Hypofractionated radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with intermediate-risk localised prostate cancer: 2-year patient-reported outcomes of the randomised, non-inferiority, phase 3 CHHiP trial

Summary Background Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) might detect more toxic effects of radiotherapy than do clinician-reported outcomes. We did a quality of life (QoL) substudy to assess PROs up to 24 months after conventionally fractionated or hypofractionated radiotherapy in the Conventional or Hypofractionated High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy in Prostate Cancer (CHHiP) trial. Methods The CHHiP trial is a randomised, non-inferiority phase 3 trial done in 71 centres, of which 57 UK hospitals took part in the QoL substudy. Men with localised prostate cancer who were undergoing radiotherapy were eligible for trial entry if they had histologically confirmed T1b–T3aN0M0 prostate cancer, an estimated risk of seminal vesicle involvement less than 30%, prostate-specific antigen concentration less than 30 ng/mL, and a WHO performance status of 0 or 1. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to receive a standard fractionation schedule of 74 Gy in 37 fractions or one of two hypofractionated schedules: 60 Gy in 20 fractions or 57 Gy in 19 fractions. Randomisation was done with computer-generated permuted block sizes of six and nine, stratified by centre and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) risk group. Treatment allocation was not masked. UCLA Prostate Cancer Index (UCLA-PCI), including Short Form (SF)-36 and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P), or Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) and SF-12 quality-of-life questionnaires were completed at baseline, pre-radiotherapy, 10 weeks post-radiotherapy, and 6, 12, 18, and 24 months post-radiotherapy. The CHHiP trial completed accrual on June 16, 2011, and the QoL substudy was closed to further recruitment on Nov 1, 2009. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis. The primary endpoint of the QoL substudy was overall bowel bother and comparisons between fractionation groups were done at 24 months post-radiotherapy. The CHHiP trial is registered with ISRCTN registry, number ISRCTN97182923. Findings 2100 participants in the CHHiP trial consented to be included in the QoL substudy: 696 assigned to the 74 Gy schedule, 698 assigned to the 60 Gy schedule, and 706 assigned to the 57 Gy schedule. Of these individuals, 1659 (79%) provided data pre-radiotherapy and 1444 (69%) provided data at 24 months after radiotherapy. Median follow-up was 50·0 months (IQR 38·4–64·2) on April 9, 2014, which was the most recent follow-up measurement of all data collected before the QoL data were analysed in September, 2014. Comparison of 74 Gy in 37 fractions, 60 Gy in 20 fractions, and 57 Gy in 19 fractions groups at 2 years showed no overall bowel bother in 269 (66%), 266 (65%), and 282 (65%) men; very small bother in 92 (22%), 91 (22%), and 93 (21%) men; small bother in 26 (6%), 28 (7%), and 38 (9%) men; moderate bother in 19 (5%), 23 (6%), and 21 (5%) men, and severe bother in four (<1%), three (<1%) and three (<1%) men respectively (74 Gy vs 60 Gy, ptrend=0.64, 74 Gy vs 57 Gy, ptrend=0·59). We saw no differences between treatment groups in change of bowel bother score from baseline or pre-radiotherapy to 24 months. Interpretation The incidence of patient-reported bowel symptoms was low and similar between patients in the 74 Gy control group and the hypofractionated groups up to 24 months after radiotherapy. If efficacy outcomes from CHHiP show non-inferiority for hypofractionated treatments, these findings will add to the growing evidence for moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy schedules becoming the standard treatment for localised prostate cancer. Funding Cancer Research UK, Department of Health, and the National Institute for Health Research Cancer Research Network.

[1]  J. Fowler,et al.  Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma: final results of phase III randomized trial. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[2]  A. D'Amico,et al.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: prostate cancer. , 2010, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[3]  B. Heijmen,et al.  Hypofractionated versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for patients with prostate cancer (HYPRO): acute toxicity results from a randomised non-inferiority phase 3 trial. , 2015, The Lancet. Oncology.

[4]  Annie Gao,et al.  Conventional versus hypofractionated high-dose intensity-modulated radiotherapy for prostate cancer: preliminary safety results from the CHHiP randomised controlled trial. , 2012, The Lancet. Oncology.

[5]  D. Penson,et al.  Health related quality of life for men treated for localized prostate cancer with long-term followup. , 2010, The Journal of urology.

[6]  Anthony D'Amico,et al.  Prostate cancer. Clinical practice guidelines in oncology. , 2007, Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network : JNCCN.

[7]  Butler Wm,et al.  Wei JT, Dunn RL, Litwin MS, Sandler HM, Sanda MG. Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. Urology 2000;56:899-905. , 2006 .

[8]  A. Wein,et al.  Comparison of distribution- and anchor-based approaches to infer changes in health-related quality of life of prostate cancer survivors. , 2012, Health services research.

[9]  俊一 福原,et al.  Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) 日本語版の開発: 翻訳と文化的適合 , 2005 .

[10]  J. Ware,et al.  A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. , 1996, Medical care.

[11]  M. Sydes,et al.  Late Gastrointestinal Toxicity After Dose-Escalated Conformal Radiotherapy for Early Prostate Cancer: Results From the UK Medical Research Council RT01 Trial (ISRCTN47772397) , 2010, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[12]  D. Lubeck,et al.  Differences in urologist and patient assessments of health related quality of life in men with prostate cancer: results of the CaPSURE database. , 1998, The Journal of urology.

[13]  G. Storme,et al.  A randomized hypofractionation dose escalation trial for high risk prostate cancer patients: interim analysis of acute toxicity and quality of life in 124 patients , 2013, Radiation Oncology.

[14]  G. Sonn,et al.  Differing perceptions of quality of life in patients with prostate cancer and their doctors. , 2009, The Journal of urology.

[15]  M. Sydes,et al.  The early toxicity of escalated versus standard dose conformal radiotherapy with neo-adjuvant androgen suppression for patients with localised prostate cancer: results from the MRC RT01 trial (ISRCTN47772397). , 2007, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[16]  Steven J Frank,et al.  Defining a standard set of patient-centered outcomes for men with localized prostate cancer. , 2014, European urology.

[17]  W. J. Morris,et al.  Randomized trial comparing two fractionation schedules for patients with localized prostate cancer. , 2003, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[18]  R H Brook,et al.  The UCLA Prostate Cancer Index: development, reliability, and validity of a health-related quality of life measure. , 1998, Medical care.

[19]  N. Martin,et al.  Reply to Daniela Wittmann, Ted A. Skolarus' Letter to the Editor re: Neil E. Martin, Laura Massey, Caleb Stowell, et al. Defining a Standard Set of Patient-centered Outcomes for Men with Localized Prostate Cancer. Eur Urol 2014;67:460-7. , 2016, European urology.

[20]  J. Fowler,et al.  Acute and late toxicity in a randomized trial of conventional versus hypofractionated three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[21]  Richard Williams Generalized Ordered Logit/Partial Proportional Odds Models for Ordinal Dependent Variables , 2006 .

[22]  Martin G Sanda,et al.  Development and validation of an abbreviated version of the expanded prostate cancer index composite instrument for measuring health-related quality of life among prostate cancer survivors. , 2010, Urology.

[23]  A. D'Amico,et al.  A systematic review of hypofractionation for primary management of prostate cancer. , 2015, European urology.

[24]  K. Pienta,et al.  Measuring quality of life in men with prostate cancer using the functional assessment of cancer therapy-prostate instrument. , 1997, Urology.

[25]  D. Kuban,et al.  Clinical Investigation : Genitourinary Cancer Risk of Late Toxicity in Men Receiving Dose-Escalated Hypofractionated Intensity Modulated Prostate Radiation Therapy : Results From a Randomized Trial , 2014 .

[26]  H M Sandler,et al.  Development and validation of the expanded prostate cancer index composite (EPIC) for comprehensive assessment of health-related quality of life in men with prostate cancer. , 2000, Urology.

[27]  R. Stoyanova,et al.  Randomized trial of hypofractionated external-beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer. , 2013, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.