an arbitrary number of antennas. Our key observation is that the comb pilot arrangement allows for unequal pilot-data power allocation in the frequency domain, which leads to a significant spectral efficiency increase. This spectral efficiency increase is particularly important with LS estimation and as the number of base station antennas grows large. It also gives noticeable gains with MMSE estimation. Our main conclusion is that with a large number of antennas, unequal power allocation facilitated by comb arrangement can give large gains over alternative pilot arrangements.

[1]  Miklós Telek,et al.  On the Pilot-Data Power Trade Off in Single Input Multiple Output Systems , 2014 .

[2]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  CTH03-2: Balancing Pilot and Data Power for Adaptive MIMO-OFDM Systems , 2006, IEEE Globecom 2006.

[3]  David Tse,et al.  Fundamentals of Wireless Communication , 2005 .

[4]  Kien T. Truong,et al.  Optimal Training in Continuous Flat-Fading Massive MIMO Systems , 2014 .

[5]  Thomas L. Marzetta,et al.  Pilot contamination precoding for interference reduction in large scale antenna systems , 2013, 2013 51st Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[6]  Hlaing Minn,et al.  Capacity Analysis and Pilot-Data Power Allocation for MIMO-OFDM With Transmitter and Receiver IQ Imbalances and Residual Carrier Frequency Offset , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology.

[7]  Stephen Wolfram,et al.  The Mathematica Book , 1996 .

[8]  Nihar Jindal,et al.  A Unified Treatment of Optimum Pilot Overhead in Multipath Fading Channels , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[9]  Babak Hassibi,et al.  How much training is needed in multiple-antenna wireless links? , 2003, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[10]  Steven Kay,et al.  Fundamentals Of Statistical Signal Processing , 2001 .

[11]  S. Kay Fundamentals of statistical signal processing: estimation theory , 1993 .

[12]  Neco Ventura,et al.  Optimal Training for the SM-MIMO-OFDM Systems with MMSE Channel Estimation , 2008, 6th Annual Communication Networks and Services Research Conference (cnsr 2008).

[13]  C. Orlenius,et al.  LONG TERM EVOLUTION 3 GPP LTE Radio and Cellular Technology , 2009 .

[14]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Optimal pilot-to-data power ratio for MIMO-OFDM , 2005, GLOBECOM '05. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference, 2005..

[15]  T.L. Marzetta,et al.  How Much Training is Required for Multiuser Mimo? , 2006, 2006 Fortieth Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[16]  Hidetoshi Kayama,et al.  DMRS Design and Channel Estimation for LTE-Advanced MIMO Uplink , 2009, 2009 IEEE 70th Vehicular Technology Conference Fall.

[17]  Borko Furht,et al.  Long Term Evolution: 3GPP LTE Radio and Cellular Technology , 2009 .